NCT05088278|Completed
Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
41
1 country
1
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
July 27, 2023
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 27, 2023
Actual (reported)The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term results of various anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. This assessment is necessary for the current context of anterior cruciate ligament research as several techniques and grafts are used in clinical practice, however, the various studies existing in the literature focus mainly only on the direct comparison of two techniques and usually with short-to-medium term follow-up. Since gonarthrosis is one of the most debated consequences of cruciate ligament reconstruction, a comparison of different long-term procedures would be desirable to have a clearer picture of the risks and benefits associated with different types of intervention.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
July 27, 2023
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 1, 2021
Actual (reported)October 12, 2021
Actual (reported)October 21, 2021
Actual (reported)July 27, 2023
Actual (reported)July 27, 2023
Actual (reported)Subjective and objective International Knee Documentation Committee
Clinical scores widely used to assess knee function and symptoms Values: 0 (worst score) to 100 (best score) for subjective IKDC; A (best score)-B-C-D (worst score) for objective IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee)
Two years
VAS pain
Numerical score to quantitatively assess the intensity of pain (0-10)
Two years
Kellgreen-Lawrence
Radiographical score that graded knee ostheoarthritis
Two years
Knee Laxity
Assessment of knee anterior posterior laxity and quantification of Pivot shift using measurement devices (KT-1000; Kira)
Two years
Short Form-36 Health Survey
Two years
Anterior knee pain
Two years
Global satisfaction about the surgical procedure
Two years
Tight circumference
Two years
Lysholm knee scoring scale
Two years
Patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings
Patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon
Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with Over-the-top plus lateral plasty technique
Anatomical ACL reconstruction with quadruple-bundle hamstrings graft
Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, 40136, Italy
Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ. Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2459-2468. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9.
Getgood A, Hewison C, Bryant D, Litchfield R, Heard M, Buchko G, Hiemstra LA, Willits KR, Firth A, MacDonald P; Stability Study Group. No Difference in Functional Outcomes When Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Added to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Active Patients: The Stability Study. Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1690-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
Stefano Zaffagnini, MD Prof
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
41 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
October 12, 2021
First Posted
October 21, 2021
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Failure and complications
Failures and complication rate for each arm of the study
Two years
Non-anatomical ACL reconstruction, the hamstrings' tibial insertion is preserved; a double-bundle hamstring graft is passed intra-articularly, fixed in over the top position on the lateral femoral condyle, and then passed extra-articularly deeply to ileo-tibial band up to the tibia, where it is fixed at the level of Gerdy's tubercle.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Grassi A, Roberti di Sarsina T, Raggi F, Signorelli C, Urrizola F, Spinnato P, Rimondi E, Marcacci M. Over-the-top ACL Reconstruction Plus Extra-articular Lateral Tenodesis With Hamstring Tendon Grafts: Prospective Evaluation With 20-Year Minimum Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;45(14):3233-3242. doi: 10.1177/0363546517723013. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
Xie X, Xiao Z, Li Q, Zhu B, Chen J, Chen H, Yang F, Chen Y, Lai Q, Liu X. Increased incidence of osteoarthritis of knee joint after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts than hamstring autografts: a meta-analysis of 1,443 patients at a minimum of 5 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jan;25(1):149-59. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1459-3. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, Courtot L, Berard E, Cavaignac E. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3531-3540. doi: 10.1177/0363546518825340. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Chen H, Liu H, Chen L. Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2020 Aug;36(8):2279-2291.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 May 7.
Curado J, Hulet C, Hardy P, Jenny JY, Rousseau R, Lucet A, Steltzlen C, Morin V, Grimaud O, Bouguennec N, Pujol N, Sonnery-Cottet B, Graveleau N; French Society for Orthopaedic, Trauma Surgery (Societe francaise de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, SoFCOT). Very long-term osteoarthritis rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 182 cases with 22-year' follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):459-463. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.034. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Nov;14(11):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0130-x. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
Primary Completion
July 27, 2023
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 27, 2023
Actual (reported)Last Updated
July 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: