NCT05091944

Brief Summary

An interactive web-based decision aid for shared decision making: birth choice after cesarean in Taiwan Background: Taiwan has a high national caesarean rate coupled with a low vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) rate. Studies suggest that pregnant women do not receive sufficient information about birth choices after caesarean in Taiwan and shared decision making (SDM) is not an expectation. Chen conducted a pilot study. Improvements in knowledge for the decision aid group were larger than for the usual care group, although differences between groups were not statistically significant. An interactive multimedia technology and humanity communication may provide opportunities to increase engagement and support women during decision consultations. Following previous pilot study, the study aims to examine the effectiveness of an interactive web-based birth decision aid for SDM in pregnant women who have had a previous cesarean. Methods: A quantitative approach will be conducted with a randomized pre-test and post-test experimental design in a medical center in northern Taiwan. Participants who have had one previous CS will be recruited at 14-16 weeks. A total of 172 women will be completed a baseline survey and will be randomly allocated to either the intervention (usual care plus an interactive web-based birth decision aid ) or usual care (general maternal health booklet) group. A follow up survey at 35-38 weeks measured change in decisional conflict, knowledge, birth preference and decision aid acceptability. Actual birth outcomes and satisfaction will be assessed one month after birth. Contributions/ Implementation of clinical practice The study will potentially increase women and obstetricians to support VBAC and SDM. The interactive decision aid tool may reduce time-consumption for health education. Linking web-based data analysis of AI into medical record can be beneficial for clinical practice and research in the future.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
86

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 14, 2021

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 15, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 25, 2021

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 29, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

September 14, 2021

Last Update Submit

October 24, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

communication aidsweb-based decision aids

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • change is being assessed-decisional conflict

    Decisional conflict score (DCS)includes 16 questions. Using the 5-point Likert 5 rating, from "strongly agree" (0 points) to "strongly disagree" (4 points)

    14-16 week gestation and 35-38week gestation

  • change is being assessed-knowledge

    Knowledge measurement consists of a 15-item questionnaire asking participants to answer ''true,'' ''false,'' or ''unsure'' to a series of statements regarding risks and benefits of each birth mode

    14-16 week gestation and 35-38week gestation

  • change is being assessed-birth preference

    VBAC/ERCS

    14-16 week gestation and 35-38week gestation

  • decision aid acceptability

    Decision aid acceptability included nine questions to measure women's acceptability regarding decision aid , using the Likert 5 rating, from "not at all" (1 points) to "a great deal" (5 points)

    35-38week gestation

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Actual birth outcomes

    one month after birth

  • satisfaction of decision

    one month after birth

Study Arms (2)

intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

usual care plus web-based birth decision aid

Device: web-based birth decision aid

control

NO INTERVENTION

ususal care

Interventions

Women in the intervention group receive both usual care and decision support (an interactive web-based birth decision aid). The innovative interactive web-based birth decision aid comprised five components: Component 1-a communication aid video involves 2 expert's talk about how to participate in SDM and prepare self with choice talk, option talk and decision talk(10 minutes )and practice communication skills with clinician(10 minutes); Component 2-overall of the function and features of birth decision aid. Component 3-introduce the benefits and risk of vaginal birth after cesarean; Component 4- the benefits and risk of elective repeat cesarean section; Component 5 -a quit to confirm women's knowledge regarding the two choices and confirm women's values.

intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility Detailspregnant women
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • pregnant women had experienced one previous cesarean
  • pregnant women had at least a half year interval between current pregnancy and the previous birth

You may not qualify if:

  • women are multiple pregnancy
  • women had previous classic CS or myomectomy
  • pregnant women have high risk of complications

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Taipei, 11217, Taiwan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Chen SW, Shorten A, Yeh CC, Kao CH, Lu YY, Hu HW. An innovative web-based decision-aid about birth after cesarean for shared decision making in Taiwan: study protocol for a randomized control trial. Trials. 2023 Feb 9;24(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07103-8.

Study Officials

  • Shu Wen Chen, PhD

    National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Shu Wen Chen, PhD

CONTACT

Chang-Ching Yeh, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2021

First Posted

October 25, 2021

Study Start

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

October 29, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-10

Locations