NCT05064683

Brief Summary

Purpose: Newborns go through biochemical and physiological changes involving all their systems in the first days of their lives and may experience difficulties in adapting to extrauterine life due to various reasons. For newborns whose systems are still immature, leaving the warm, dark, quiet, calm, fluid-filled mother's womb and placing them in the intensive care unit with many stimuli creates intense stress and negatively affects the sleep-wake order necessary for brain development and maturation. Newborns have extensive sleep requirements for the development of their neurosensory system. It is known that the brain activity of newborns in the intrauterine period is similar to the REM (Rapid Eye Movement) sleep activity, and they sleep more than adults and spend most of their sleep in the REM sleep period.Therefore, sleep quality in the newborn period is directly related to healthy development.In this direction, our research was carried out to examine the effects of fetal position and white noise on stress and sleep in newborns with nasal CPAP(Continuous Positive Airway Pressure). Design and Methods: . This randomized experimental study was conducted on 108 newborns at the gestational week of 26 or higher in the newborn intensive care unit of a university hospital. The researcher applied white noise (n:36), and facilitated tucking(n:36) to the newborns. The control group (n: 36) received no intervention except for the routine clinical practices. Facilitated tucking white noise interventions were applied to the newborns included in study for 24 hours, their stress levels were monitored with the neonatal stress scale, and their sleep durations were monitored with a sleep-wakefulness measurement device and recorded in the newborn follow-up form. Statistical analysis was performed using percentages, means, and ANOVA test.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
108

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2021

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 22, 2021

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 4, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 4, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 15, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

September 22, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 14, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

newbornsleepstresswhite noisefacilitated tucking

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in sleep

    Nurses followed the sleep duration of newborns with a sleep-wake measurement device for 24 hours and recorded in the Newborn Follow-up Form.

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in stress

    24 hours

Study Arms (3)

white noise

EXPERIMENTAL

The newborns in the white noise group were listened to white noise for 24 hours using an Mp3 player and a decibel measuring device to measure the sound level.

Other: white noise

facilitated tucking

EXPERIMENTAL

The newborns in the facilitated tucking were given supine, prone, and lateral positions for 24 hours, depending on their clinical status.

Other: white noise

control

NO INTERVENTION

Newborns in the control group did not receive any treatment other than routine applications while receiving Nasal CPAP support in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Interventions

Newborns in the control group did not receive any treatment other than routine applications while receiving nasal CPAP support in the neonatal intensive care unit.The newborns in the faciliated tucking group were given supine, prone, and lateral positions for 24 hours, depending on their clinical status.The newborns in the white noise group were listened to white noise for 24 hours using an Mp3 player and a decibel measuring device to measure the sound level.

Also known as: facilitated tucking, control
facilitated tuckingwhite noise

Eligibility Criteria

Age0 Days - 1 Month
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients at 26 and above gestational weeks receiving nasal CPAP support.
  • Newborns who do not have a health problem that prevents them from being positioned
  • Newborns regularly visited by their mothers in neonatal intensive care clinics

You may not qualify if:

  • Congenital anomaly of the newborn
  • Newborns with hearing loss

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Inonu University

Malatya, 44280, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Çalışır H, Güler F. Yenidoğan Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Mekanik Ventilasyon Uygulanan Prematüre Bebeklere Pozisyon Verme.Türkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci. 2017;9(3):227-23.2 .

    BACKGROUND
  • Huang YS, Paiva T, Hsu JF, Kuo MC, Guilleminault C. Sleep and breathing in premature infants at 6 months post-natal age. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Dec 16;14:303. doi: 10.1186/s12887-014-0303-6.

    PMID: 25510740BACKGROUND
  • Kurt FY, Aytekin A, Çelebi A. 0-3 Yaş Çocuklarda Uyku Sorunlarının Belirlenmesi. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni. 2018;49(3), 259-263.

