NCT01321047

Brief Summary

Based on previous results, the investigators considered that sedation quality, complications, and procedure outcomes may not be different, however, propofol alone titration may have a fast recovery time than BPS and cost-effectiveness than balanced propofol sedation (BPS). In present study, the investigators therefore evaluate the time and sedation quality of patient recovery, cost-effectiveness, complication, and procedure outcomes between propofol alone and BPS in therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
204

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 23, 2011

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2011

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

March 23, 2011

Status Verified

March 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

March 22, 2011

Last Update Submit

March 22, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

sedationbenzodiazepineopioidpropofol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Recovery time and cost-effectiveness

    Following therapeutic ERCP,full recovery time scoring by Aldrete scoring system and cost measured.

    SIX MONTH

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Sedation efficacy, procedure-related outcomes, and complications.

    SIX MONTH

Study Arms (2)

Propofol group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

the conventional propofol group (P group), sedation was induced by an intravenous bolus injection of propofol (0.5 mg/kg body weight; 10 mg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV).

Drug: Propofol

BPS group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

the balanced propofol sedation group (BPS group), both midazolam (0.05 mg/kg body weight; 1 mg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV) and fentanyl (50 µg; 25 µg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV) were given intravenously at the initiation of sedation. Thereafter, an initial bolus of propofol (0.5 mg/kg body weight) was given intravenously. Sedation was maintained with repeated doses of 10 to 20 mg propofol.

Drug: BPS

Interventions

propofol (0.5 mg/kg body weight; 10 mg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV)

Also known as: A GROUP
Propofol group
BPSDRUG

midazolam (0.05 mg/kg body weight; 1 mg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV) fentanyl (50 µg; 25 µg if age \> 70 or ASA class III-IV) propofol (0.5 mg/kg body weight)

Also known as: B GROUP
BPS group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • candidates for therapeutic ERCP

You may not qualify if:

  • patient age \< 18 years
  • pregnant women
  • inability to provide informed consent
  • patients with total gastrectomy
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Class V patients
  • patients with known respiratory disease, patients with neurologic impairment
  • patients with known allergy to the drugs used, history of complications with previous sedation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Propofol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Study Officials

  • Tae Hoon Lee, MD

    Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2011

First Posted

March 23, 2011

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion

September 1, 2011

Study Completion

October 1, 2011

Last Updated

March 23, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-03