Comparison Between Extended Cryoablation, Standard Cryoablation, and Radiofrequency Ablation
EXCAPE-AF
Comparison of Extended Cryoballoon Ablation, Standard Cryoballoon Ablation, and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
288
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to test the efficacy hypothesis that extended cryoballoon ablation is superior to either standard cryoballoon ablation or radiofrequency ablation
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 28, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2025
CompletedJune 24, 2025
June 1, 2025
3.4 years
May 12, 2025
June 22, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the incidence rates of atrial tachyarrhythmias
Incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation, flutter, or tachycardia) lasting \>30 seconds after discontinuation of antiarrhythmic therapy, assessed following a 3-month blanking period
3-month blanking period post-procedure
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Atrial arrhythmia recurrence during blanking period
during blanking period (3 months)
Atrial tachycardia or flutter recurrence
1 year
Atrial fibrillation recurrence
1 year
Incidence of peri-procedural complications
Periprocedural
Rate of first-pass isolation or first-freeze isolation
during procedure
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Extended cryoballoon ablation
EXPERIMENTALThe method of ablation, size of balloon, freezing time, and booster freezing will be decided by the participating center's policy or physician's discretion. Ablation strategies described above are highly recommended for all participants. Additional posterior wall isolation should be performed by single 120 to 180 second CB application delivered at each site. Maximal posterior wall debulking should be attempted, although complete isolation may not always be achievable, as we considered that a large scar created by the CB application would provide sufficient anti-arrhythmic effects in terms of suppressing AF. The number and duration of CB application should be recorded in the case report form. Successful posterior wall isolation should be determined by 3-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping or differential pacing. The method and achievement of posterior wall isolation should be recorded in the case report form.
Standard cryoballoon ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORApplication of TTI + 2 minutes or 180 seconds single-freezing is recommended when time-to-isolation (TTI) \<60 seconds. Additional 120 seconds of booster-freezing after TTI + 2 or 180 seconds initial freezing is recommended when TTI value \>60 seconds, or PV potentials were not discernable in the Achieve multipolar catheter. If temperatures below -40°C cannot be achieved due to improper occlusion or TTI \> 90 seconds, freezing should be discontinued and reposition of balloon is recommended. Segmental ablation is allowed when the proper occlusion of PV by balloon cannot be achieved. Continuous phrenic capture should be monitored during the procedure in the right PVs to avoid phrenic nerve injury. Stop ablation immediately if phrenic nerve damage is suspected. No further ablation would be performed if the phrenic nerve damage is suspected. Touch-up ablation using irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter would be permitted with conventional mapping method.
Radiofrequency ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORCARTO system (Biosense-Webster, USA): Ablation index (AI) CLOSE protocol . Navistar Smart-touch surround-flow catheter; 25-40 watts of energy; 40 seconds time limit; 10-30 gram of contact force; 40 seconds time limit; targeting AI value of 550 in anterior wall and 400 in the posterior wall; interlesion distance ≤6mm; using automatic lesion annotation (Visitag™) - type 3 tagging, 3mm stability for 5 seconds, force \>5g over 50% of time; target AI value could be reduced (450 in anterior wall and 350 in posterior wall) according to the participating center's policy. Ensite NavX system (Abbott, USA) : TactiCath™ Quartz ablation catheter; delivering 25-35 watts of energy; 40 seconds time limit; 10-30 gram of contact force; using automatic lesion annotation (Automark Module), target lesion index value of 5-5.5 in the posterior wall and 5.5-6 in the anterior wall.
Interventions
Cryoablation of pulmonary veins + posterior wall isolation
Standard cryoablation of pulmonary veins
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 18-80 years
- Patients with persistent (≥7 days) AF documented on 12-lead ECG or Holter monitoring.
- AF refractory/intolerant to class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent to CB or RF ablation and participation in this investigation
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years old or \>80 years old
- Paroxysmal AF lasting \<7 days
- Mitral stenosis or mechanical prosthetic valve
- Patients with left atrial size ≥ 50 mm (2D echocardiography, Anterior-posterior diameter in parasternal long axis view)
- Anatomy of pulmonary vein not suitable for standard CB or extended CB, including common ostium or ostium size \> 26mm
- Pregnant woman of childbearing age with a positive pregnancy test before treatment
- Presence of atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale closure device
- Presence of intracardiac thrombus
- Contraindications to the systemic anticoagulation
- NYHA functional class IV heart failure
- Prior catheter or surgical ablation of AF
- Acute coronary syndrome within 3 months
- Planned open heart surgery within 3 months
- Prior open-heart surgery within 3 months
- End stage renal disease or chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate \[MDRD method\] \< 30mL/min/1.73m²)
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505, South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2025
First Posted
June 24, 2025
Study Start
September 28, 2021
Primary Completion
February 28, 2025
Study Completion
February 28, 2025
Last Updated
June 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share