Reconsolidation Therapy With Propranolol as a Treatment for Chronic Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study is to document the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention consisting of pain neuroscience education and reconsolidation therapy with propranolol in adults suffering from chronic pain (chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia). The secondary aim of the study is to estimate the effect size of the intervention on pain and function one month post-intervention, and to obtain data for sample-size calculation for a subsequent randomized controlled trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Feb 2022
Typical duration for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2025
CompletedSeptember 26, 2025
December 1, 2024
2.9 years
September 27, 2021
September 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Feasibility outcome 1 : Weekly recruitment rate
Number of prospective participants successfully recruited every week, vs number of participants excluded and number of refusals
Through recruitment phase (estimated 3 months per population)
Feasibility outcome 2 : Rate of study completion
Percentage of sample with perfect attendance vs partial attendance vs withdrawal vs exclusion vs loss to follow-up.
Through data collection phase (estimated 6 months per population)
Feasibility outcome 3 : Number of participants with adverse events (observed and self-reported)
For all adverse even, the following will be reported : Type \& severity (according to the CTCAE), attribution, expected vs unexpected
Through data collection phase (estimated 6 months per population)
Feasibility outcome 4 : % participants in each group who believe they received the experimental treatment (propranolol)
This percentage will be compared between the two groups to assess blinding
At follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)
Acceptability outcome 1 : perceived burden of the intervention (prospective and retrospective)
Rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10; 10 = worse outcome)
Prospective rating : at baseline ; Retrospective rating : at follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)
Acceptability outcome 2 : perceived ethicality of the intervention (prospective and retrospective)
Rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10; 10 = better outcome)
Prospective rating : at baseline ; Retrospective rating : at follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)
Acceptability outcome 3 : perceived coherence of the intervention (prospective and retrospective)
Rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10; 10 = better outcome)
Prospective rating : at baseline ; Retrospective rating : at follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)
Acceptability outcome 4 : perceived effectiveness of the intervention (prospective and retrospective)
Rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10; 10 = better outcome)
Prospective rating : at baseline ; Retrospective rating : at follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)
Acceptability outcome 5 : perceived self-efficacy relating to the intervention (prospective and retrospective)
Rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10; 10 = better outcome)
Prospective rating : at baseline ; Retrospective rating : at follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in Physical functioning
From baseline to follow-up (approx 12 weeks)
Change in Pain intensity
From baseline to follow-up (approx 12 weeks)
Change in Emotional functioning
From baseline to follow-up (on average, 12 weeks)
Change in Central sensitization
From baseline to follow-up (on average, 12 weeks)
Change in Symptoms of fibromyalgia
From baseline to follow-up (on average, 12 weeks)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Propranolol
EXPERIMENTAL1. Pain neuroscience education (10 short videos - 2 to 4 mins each) 2. 6 weekly sessions of Reconsolidation therapy with propranolol. At the beginning of each session, participants will take 2 to 4 capsules of 20 mg propranolol (dose calculated based on sex and height). One hour after ingestion of the propranolol, participants will undergo a reactivation procedure, wherein they will be asked to describe/visualize painful movements/activities.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOR1. Pain neuroscience education (10 short videos - 2 to 4 mins each) 2. 6 weekly sessions of Reconsolidation therapy with a placebo. At the beginning of each session, participants will take 2 to 4 capsules of 20 mg placebo (dose calculated based on sex and height). One hour after ingestion of the placebo, participants will undergo a reactivation procedure, wherein they will be asked to describe/visualize painful movements/activities.
Interventions
6 weekly doses (40 to 80 mg) 1h before the reactivation procedure
6 weekly doses (40 to 80 mg) 1h before the reactivation procedure
Description/visualization of painful movements/activities
In the form of 10 videos that participants will watch on their own time
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- French speaking
- Suffering from \[chronic low back pain OR fibromyalgia\] for \>6 months
- Average pain at least 4/10
- Central sensitization (assessed via a standardized physiotherapy evaluation and the Central Sensitization Inventory)
You may not qualify if:
- Health condition for which propranolol is contra-indicated
- Medication with which co-administration of propranolol is contra-indicated
- Severe or uncontrolled neurological/psychiatric condition (including post-traumatic stress disorder, substance abuse, suicidal ideation, etc.)
- Surgery of the lower-back in the last 3 years
- Litigation surrounding the painful condition
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement (CdRV)
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 4C4, Canada
CRCHUS: Centre de recherche du centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H5N4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guillaume Leonard, PhD
Université de Sherbrooke
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2021
First Posted
October 20, 2021
Study Start
February 7, 2022
Primary Completion
December 30, 2024
Study Completion
August 31, 2025
Last Updated
September 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share