NCT05075278

Brief Summary

Attending physicians often supervise novice junior residents in a direct one-to-one format. Alternatively, a senior resident can be paired with a new trainee under the non-direct (but immediately available) supervision of an attending physician. Resident supervision has been considered an important step towards independent practice. Both models are ubiquitous in the United States, but no study to date has been performed if one model is better than the other with respect to supervision scores.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 7, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 29, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 12, 2021

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 8, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

September 29, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 6, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Supervision evaluation questionnaire

    A series of questions pertaining to planning perianesthesia care, feedback, availability, opportunities, stimulating patient based learning, professionalism, interpersonal skills, presence, and safety. It questions are scored using a 4-point Likert scale (never = 1, rarely = 2, frequently = 3, and always = 4). A score less than 3 is associated with more frequent occurrences of mistakes.

    At the conclusion of each day for 16 consecutive days

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Short Form

    At the conclusion of each day for 16 consecutive days

Study Arms (2)

Attending physician for direct 1:1 supervision

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will be assigned to an attending physician for direct 1:1 supervision. The participants will fill out a survey at the end of the day for 16 consecutive days.

Behavioral: Survey

Senior resident for direct 1:1 supervision

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will be assigned to an senior resident as a direct supervisor with oversight from an attending physician (in accordance with CMS/ACGME staffing criteria). The participants will fill out a survey at the end of the day for 16 consecutive days.

Behavioral: Survey

Interventions

SurveyBEHAVIORAL

A survey will be completed by the participants at the conclusion of each day.

Attending physician for direct 1:1 supervisionSenior resident for direct 1:1 supervision

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • New incoming anesthesia residents assigned to healthy patients (ASA physical status classifications of 1 or 2).

You may not qualify if:

  • New incoming anesthesia residents assigned to patients with ASA physical status classifications 3 or greater.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • De Oliveira GS Jr, Rahmani R, Fitzgerald PC, Chang R, McCarthy RJ. The association between frequency of self-reported medical errors and anesthesia trainee supervision: a survey of United States anesthesiology residents-in-training. Anesth Analg. 2013 Apr;116(4):892-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318277dd65. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

    PMID: 23385057BACKGROUND
  • De Oliveira GS Jr, Dexter F, Bialek JM, McCarthy RJ. Reliability and validity of assessing subspecialty level of faculty anesthesiologists' supervision of anesthesiology residents. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):209-213. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000453.

    PMID: 25268396BACKGROUND
  • Riveros Perez E, Jimenez E, Yang N, Rocuts A. Evaluation of Anesthesiology Residents' Supervision Skills: A Tool to Assess Transition Towards Independent Practice. Cureus. 2019 Feb 26;11(2):e4137. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4137.

    PMID: 31058020BACKGROUND
  • de Oliveira Filho GR, Dal Mago AJ, Garcia JH, Goldschmidt R. An instrument designed for faculty supervision evaluation by anesthesia residents and its psychometric properties. Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1316-22. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318182fbdd.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Christopher Malgieri, MD

    Rhode Island Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2021

First Posted

October 12, 2021

Study Start

July 7, 2021

Primary Completion

July 30, 2022

Study Completion

July 30, 2022

Last Updated

February 8, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations