NCT05085782

Brief Summary

The primary aim of this study is to document the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention consisting of pain neuroscience education and reconsolidation therapy with propranolol in adults suffering from chronic pain (chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia). The secondary aim of the study is to estimate the effect size of the intervention on pain and function one month post-intervention, and to obtain data for sample-size calculation for a subsequent randomized controlled trial.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 27, 2021

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 20, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 7, 2022

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 26, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

September 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 22, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic painReconsolidation therapyPropranololTreatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Feasibility outcome 1 : Weekly recruitment rate

    Number of prospective participants successfully recruited every week, vs number of participants excluded and number of refusals

    Through recruitment phase (estimated 3 months per population)

  • Feasibility outcome 2 : Rate of study completion

    Percentage of sample with perfect attendance vs partial attendance vs withdrawal vs exclusion vs loss to follow-up.

    Through data collection phase (estimated 6 months per population)

  • Feasibility outcome 3 : Number of participants with adverse events (observed and self-reported)

    For all adverse even, the following will be reported : Type \& severity (according to the CTCAE), attribution, expected vs unexpected

    Through data collection phase (estimated 6 months per population)

  • Feasibility outcome 4 : % participants in each group who believe they received the experimental treatment (propranolol)

    This percentage will be compared between the two groups to assess blinding

    At follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)

  • Acceptability outcome 1 : perceived burden of the intervention (prospective and retrospective)

    Rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10; 10 = worse outcome)

    Prospective rating : at baseline ; Retrospective rating : at follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)

  • Acceptability outcome 2 : perceived ethicality of the intervention (prospective and retrospective)

    Rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10; 10 = better outcome)

    Prospective rating : at baseline ; Retrospective rating : at follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)

  • Acceptability outcome 3 : perceived coherence of the intervention (prospective and retrospective)

    Rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10; 10 = better outcome)

    Prospective rating : at baseline ; Retrospective rating : at follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)

  • Acceptability outcome 4 : perceived effectiveness of the intervention (prospective and retrospective)

    Rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10; 10 = better outcome)

    Prospective rating : at baseline ; Retrospective rating : at follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)

  • Acceptability outcome 5 : perceived self-efficacy relating to the intervention (prospective and retrospective)

    Rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10; 10 = better outcome)

    Prospective rating : at baseline ; Retrospective rating : at follow-up (on average,12 weeks after recruitment)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Physical functioning

    From baseline to follow-up (approx 12 weeks)

  • Change in Pain intensity

    From baseline to follow-up (approx 12 weeks)

  • Change in Emotional functioning

    From baseline to follow-up (on average, 12 weeks)

  • Change in Central sensitization

    From baseline to follow-up (on average, 12 weeks)

  • Change in Symptoms of fibromyalgia

    From baseline to follow-up (on average, 12 weeks)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Propranolol

EXPERIMENTAL

1. Pain neuroscience education (10 short videos - 2 to 4 mins each) 2. 6 weekly sessions of Reconsolidation therapy with propranolol. At the beginning of each session, participants will take 2 to 4 capsules of 20 mg propranolol (dose calculated based on sex and height). One hour after ingestion of the propranolol, participants will undergo a reactivation procedure, wherein they will be asked to describe/visualize painful movements/activities.

Drug: Propranolol HydrochlorideBehavioral: Reactivation procedureBehavioral: Pain neuroscience education

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

1. Pain neuroscience education (10 short videos - 2 to 4 mins each) 2. 6 weekly sessions of Reconsolidation therapy with a placebo. At the beginning of each session, participants will take 2 to 4 capsules of 20 mg placebo (dose calculated based on sex and height). One hour after ingestion of the placebo, participants will undergo a reactivation procedure, wherein they will be asked to describe/visualize painful movements/activities.

Drug: PlaceboBehavioral: Reactivation procedureBehavioral: Pain neuroscience education

Interventions

6 weekly doses (40 to 80 mg) 1h before the reactivation procedure

Also known as: Experimental group
Propranolol

6 weekly doses (40 to 80 mg) 1h before the reactivation procedure

Also known as: Control group
Placebo

Description/visualization of painful movements/activities

PlaceboPropranolol

In the form of 10 videos that participants will watch on their own time

PlaceboPropranolol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • French speaking
  • Suffering from \[chronic low back pain OR fibromyalgia\] for \>6 months
  • Average pain at least 4/10
  • Central sensitization (assessed via a standardized physiotherapy evaluation and the Central Sensitization Inventory)

You may not qualify if:

  • Health condition for which propranolol is contra-indicated
  • Medication with which co-administration of propranolol is contra-indicated
  • Severe or uncontrolled neurological/psychiatric condition (including post-traumatic stress disorder, substance abuse, suicidal ideation, etc.)
  • Surgery of the lower-back in the last 3 years
  • Litigation surrounding the painful condition

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement (CdRV)

Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 4C4, Canada

Location

CRCHUS: Centre de recherche du centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H5N4, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

FibromyalgiaChronic Pain

Interventions

PropranololControl Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenoxypropanolaminesPropanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsPropanolsAminesNaphthalenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsPolycyclic CompoundsEpidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Officials

  • Guillaume Leonard, PhD

    Université de Sherbrooke

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2021

First Posted

October 20, 2021

Study Start

February 7, 2022

Primary Completion

December 30, 2024

Study Completion

August 31, 2025

Last Updated

September 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations