Efficacy of Twin Arch Brackets in the Control of Orthodontic Tooth Movement
TAB
Assessment of the Efficacy of Twin Arch Brackets in the Control of Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy of twin arch brackets compared to conventional brackets in the control of orthodontic tooth movement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedOctober 22, 2021
October 1, 2021
12 months
September 12, 2021
October 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of efficacy of Twin Arch brackets in orthodontic tooth movement
Time taken for leveling and alignment phase for anterior teeth will be evaluated for each group.
1 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Comfort of Twin Arch brackets .
1 week
Patient acceptance or preference.
1 year
Failure of brackets bonding
2 years
Oral hygiene maintenance
1.5 year
Study Arms (2)
Twin arch brackets
EXPERIMENTALthe malocclusion for this group will be treated using fixed appliance which utilize twin arch brackets system.
Conventional brackets
EXPERIMENTALthe malocclusion for this group will be treated using fixed appliance which utilize conventional "pre-adjusted edgewise "brackets system.
Interventions
Twin Arch Brackets characterized by double horizontal slots which make it capable to accept two arch wire at the same time which in turn can achieve a better control over orthodontic tooth movement
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age range from 13 to 18 years.
- Full set of permanent teeth (the third molars are not considered).
- Angle class I malocclusion with normal facial proportions.
- Mild to moderate crowding in both arches that require treatment with fixed appliance using non extraction approach
- No previous orthodontic or orthognathic surgery treatment.
- Free from oral and general health problems that could interfere with orthodontic treatment..
- All teeth should be caries-free.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with poor oral hygiene or periodontally compromised teeth.
- History of serious medical problems or taking systemic medication which could affect orthodontic treatment.
- History of serious dental problems (endodontic treatment, periodontal surgery, apicectomy, or any other dental problems) which could affect orthodontic treatment.
- History of trauma, bruxism, or or parafunctional habits.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Al Azhar University
Cairo, Nasr City, 11651, Egypt
Related Publications (13)
Gravina MA, Brunharo IH, Fraga MR, Artese F, Campos MJ, Vitral RW, Quintao CC. Clinical evaluation of dental alignment and leveling with three different types of orthodontic wires. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):31-7. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000600006.
PMID: 24351147BACKGROUNDSifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Bourauel C. A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Jun;35(3):375-80. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs029. Epub 2012 May 9.
PMID: 22573909BACKGROUNDKhattab TZ, Hajeer MY, Farah H, Al-Sabbagh R. Maxillary dental arch changes following the leveling and alignment stage with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 1;15(5):561-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1579.
PMID: 25707826BACKGROUNDLiaw YC, Su YY, Lai YL, Lee SY. Stiffness and frictional resistance of a superelastic nickel-titanium orthodontic wire with low-stress hysteresis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 May;131(5):578.e12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.015.
PMID: 17482074BACKGROUNDShen G, Chen RJ, Hu Z, Qian YF. The effects of a newly designed twin-slot bracket on severely malpositioned teeth--a typodont experimental study. Eur J Orthod. 2008 Aug;30(4):401-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn011.
PMID: 18678759BACKGROUNDMiles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):480-5. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0480:ACTODV]2.0.CO;2.
PMID: 16637731BACKGROUNDYeh CL, Kusnoto B, Viana G, Evans CA, Drummond JL. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance between brackets with passive-ligation designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jun;131(6):704.e11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.041.
PMID: 17561042BACKGROUNDRinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DJ, Kapur-Wadhwa R. Orthodontic appliance design. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jan;131(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.039. No abstract available.
PMID: 17208110BACKGROUNDParkhouse RC. Current products and practice: Tip-Edge Plus. J Orthod. 2007 Mar;34(1):59-68. doi: 10.1179/146531207225021933.
PMID: 17347298BACKGROUNDMiles P, Weyant R. Porcelain brackets during initial alignment: are self-ligating cosmetic brackets more efficient? Aust Orthod J. 2010 May;26(1):21-6.
PMID: 20575195BACKGROUNDCharan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013 Apr;35(2):121-6. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232.
PMID: 24049221BACKGROUNDLittle RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod. 1975 Nov;68(5):554-63. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90086-x.
PMID: 1059332BACKGROUNDGREENE JC, VERMILLION JR. THE SIMPLIFIED ORAL HYGIENE INDEX. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964 Jan;68:7-13. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1964.0034. No abstract available.
PMID: 14076341BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Raafat E G Mohamed, Asst Prof
Department of orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys-Cairo), Al-Azhar University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ahmed S Ammar, Lecturer
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys- Cairo), Al-Azhar University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dentist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2021
First Posted
October 8, 2021
Study Start
November 1, 2021
Primary Completion
October 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 2 - 3 years
- Access Criteria
- Via email massages
When the research done and I finished my master degree the research will available for the public