Ridge Preservation in Molar Sites Comparing Xenograft Versus Mineralized Freeze-dried Bone Allograft
1 other identifier
interventional
24
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The objectives of the present investigation are; to compare the dimensional changes and the histological composition after the use of an allograft or xenograft and a resorbable membrane in ridge preservation in molar sites, to evaluate the influence of bone plates thickness on dimensional changes and the effectiveness of ridge preservation in limiting the need of sinus elevation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 9, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 7, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 2021
CompletedNovember 4, 2021
October 1, 2021
5.5 years
October 10, 2021
October 24, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of ridge dimensional changes following ridge preservation in molar sites comparing the use of freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA) or xenograft (DBBM), and a resorbable membrane.
To evaluate dimensional changes, the initial (CBCT1) and 5 months (CBCT2) CBCT images were processed and superimposed with the use of a specialized software image Simplant® O\&O (Denstply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA). Measurements were expressed in millimeters (mm) and percentages showing changes in ridge width at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm from the bone crest. The height of the buccal, and lingual bone crest was assessed, as well as the heigh in the central are of the socket.
5 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Evaluate the influence of buccal or lingual bone thickness on bone ridge changes
5 months
Evaluate the histologic composition of the regenerated areas after the use of freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA) or xenograft (DBBM), and a resorbable membrane.
5 months
Study Arms (2)
xenograft and a collagen membrane
ACTIVE COMPARATORallograft and a collagen membrane
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Ridge preservation in molar areas using a xenograft or an allograft in combination with a barrier collagen membrane
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients, over 18 years old.
- In need of removal of a maxillary or mandibular molar first or second molar.
- The molars to be extracted had to be bordered by at least one tooth.
- The molars had to have a presence of \> 2 mm of keratinized gingiva and three intact bony walls.
- A dehiscence on the fourth wall, if any, had to be equal or less than 2 mm in height.
- Only one extraction per patient was accepted.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute periodontal or periapical infection.
- Pregnancy or lactancy.
- Smokers of more than 10 cigarettes per day.
- Previous adverse reactions to the biomaterials used in the study.
- Metabolic diseases affecting the mechanism of bone remodelling.
- Medications or treatments taken in the last twelve months and known to affect bone "turnover".
- Patients with poor plaque control -more than 20% (O'Leary, Drake, Naylor, 1972).
- Patients with absence of periodontal health maintenance or postoperative recommendations compliance.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunyalead
- BioHorizons, Inc.collaborator
- Geistlich Pharma AGcollaborator
- Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumablescollaborator
Related Publications (5)
Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:195-223. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13057. Erratum In: J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jan;47(1):129. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13212.
PMID: 30623987BACKGROUNDNart J, Barallat L, Jimenez D, Mestres J, Gomez A, Carrasco MA, Violant D, Ruiz-Magaz V. Radiographic and histological evaluation of deproteinized bovine bone mineral vs. deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in ridge preservation. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):840-848. doi: 10.1111/clr.12889. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
PMID: 27335267BACKGROUNDTonetti MS, Jung RE, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Cosyn J, Fickl S, Figuero E, Goldstein M, Graziani F, Madianos P, Molina A, Nart J, Salvi GE, Sanz-Martin I, Thoma D, Van Assche N, Vignoletti F. Management of the extraction socket and timing of implant placement: Consensus report and clinical recommendations of group 3 of the XV European Workshop in Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:183-194. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13131.
PMID: 31215112BACKGROUNDWalker CJ, Prihoda TJ, Mealey BL, Lasho DJ, Noujeim M, Huynh-Ba G. Evaluation of Healing at Molar Extraction Sites With and Without Ridge Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Periodontol. 2017 Mar;88(3):241-249. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160445. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
PMID: 27788625BACKGROUNDDuong M, Mealey BL, Walker C, Al-Harthi S, Prihoda TJ, Huynh-Ba G. Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with and without ridge preservation: A three-arm histologic analysis. J Periodontol. 2020 Jan;91(1):74-82. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0237. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
PMID: 31355447BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jose Nart Molina
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 10, 2021
First Posted
November 4, 2021
Study Start
December 9, 2013
Primary Completion
June 7, 2019
Study Completion
June 7, 2019
Last Updated
November 4, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share