NCT05066971

Brief Summary

Patients with permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation require rate control medication to prevent excessive tachycardia. Since too much medication leads to a lower than expected heart rate (low output and symptoms) and too little leads to a fast heart rate (with associated symptoms), finding the ideal medication level (target that could fluctuate) is vital for patient's wellbeing. Clinicians adjust the medication each time patients come into the clinic (once or twice a year). In between those visits, medication is not changed even though patients would benefit for some incremental medication adjustment. Patients implanted with Biotronik devices have access to Home Monitoring® (HM), a user friendly remote monitoring system transmitting daily device and patient information to clinicians. Heart rate and activity hours can be tracked and this information could be used to adjust medication. In a step by step process, patients will gradually gain autonomy in the weekly adjustment of their rate control medication. In order to guide medication adjustment by patients, the research team will filter and simplify the information received by HM before sending it to patients. It is hypothesize that patient empowerment, understanding the dynamics of their heart rates in relation to the amount of medication used, will lead to better heart rate control, and it will improve the daily hours of patients activity.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 4, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2022

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 15, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 26, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 25, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Atrial fibrillationPatient empowermentPersonalized medicineRate control

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • 6 minutes walk test

    Difference in meters walked between first and last 6 minutes walk test

    Baseline, end of the study (12 months after first 6 minute walk test)

  • Heart rate control target

    Number of weeks where the heart rate is between 80 and 110 beats per minute

    Through study completion, up to 1 year

  • Physical activity during the day

    Percentage of physical activity during the day measured by the pacemaker accelerometer at the end of each week

    Through study completion, up to 1 year

Study Arms (1)

Participants in gradual self-adjustment rate control medication

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive a weekly simplified version of the information transmitted by the HM system. In the first 3 months, using that information, the physician changes or not the rate control medication posology (i.e. if the mean heart rate is 60bpm, betablocker dose is cut to half, and another heart rate evaluation is done a week later, and if heart rate is now 120bpm the dose is increased to a 3/4 of the initial dose, and so on). After those three initial months where physician guide titration, the patient is allowed to make self-adjustment of their medication accordingly to the information received (i.e. increasing or decreasing their rate control medication depending on heart rates and activity hours per day.

Combination Product: Self-adjustment of medication

Interventions

Each week, based on the information provided by HM (heart rate and hours of activity each day), the rate control medication is adjusted to increase the total of activity time.

Participants in gradual self-adjustment rate control medication

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation, on rate control medication stable for at least 6 months
  • patients with a Biotronik pacemaker connected to HM system

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with heart failure in need of maximum beta blocker titration
  • patients with other indications that would prevent medication adjustment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHUS Fleurimont

Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4, Canada

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Van Gelder IC, Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, Tuininga YS, Tijssen JG, Alings AM, Hillege HL, Bergsma-Kadijk JA, Cornel JH, Kamp O, Tukkie R, Bosker HA, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Van den Berg MP; RACE II Investigators. Lenient versus strict rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 15;362(15):1363-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001337. Epub 2010 Mar 15.

    PMID: 20231232BACKGROUND
  • Yee R, Verma A, Beardsall M, Fraser J, Philippon F, Exner DV. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the use of remote monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic device follow-up. Can J Cardiol. 2013 Jun;29(6):644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.036. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

    PMID: 23465345BACKGROUND
  • Chronaki CE, Vardas P. Remote monitoring costs, benefits, and reimbursement: a European perspective. Europace. 2013 Jun;15 Suppl 1:i59-i64. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut110.

    PMID: 23737233BACKGROUND
  • Slotwiner D, Varma N, Akar JG, Annas G, Beardsall M, Fogel RI, Galizio NO, Glotzer TV, Leahy RA, Love CJ, McLean RC, Mittal S, Morichelli L, Patton KK, Raitt MH, Ricci RP, Rickard J, Schoenfeld MH, Serwer GA, Shea J, Varosy P, Verma A, Yu CM. HRS Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):e69-100. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 14. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25981148BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial FibrillationPatient Participation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Felix Alejandro Ayala Paredes, MD PhD

    Sherbrooke university medical school

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Felix Alejandro Ayala Paredes, MD PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: All participants follow the same intervention
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Cardiologist, electrophysiologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2021

First Posted

October 4, 2021

Study Start

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion

June 15, 2024

Study Completion

June 15, 2025

Last Updated

May 26, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations