Online Transdiagnostic Intervention for Emotional Disorders and Stress-related Disorders
Suitability, Clinical Utility and Acceptability of an Online Transdiagnostic Intervention for Emotional Disorders and Stress-related Disorders in Mexican Sample: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
159
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The general objective of this study is to determine the indicators of suitability, clinical utility and satisfaction of the transdiagnostic online intervention for the treatment of emotional disorders and those derived from stress and trauma in a Mexican community sample. The specific aims are:
- To Carry out a screening evaluation from the transdiagnostic model by evaluating clinical indicators (depression, anxiety, acute / post-traumatic stress, emotional regulation strategies, intolerance to uncertainty) and that allow determining the frequency, intensity and severity of cases identified by type of emotional problem.
- Measure the fidelity of the use of the intervention manual in each treatment condition.
- Evaluate the degree of satisfaction, acceptance, complexity and modality of the transdiagnostic intervention.
- To know the degree of suitability of the transdiagnostic intervention from the point of view of therapists and supervisors in relation to the problems of the studied sample and the recommendations for its improvement.
- To compare the clinical utility of the transdiagnostic intervention via the internet for the treatment of emotional disorders and those derived from stress and trauma against the efficacy of the CBT intervention and the waiting list group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedOctober 18, 2021
October 1, 2021
1.2 years
October 4, 2021
October 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Decrease in the score of Beck Anxiety Inventory
Beck Anxiety Inventory ( BAI , Beck \& Steer, 1990). Self-applied instrument that consists of 21 questions that determine the severity with which the symptomatic and behavioral categories of anxiety symptoms present in an individual are presented. High internal consistency and adequate construct validity, divergent and convergent (Robles, Varela, Jurado \& Páez, 2001).
9 weeks
Decrease in the score of Beck Depression Inventory
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II; Beck, Steer \& Brown, 1996). It consists of 21 items that fundamentally evaluate the clinical symptoms of melancholy and the intrusive thoughts present in depression. Cronbach's alpha for version II (= .87-.92)
9 weeks
Decrease in the score of Checkable List of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
This instrument describes the symptoms of post-traumatic stress taking into consideration the diagnostic criteria of activation, alterations, avoidance and reexperimentation. It has 20 items that are scored on a Likert-type scale that goes from 0 (not at all) to 4 (totally). In its adaptation to the Mexican population, the psychometric properties of the scale show adequate internal consistency with an alpha of .97, as well as an appropriate convergent validity (rs = .58 to .88; Durón-Figueroa et al., 2019).
9 weeks
Decrease in the score of Scale of Difficulties in Emotional Regulation
Scale of Difficulties in Emotional Regulation (DERS ; Gratz, \& Roemer, 2004). It is a self-applied instrument that measures two dimensions through 15 items, emotional regulation strategies and awareness of emotions. Version validated into Spanish by De la Rosa et al. (2021). Presents Cronbach's alpha between .84-.74.
9 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Increase the level of acceptance and satisfaction of psychological treatment
9 weeks
Study Arms (3)
transdiagnostic intervention via the Internet
EXPERIMENTALTreatment provided in eight individual sessions of 60 min., Once a week by videoconference. The integrity of the treatment will be controlled through the therapist's manual (Barlow et al., 2011) adapted for the Mexican population and to the online modality.
TCC intervention via the Internet
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe TCC intervention program is short, with active, focused and directive participation, in 8 individual weekly sessions of one hour by videoconference.
waiting list control.
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in the control group on the waiting list will be assigned to the intervention after 2 months after randomization and will join the Transdiagnostic intervention.
Interventions
Based on the theoretical proposal of Barlow et al. (2011) a treatment applicable to all anxiety and mood disorders (unipolar depression) will be implemented. The unified protocol incorporates proven emotion-focused psychological techniques (Ellard et al., 2010). The main components are: (1) motivation for change, understanding emotions, and recognition and observation of emotional response; (2) learn to observe experiences, evaluate and reevaluate thoughts; (3) what is emotional avoidance, emotion and behavior, and awareness and tolerance of physical sensations; (4) emotional exposure to physical sensations and situations and achievements, maintenance and prevention of relapses.
