Balanced Propofol Sedation Versus Propofol Alone Sedation in Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
ERCP
Phase 4 Study of Balanced Propofol Sedation Versus Propofol Alone Sedation
1 other identifier
interventional
204
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Based on previous results, the investigators considered that sedation quality, complications, and procedure outcomes may not be different, however, propofol alone titration may have a fast recovery time than BPS and cost-effectiveness than balanced propofol sedation (BPS). In present study, the investigators therefore evaluate the time and sedation quality of patient recovery, cost-effectiveness, complication, and procedure outcomes between propofol alone and BPS in therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Apr 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedMarch 23, 2011
March 1, 2011
5 months
March 22, 2011
March 22, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recovery time and cost-effectiveness
Following therapeutic ERCP,full recovery time scoring by Aldrete scoring system and cost measured.
SIX MONTH
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Sedation efficacy, procedure-related outcomes, and complications.
SIX MONTH
Study Arms (2)
Propofol group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe conventional propofol group (P group), sedation was induced by an intravenous bolus injection of propofol (0.5 mg/kg body weight; 10 mg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV).
BPS group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe balanced propofol sedation group (BPS group), both midazolam (0.05 mg/kg body weight; 1 mg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV) and fentanyl (50 µg; 25 µg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV) were given intravenously at the initiation of sedation. Thereafter, an initial bolus of propofol (0.5 mg/kg body weight) was given intravenously. Sedation was maintained with repeated doses of 10 to 20 mg propofol.
Interventions
propofol (0.5 mg/kg body weight; 10 mg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV)
midazolam (0.05 mg/kg body weight; 1 mg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV) fentanyl (50 µg; 25 µg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV) propofol (0.5 mg/kg body weight)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- candidates for therapeutic ERCP
You may not qualify if:
- patient age \< 18 years
- pregnant women
- inability to provide informed consent
- patients with total gastrectomy
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Class V patients
- patients with known respiratory disease, patients with neurologic impairment
- patients with known allergy to the drugs used, history of complications with previous sedation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Tae Hoon Lee, MD
Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2011
First Posted
March 23, 2011
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
March 23, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-03