Comparison of Effects of Atorvastatin Versus Rosuvastatin on Cardiac Function in Heart Failure Patients
ASTRO-CHF
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Statins have a protective effect in patients with established heart failure because of their lipid-lowering and pleiotropic effects. There is no randomized controlled trial comparing lipophilic versus hydrophilic statins in these patients (head to head comparison). The best evidence so far is from a meta-analysis in which the authors did an adjusted indirect comparison between lipophilic statins and rosuvastatin and found that lipophilic statins were associated with significantly lower incidence of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and hospitalization for worsening heart failure compared to rosuvastatin (hydrophilic statin) among patients with heart failure. So, the investigators plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on cardiac function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Oct 2019
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2022
CompletedOctober 19, 2021
October 1, 2021
2.7 years
September 28, 2021
October 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To compare the effect of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on LVEF
Change from baseline in Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by 2D Echocardiography after atorvastatin or rosuvastatin treatment
Measurements at enrolment (baseline), 3 month and 6 months
To compare the effect of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on NT-ProBNP
Change from baseline in NT-ProBNP (cardiac marker) after atorvastatin or rosuvastatin treatment.
Measurements at enrolment (baseline), 3 months and 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
To compare the effect of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on IL-6
Measurements at enrolment (baseline) and 6 months
To compare the effect of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on hsCRP
Measurements at enrolment (baseline), 3 month and 6 months
To compare the effect of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (MLHFQ)
Measurements at enrolment (baseline), 3 month and 6 months
To compare the effect of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on 6-minute walk test (6MWT)
Measurements at enrolment (baseline), 3 month and 6 months
Compare incidence of hospitalization for worsening of heart failure at 6 months in atorvastatin and rosuvastatin group
Analysis at 6 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Atorvastatin arm
EXPERIMENTALTablet Atorvastatin 40mg once daily at bed-time given for 6 months
Rosuvastatin arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORTablet Rosuvastatin 20mg once daily at bed-time given for 6 months
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Either gender,18-65 years of age
- Left ventricular ejection fraction \<40% as assessed by 2D echocardiography
- NYHA class II-III
- CHF patients currently optimized on standard treatment for at least 1 month before enrolment and on an OPD basis treatment
- Ready to give written informed consent
- Willing to comply with the study protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity to statins
- NYHA class IV patient
- Serum creatinine \>3 mg/dl
- Significant liver disease: SGOT/SGPT \>3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or \>2.5 times the ULN in symptomatic patients
- Patient on an enzyme inducer or inhibitor currently
- Any malignancy or patient on chemotherapeutic agents
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Patients who have participated in another trial within the past 3 months
- Patient with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c \>7 g%)/ uncontrolled hypertension (BP \>140/90 mmHg despite in ≥3 antihypertensive drugs)
- Patient with HIV/ HBV / HCV infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Chandigarh, 160012, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ashish K Kakkar
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Patients will be randomized to two arms in ratio 1:1 using computer-generated random list. Patients, investigator and care provider will be blinded to the treatment group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2021
First Posted
October 8, 2021
Study Start
October 16, 2019
Primary Completion
June 30, 2022
Study Completion
August 31, 2022
Last Updated
October 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share