This program incorporates psychological techniques under the cognitive-behavioral model that have demonstrated their effectiveness in online mode (De la Rosa, 2019; Flores et al., 2014). The main components are: (1) psychoeducation, (2) cognitive restructuring, (3) identification and expression of emotions, (4) assertiveness training and (5) problem solving, and (6) relapse prevention. The order of application of each technique is established by the advisor derived from the formulation of treatment of each case to solve the problems raised, under supervision.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- be of legal age;
- voluntarily participate in the study;
- meet diagnostic criteria for emotional disorders (anxiety or depression) according to the International Neuropsychiatric Interview- Mini, version 5.0, and show a score ≤ 25 on the Beck Anxiety Depression Inventory and / or ≤ 30 on the Inventory Depression of Beck-BDI-II,
- have access to a computer equipment with an Internet connection, (e) have a valid email address, (f) have basic digital skills in the use of a system operating and internet browsing.
You may not qualify if:
- psychotic disorder;
- alcohol and drug abuse;
- medical illness whose severity or characteristics prevent the performance of the intervention;
- be receiving psychological and / or pharmacological treatment during the study.
- Elimination criteria:
- not accepting the conditions of informed consent
- absence in two consecutive sessions to the synchronous treatment sessions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico
Tlalnepantla, State of Mexico, Mexico, 54090, Mexico
Related Publications (6)
Andersson G. Internet-Delivered Psychological Treatments. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:157-79. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093006. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
PMID: 26652054BACKGROUNDAndrews G, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, Titov N. Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 13;5(10):e13196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013196.
PMID: 20967242BACKGROUNDBarlow DH, Allen LB, Choate ML. Toward a Unified Treatment for Emotional Disorders - Republished Article. Behav Ther. 2016 Nov;47(6):838-853. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
PMID: 27993336BACKGROUNDCárdenas, G., Botella, C., Quero, S., De la Rosa, A. & Baños, R. Programa de Telepsicología para el Tratamiento de la Fobia a hablar en público en Población Mexicana. Revista Psicología Iberoamericana. 2014; 22 (1): 45-54.
BACKGROUNDCárdenas, G., Flores, L. y De la Rosa, A. Psicoterapia vía Internet: Manual de entrenamiento. Facultad de Psicología de la UNAM. DGAPA. 2012. ISBN-978-606-02-2263-4.
BACKGROUNDEllard KK, Fairholme CP, Boisseau CL, Farchione TJ, Barlow DH. Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: Protocol Development and Initial Outcome Data. Cogn Behav Pract. 2010 Feb;17(1):88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.06.002. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
PMID: 33762811BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Alejandrina Hernández-Posadas, PhD student
Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico
- STUDY CHAIR
Pablo D Valencia, PhD student
Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico
- STUDY CHAIR
Carolina Santillán-Torres Torija, PhD
Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico
- STUDY CHAIR
Paulina Arenas-Landgrave, PhD
Faculty of Psychology, National Autonomous University of Mexico
- STUDY CHAIR
Berenice Serrano-Zarate, PhD
Universitat Jaume I
- STUDY CHAIR
Alejandro Domínguez-Rodríguez, PhD
Valencian International University
- STUDY CHAIR
Mario F Vázquez-Sánchez, Ms student
Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico
- STUDY CHAIR
Alicia I Flores-Elvira, Ms
Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double-blinded: The initial interview by the evaluator will be recorded and the video / audio will be shared with an independent evaluator who does not know the case for evaluation. Once the evaluation is completed, users will be randomly assigned to one of the study conditions. The randomization will be carried out by an independent researcher through the random.stg software in a 1: 1: 1 ratio by saturation of blocks of 12 per condition. The coordinator will inform the participant of the condition in which he / she will participate in the study (experimental or control waiting list) and, depending on the characteristics of said condition, he / she will be discharged from the study and will put him / her in contact with the advisor who has been assigned to you.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2021
First Posted
October 18, 2021
Study Start
November 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
October 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- This data will be available in december 2022 and it will be available for 5 years. It will be shared in the databases of the journal where the article(s) will be published.
- Access Criteria
- Open access saving personal and sensitive data of the participants.
The information will be available in a private server or in a open server of the journal(s) that we will publish the articles that will be the result of this study. The informed consent is already shared in the register of clinical trials.