NCT05074745

Brief Summary

The main objective is to expand screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of the RT-PCR test (Cobas® Roche, Switzerland) and the ELISA Point of Contact Testing (PORTABLE COVID-19 ANTIGEN LAB® Stark, Italy) on buccal swab compared to the reference test, the RT-PCR test (Cobas® Roche, Switzerland) on nasopharyngeal swab. Secondary objectives

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of oral swab RT-PCR and POCT relative to the quantitative amplification (Ct) values of the NP Swab RT-PCR assay.
  • Analyze RT-PCR amplification cycle thresholds (Ct) and POCT diagnostic accuracy as a function of the presence and timing of symptoms.
  • Among symptomatic participants, compare clinical presentations between positive and negative participants on the NP swab RT-PCR test.
  • The RT-PCR test may be imperfectly sensitive, ranging from 71 to 98%3. Using a Bayesian latent class model, the investigators will assess the true accuracy of POCT as it does not require the assumption that any one test or combination of tests is perfect14,15.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,500

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 18, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 7, 2021

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 12, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 27, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

October 7, 2021

Last Update Submit

October 19, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2POCTRT-PCRContact caseELISABuccal

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive patients for the two different sampling types (buccal vs nasopharyngeal) and two methods (ELISA POCT vs RT-PCR)

    Number of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive patients by sampling type (buccal and nasopharyngeal swab) and analytical method (ELISA POCT vs RT-PC)

    48 Hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of Ct values in buccal and nasopharyngeal swabs

    48 Hours

Study Arms (1)

Buccal and nasopharyngeal swabs

EXPERIMENTAL

One patient will have 3 swabs taken, 2 buccal for PCR and ELISA POCT, 1 nasopharyngeal for PCR

Diagnostic Test: ELISA POCT vs RT-PCR

Interventions

ELISA POCT vs RT-PCRDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

3 swabs taken, buccal for RT-PCR and ELISA POCT, nasopharyngeal for RT-PCR

Buccal and nasopharyngeal swabs

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • + patient eligible for COVID-19 testing in Monaco
  • symptoms suggestive of COVID-19
  • contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19

You may not qualify if:

  • refusal to participate in the study
  • preventive screening of professional groups
  • inability to return to the screening center within 48-72 hours of the first visit.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre National de Depistage - Espace Leo Ferre

Monaco, 98000, Monaco

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Althaus T, Blake A, Costantini A, Lavagna C, Jacquesson E, Groshenry G, Troel A, Vanzo B, Dejoux O, Raps H, Rampal P, Voiglio EJ. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive SARS-CoV-2 screening tests: a national prospective analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 21;25(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11088-x.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

COVID-19

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pneumonia, ViralPneumoniaRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsVirus DiseasesCoronavirus InfectionsCoronaviridae InfectionsNidovirales InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Eric VOIGLIO, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Monocentric, Prospective, 3 components Nasopharyngeal swab by PCR Buccal swab by PCR Buccal by ELISA POCT
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2021

First Posted

October 12, 2021

Study Start

February 18, 2021

Primary Completion

December 30, 2021

Study Completion

December 30, 2021

Last Updated

October 27, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations