NCT05071599

Brief Summary

To evaluate the efficacy of twin arch brackets compared to conventional brackets in the control of orthodontic tooth movement.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 12, 2021

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 8, 2021

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2021

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

September 12, 2021

Last Update Submit

October 21, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Brackets

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessment of efficacy of Twin Arch brackets in orthodontic tooth movement

    Time taken for leveling and alignment phase for anterior teeth will be evaluated for each group.

    1 years

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Comfort of Twin Arch brackets .

    1 week

  • Patient acceptance or preference.

    1 year

  • Failure of brackets bonding

    2 years

  • Oral hygiene maintenance

    1.5 year

Study Arms (2)

Twin arch brackets

EXPERIMENTAL

the malocclusion for this group will be treated using fixed appliance which utilize twin arch brackets system.

Device: Twin Arch Brackets

Conventional brackets

EXPERIMENTAL

the malocclusion for this group will be treated using fixed appliance which utilize conventional "pre-adjusted edgewise "brackets system.

Device: Twin Arch Brackets

Interventions

Twin Arch Brackets characterized by double horizontal slots which make it capable to accept two arch wire at the same time which in turn can achieve a better control over orthodontic tooth movement

Also known as: Preadjusted Edgewise Brackets
Conventional bracketsTwin arch brackets

Eligibility Criteria

Age13 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age range from 13 to 18 years.
  • Full set of permanent teeth (the third molars are not considered).
  • Angle class I malocclusion with normal facial proportions.
  • Mild to moderate crowding in both arches that require treatment with fixed appliance using non extraction approach
  • No previous orthodontic or orthognathic surgery treatment.
  • Free from oral and general health problems that could interfere with orthodontic treatment..
  • All teeth should be caries-free.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with poor oral hygiene or periodontally compromised teeth.
  • History of serious medical problems or taking systemic medication which could affect orthodontic treatment.
  • History of serious dental problems (endodontic treatment, periodontal surgery, apicectomy, or any other dental problems) which could affect orthodontic treatment.
  • History of trauma, bruxism, or or parafunctional habits.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Al Azhar University

Cairo, Nasr City, 11651, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Gravina MA, Brunharo IH, Fraga MR, Artese F, Campos MJ, Vitral RW, Quintao CC. Clinical evaluation of dental alignment and leveling with three different types of orthodontic wires. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):31-7. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000600006.

    PMID: 24351147BACKGROUND
  • Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Bourauel C. A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Jun;35(3):375-80. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs029. Epub 2012 May 9.

    PMID: 22573909BACKGROUND
  • Khattab TZ, Hajeer MY, Farah H, Al-Sabbagh R. Maxillary dental arch changes following the leveling and alignment stage with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 1;15(5):561-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1579.

    PMID: 25707826BACKGROUND
  • Liaw YC, Su YY, Lai YL, Lee SY. Stiffness and frictional resistance of a superelastic nickel-titanium orthodontic wire with low-stress hysteresis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 May;131(5):578.e12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.015.

    PMID: 17482074BACKGROUND
  • Shen G, Chen RJ, Hu Z, Qian YF. The effects of a newly designed twin-slot bracket on severely malpositioned teeth--a typodont experimental study. Eur J Orthod. 2008 Aug;30(4):401-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn011.

    PMID: 18678759BACKGROUND
  • Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):480-5. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0480:ACTODV]2.0.CO;2.

    PMID: 16637731BACKGROUND
  • Yeh CL, Kusnoto B, Viana G, Evans CA, Drummond JL. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance between brackets with passive-ligation designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jun;131(6):704.e11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.041.

    PMID: 17561042BACKGROUND
  • Rinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DJ, Kapur-Wadhwa R. Orthodontic appliance design. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jan;131(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.039. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17208110BACKGROUND
  • Parkhouse RC. Current products and practice: Tip-Edge Plus. J Orthod. 2007 Mar;34(1):59-68. doi: 10.1179/146531207225021933.

    PMID: 17347298BACKGROUND
  • Miles P, Weyant R. Porcelain brackets during initial alignment: are self-ligating cosmetic brackets more efficient? Aust Orthod J. 2010 May;26(1):21-6.

    PMID: 20575195BACKGROUND
  • Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013 Apr;35(2):121-6. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232.

    PMID: 24049221BACKGROUND
  • Little RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod. 1975 Nov;68(5):554-63. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90086-x.

    PMID: 1059332BACKGROUND
  • GREENE JC, VERMILLION JR. THE SIMPLIFIED ORAL HYGIENE INDEX. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964 Jan;68:7-13. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1964.0034. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14076341BACKGROUND

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Raafat E G Mohamed, Asst Prof

    Department of orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys-Cairo), Al-Azhar University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Ahmed S Ammar, Lecturer

    Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys- Cairo), Al-Azhar University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Mohammed B Farhat, BDS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dentist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2021

First Posted

October 8, 2021

Study Start

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion

October 30, 2022

Study Completion

December 1, 2022

Last Updated

October 22, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

When the research done and I finished my master degree the research will available for the public

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
2 - 3 years
Access Criteria
Via email massages

Locations