NCT05100706

Brief Summary

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a frequent performed surgery. Many institutions are implementing outpatient programs for this surgery and adequate pain management is an important feature. Analgesic duration of single shot nerve blocks is limited to no more than 24h. Conversely, the use of continuous nerve block (CNB) through a perineural catheter and infusion of local anesthetic may increase duration of analgesia and provide better outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate effectiveness and safety of using CNB in patients undergoing primary TKA, and its effects on patients' quality of recovery. We hypothesize that continuous adductor canal block would lead to a better quality of recovery in patients undergoing primary TKA.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 28, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 29, 2021

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2023

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 6, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 25, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

September 28, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 24, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15)

    Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15): from 0 to 150. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Day 1

  • Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15)

    Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15): from 0 to 150. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Day 2

  • Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15)

    Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15): from 0 to 150. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Day 3

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Pain scores

    Day 1

  • Pain scores

    Day 2

  • Pain scores

    Day 3

  • Pain scores

    Day 30

  • Opioid usage

    Day 1

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Continuous adductor canal block (CACB)

EXPERIMENTAL

Will receive an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine 5mL/h through adductor canal catheter.

Drug: Continuous adductor canal block (CACB)

Sham continuous adductor canal block (ShACB).

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Will receive an infusion of NaCl 0.9% 5mL/h through adductor canal catheter.

Drug: Sham continuous adductor canal block (ShACB).

Interventions

Ropivacaine 0.2% infusion through adductor canal catheter

Continuous adductor canal block (CACB)

NaCl 0.9% infusion through adductor canal catheter

Sham continuous adductor canal block (ShACB).

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing unilateral primary TKA in an outpatient or short-stay setting (estimated discharge on POD#0-1).
  • Patients older than 21 years of age.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
  • No alcohol or drug dependency.
  • Sufficient understand and co-operation about the perineural catheter.

You may not qualify if:

  • Chronic opioid use of morphine 30mg equivalent per day for last 2 consecutive weeks.
  • Allergy to the study medications.
  • Coagulopathy and platelet count \< 105/μL.
  • Patients with contraindications to the insertion of an epidural or adductor canal catheter (severe anatomic abnormalities or history of previous surgery at the site of catheter placement).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Price AJ, Alvand A, Troelsen A, Katz JN, Hooper G, Gray A, Carr A, Beard D. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2018 Nov 3;392(10158):1672-1682. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32344-4.

    PMID: 30496082BACKGROUND
  • Cullom C, Weed JT. Anesthetic and Analgesic Management for Outpatient Knee Arthroplasty. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2017 May;21(5):23. doi: 10.1007/s11916-017-0623-y.

    PMID: 28283810BACKGROUND
  • Ilfeld BM, Duke KB, Donohue MC. The association between lower extremity continuous peripheral nerve blocks and patient falls after knee and hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2010 Dec;111(6):1552-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fb9507. Epub 2010 Oct 1.

    PMID: 20889937BACKGROUND
  • Sharma S, Iorio R, Specht LM, Davies-Lepie S, Healy WL. Complications of femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):135-40. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1025-1. Epub 2009 Aug 13.

    PMID: 19680735BACKGROUND
  • Sankineani SR, Reddy ARC, Eachempati KK, Jangale A, Gurava Reddy AV. Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Oct;28(7):1391-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2218-7. Epub 2018 May 2.

    PMID: 29721648BACKGROUND
  • Leung P, Dickerson DM, Denduluri SK, Mohammed MK, Lu M, Anitescu M, Luu HH. Postoperative continuous adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty improves pain and functional recovery: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Sep;49:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

    PMID: 29890381BACKGROUND
  • Yu R, Wang H, Zhuo Y, Liu D, Wu C, Zhang Y. Continuous adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with the single-shot adductor canal block?: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22762. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022762.

    PMID: 33120783BACKGROUND
  • Hanson NA, Lee PH, Yuan SC, Choi DS, Allen CJ, Auyong DB. Continuous ambulatory adductor canal catheters for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:190-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

    PMID: 27871518BACKGROUND
  • Myles PS. More than just morbidity and mortality - quality of recovery and long-term functional recovery after surgery. Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75 Suppl 1:e143-e150. doi: 10.1111/anae.14786.

    PMID: 31903564BACKGROUND
  • Sun C, Zhang X, Song F, Zhao Z, Du R, Wu S, Ma Q, Cai X. Is continuous catheter adductor canal block better than single-shot canal adductor canal block in primary total knee arthroplasty?: A GRADE analysis of the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20320. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020320.

    PMID: 32443383BACKGROUND
  • Johansson Stark A, Charalambous A, Istomina N, Salantera S, Sigurdardottir AK, Sourtzi P, Valkeapaa K, Zabalegui A, Bachrach-Lindstrom M. The quality of recovery on discharge from hospital, a comparison between patients undergoing hip and knee replacement - a European study. J Clin Nurs. 2016 Sep;25(17-18):2489-501. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13278. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

    PMID: 27264877BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Acute Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Naveed Siddiqui, MD, MSc

    University of Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Patients will be randomized to one of the two groups using a computer-generated random numbers table. The randomization will be done before the beginning of the study and will define which study number is going to be managed as interventional group (continuous adductor canal block - CACB) or control group (sham continuous adductor canal block - ShACB). Each patient will receive a study number following the order of their entrance on the study. The elastomeric pumps to be used connected to the catheter will be previously prepared by hospital pharmacy, accordingly to the randomization made and the subject study number, with no identification of the content (NaCl 0.9% or Ropivacaine 0.2%). Hospital pharmacy will not be blinded for which study number and elastomeric pump will be linked to the study group. Research coordinator, professional who performs the adductor canal catheter insertion and researcher who collects the data will be blinded to which group each patient was randomized.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled prospective trial, blinded for patient and evaluator, in patients undergoing outpatient primary TKA at Sinai Health.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2021

First Posted

October 29, 2021

Study Start

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion

January 6, 2025

Study Completion

June 30, 2025

Last Updated

March 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations