Evaluation of the Effect of Robot-assisted Early Mobilization - Project MobiStaR
MobiStaR
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Within the MobiStaR project the adaptation of procedures in an intensive care unit combined with the use of this robotic system will create the conditions to increase the mobilization rate of critically ill intensive care patients significantly, possibly thereby increasing the rehabilitation outcomes for these patients and developing a new standard of care for robot-assisted early mobilization. The intervention study will assess the organizational feasibility of robot-assisted early mobilization (starting in the first 72 hours after admission to the ICU), the behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals and the effects on patient outcomes in terms of ventilation time, muscle mass (sonographic examination) and physical activity (measured by established scores such as Functional Status Score for ICU (FSS-ICU) and Medical Research Council (MRC) classification).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2022
CompletedOctober 11, 2023
October 1, 2023
7 months
August 27, 2021
October 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - Ventilation duration
changes in ventilation duration (in hours) in comparison to a historical patient group
6 months
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination Area of the M.rec.femoris
muscle mass (sonographic examination, in millimeters): Area of the M. rec. femoris in comparison to a historical patient group (in cm²)
6 months
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination thickness M. quad. femoris
muscle mass: Thickness M. quad. Femoris (in cm²) in comparison to a historical patient group
6 months
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination- motility diaphragm breathing
muscle mass: motility of the diaphragm during breathing (in cm) in comparison to a historical patient group
6 months
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination thickness diaphragm inspiration
muscle mass: Thickness of diaphragm during inspiration (in cm) in comparison to a historical patient group
6 months
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination thickness diaphragm exhalation
muscle mass: Thickness of diaphragm during exhalation (in cm) in comparison to a historical patient group
6 months
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - physical activity - FSS-ICU
physical activity measured using the score FSS-ICU (0 -35) in comparison to a historical patient group. A higher value means a better outcome.
6 months
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - physical activity
physical activity on upper and lower extremity measured using the Medical Research Council (MRC) score in comparison to a historical patient group. (0=absent muscle contraction, 1=visible muscle contraction, 2=movement when gravity is eliminated, 3=active movement against gravity, 4=active movement against resistance, 5=normal strength.)
6 months
Behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals - qualitative interviews
subjectively experienced emotions, motivating and challenging factors - evaluated with a semi-structured interview guideline
6 months
Behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals - qualitative observations
behavior and body posture during the mobilization - evaluated with a standardized observation sheet
6 months
Feasibility in organizational processes - eligible patients
Frequency of eligible patients (count per week: included patients in the study/ new eligible patients in the ICUs)
6 months
Feasibility in organizational processes - mobilizations
frequency of robot-assisted mobilizations (per patient per day)
6 months
Feasibility in organizational processes - adverse events
adverse events (count of patient-related, user-related or technology-related adverse events)
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Delir
6 months
Consciousness
6 months
Sedation level
6 months
Pain (VAS)
6 months
health related quality of life
6 months
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
patients with robot-assisted early mobilization
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients will receive a physical examination at various time points to assess physical functionality and muscle strength, as well as a sonographic examination of leg muscles, diaphragm, and lungs. These examinations should be performed on day -1 (preoperatively), on postoperative days 1,2,3, then once a week if the patient remains in the ICU, on day 28, on the day of discharge from the ICU, and on a follow-up examination approximately 3 months after discharge from the ICU.The follow-up examination should only take place if the patients present themselves at the hospital anyway due to medically indicated follow-up examinations (not study-related). Alternatively, patients can be asked about their condition by telephone.
patients with conventional early mobilization (historic group)
NO INTERVENTIONAll patients fulfill the same criteria like the intervention group and receive conventional early mobilization.
Interventions
The robot used for early mobilization is able to verticalize the patients in their bed without transfer and to generate a movement of the legs that measures and supports the patients' own movement. The device meets the requirements for mobilizing critically ill patients in an intensive care unit, maintaining hygiene standards and providing the best possible support for the patient's own movement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- planned surgical intervention
- postoperative intensive medical and therapeutic treatment
- expected duration of ventilation \> 48 hours
- age ≥ 18 years
- preoperative informed consent by the patients in the study
- weight \>45 kg and \<135 kg
- body height \>1.50 m and \<1.95 m
You may not qualify if:
- patient refusal to participate in the study
- unable to give consent
- clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 7
- chronic ventilation (over 24h) before ICU admission
- increased intracranial pressure / risk for increased intracranial pressure / recent cerebral hemorrhage
- pregnancy
- pre-existing neuromuscular disease resulting in chronic limitation of strength and efficiency
- sternotomy / sternectomy during surgical procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
LudwigMaximilians
Munich, Bavaria, 81337, Germany
Related Publications (3)
Huebner L, Warmbein A, Scharf C, Schroeder I, Manz K, Rathgeber I, Gutmann M, Biebl J, Mehler-Klamt A, Huber J, Eberl I, Kraft E, Fischer U, Zoller M. Effects of robotic-assisted early mobilization versus conventional mobilization in intensive care unit patients: prospective interventional cohort study with retrospective control group analysis. Crit Care. 2024 Apr 6;28(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04896-1.
PMID: 38582934DERIVEDWarmbein A, Hubner L, Rathgeber I, Mehler-Klamt AC, Huber J, Schroeder I, Scharf C, Gutmann M, Biebl J, Manz K, Kraft E, Eberl I, Zoller M, Fischer U. Robot-assisted early mobilization for intensive care unit patients: Feasibility and first-time clinical use. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Apr;152:104702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104702. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
PMID: 38350342DERIVEDWarmbein A, Schroeder I, Mehler-Klamt A, Rathgeber I, Huber J, Scharf C, Hubner L, Gutmann M, Biebl J, Lorenz A, Kraft E, Zoller M, Eberl I, Fischer U. Robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Nov 5;8(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01191-0.
PMID: 36333746DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Zoller, PD Dr.
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Inge Eberl, Prof. Dr.
Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eduard Kraft, PD Dr.
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Uli Fischer, Dr.
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of executive department nursing science
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2021
First Posted
October 8, 2021
Study Start
September 15, 2021
Primary Completion
April 15, 2022
Study Completion
May 15, 2022
Last Updated
October 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10