Rate Control Self-adjustment in Patients With Permanent or Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using Device Home Monitoring
Personalized Medicine: Home Monitoring as a Tool to Patient Empowerment. Rate Control Self-adjustment in Patients With Permanent or Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Information
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation require rate control medication to prevent excessive tachycardia. Since too much medication leads to a lower than expected heart rate (low output and symptoms) and too little leads to a fast heart rate (with associated symptoms), finding the ideal medication level (target that could fluctuate) is vital for patient's wellbeing. Clinicians adjust the medication each time patients come into the clinic (once or twice a year). In between those visits, medication is not changed even though patients would benefit for some incremental medication adjustment. Patients implanted with Biotronik devices have access to Home Monitoring® (HM), a user friendly remote monitoring system transmitting daily device and patient information to clinicians. Heart rate and activity hours can be tracked and this information could be used to adjust medication. In a step by step process, patients will gradually gain autonomy in the weekly adjustment of their rate control medication. In order to guide medication adjustment by patients, the research team will filter and simplify the information received by HM before sending it to patients. It is hypothesize that patient empowerment, understanding the dynamics of their heart rates in relation to the amount of medication used, will lead to better heart rate control, and it will improve the daily hours of patients activity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2025
CompletedMay 26, 2022
May 1, 2022
2 years
June 12, 2021
May 25, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
6 minutes walk test
Difference in meters walked between first and last 6 minutes walk test
Baseline, end of the study (12 months after first 6 minute walk test)
Heart rate control target
Number of weeks where the heart rate is between 80 and 110 beats per minute
Through study completion, up to 1 year
Physical activity during the day
Percentage of physical activity during the day measured by the pacemaker accelerometer at the end of each week
Through study completion, up to 1 year
Study Arms (1)
Participants in gradual self-adjustment rate control medication
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive a weekly simplified version of the information transmitted by the HM system. In the first 3 months, using that information, the physician changes or not the rate control medication posology (i.e. if the mean heart rate is 60bpm, betablocker dose is cut to half, and another heart rate evaluation is done a week later, and if heart rate is now 120bpm the dose is increased to a 3/4 of the initial dose, and so on). After those three initial months where physician guide titration, the patient is allowed to make self-adjustment of their medication accordingly to the information received (i.e. increasing or decreasing their rate control medication depending on heart rates and activity hours per day.
Interventions
Each week, based on the information provided by HM (heart rate and hours of activity each day), the rate control medication is adjusted to increase the total of activity time.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation, on rate control medication stable for at least 6 months
- patients with a Biotronik pacemaker connected to HM system
You may not qualify if:
- patients with heart failure in need of maximum beta blocker titration
- patients with other indications that would prevent medication adjustment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHUS Fleurimont
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4, Canada
Related Publications (4)
Van Gelder IC, Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, Tuininga YS, Tijssen JG, Alings AM, Hillege HL, Bergsma-Kadijk JA, Cornel JH, Kamp O, Tukkie R, Bosker HA, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Van den Berg MP; RACE II Investigators. Lenient versus strict rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 15;362(15):1363-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001337. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
PMID: 20231232BACKGROUNDYee R, Verma A, Beardsall M, Fraser J, Philippon F, Exner DV. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the use of remote monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic device follow-up. Can J Cardiol. 2013 Jun;29(6):644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.036. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
PMID: 23465345BACKGROUNDChronaki CE, Vardas P. Remote monitoring costs, benefits, and reimbursement: a European perspective. Europace. 2013 Jun;15 Suppl 1:i59-i64. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut110.
PMID: 23737233BACKGROUNDSlotwiner D, Varma N, Akar JG, Annas G, Beardsall M, Fogel RI, Galizio NO, Glotzer TV, Leahy RA, Love CJ, McLean RC, Mittal S, Morichelli L, Patton KK, Raitt MH, Ricci RP, Rickard J, Schoenfeld MH, Serwer GA, Shea J, Varosy P, Verma A, Yu CM. HRS Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):e69-100. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 14. No abstract available.
PMID: 25981148BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Felix Alejandro Ayala Paredes, MD PhD
Sherbrooke university medical school
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Cardiologist, electrophysiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 12, 2021
First Posted
October 4, 2021
Study Start
July 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 15, 2024
Study Completion
June 15, 2025
Last Updated
May 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share