    BACKGROUND
  • Küçük S. Yenidoğan yoğun bakım ünitelerinde kaliteli uyku.Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi. 2015; 8(3): 214-217.

    BACKGROUND
  • Arpaci T, Altay N. Yenidoğan Yoğun Bakım Ünitelerinde Bireyselleştirilmiş Gelişimsel Bakım: Güncel Yaklaşımlar. Turkiye Klinikleri Hemşirelik Bilimleri. 2017;9(3): 245-54

    BACKGROUND
  • Başkan AK, Salihoğlu Ö, Tan İ, Akyol B, Hatipoğlu S. İnvaziv Mekanik Ventilatör Desteği Alan Yenidoğanlarda Morbidite ve Mortalite Analizi. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations. 2012; 3 (4): 483-492.

    BACKGROUND
  • Dewez JE, Chellani H, Nangia S, Metsis K, Smith H, Mathai M, van den Broek N. Healthcare workers' views on the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in neonates: a qualitative study in Andhra Pradesh, India. BMC Pediatr. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1311-8.

    PMID: 30400844BACKGROUND
  • Cakici M, Mutlu B. Effect of Body Position on Cardiorespiratory Stabilization and Comfort in Preterm Infants on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure. J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Sep-Oct;54:e1-e8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

    PMID: 32680615BACKGROUND
  • Tiryaki Ö, Çınar N . Devamlı Pozitif Hava Yolu Basıncındaki Yenidoğanın Hemşirelik Bakımı. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2016; 8(1):79-85.

    BACKGROUND
  • Houck CS. Neonatal Pain Management. Pediatric Pain Management for Primary Care, America. 2005, s.361.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ward-Larson C, Horn RA, Gosnell F. The efficacy of facilitated tucking for relieving procedural pain of endotracheal suctioning in very low birthweight infants. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2004 May-Jun;29(3):151-6; quiz 157-8. doi: 10.1097/00005721-200405000-00004.

    PMID: 15123970BACKGROUND
  • Hill S, Engle S, Jorgensen J, Kralik A, Whitman K. Effects of facilitated tucking during routine care of infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2005 Summer;17(2):158-63. doi: 10.1097/01.pep.0000163097.38957.ec.

    PMID: 16357666BACKGROUND
  • Axelin A, Salantera S, Lehtonen L. 'Facilitated tucking by parents' in pain management of preterm infants-a randomized crossover trial. Early Hum Dev. 2006 Apr;82(4):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.09.012. Epub 2006 Jan 10.

    PMID: 16410042BACKGROUND
  • Obeidat H, Kahalaf I, Callister LC, Froelicher ES. Use of facilitated tucking for nonpharmacological pain management in preterm infants: a systematic review. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2009 Oct-Dec;23(4):372-7. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181bdcf77.

    PMID: 19915422BACKGROUND
  • Huang CM, Tung WS, Kuo LL, Ying-Ju C. Comparison of pain responses of premature infants to the heelstick between containment and swaddling. J Nurs Res. 2004 Mar;12(1):31-40. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000387486.78685.c5.

    PMID: 15136961BACKGROUND
  • Johnston CC, Fernandes AM, Campbell-Yeo M. Pain in neonates is different. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3 Suppl):S65-S73. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Oct 23.

    PMID: 20971562BACKGROUND
  • Chorna OD, Slaughter JC, Wang L, Stark AR, Maitre NL. A pacifier-activated music player with mother's voice improves oral feeding in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2014 Mar;133(3):462-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2547. Epub 2014 Feb 17.

    PMID: 24534413BACKGROUND
  • Kucukoglu S, Aytekin A, Celebioglu A, Celebi A, Caner I, Maden R. Effect of White Noise in Relieving Vaccination Pain in Premature Infants. Pain Manag Nurs. 2016 Dec;17(6):392-400. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

    PMID: 27751753BACKGROUND
  • Standley JM. Music therapy for the neonate. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews. 2001;1:211-216.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Facilitated Tucking

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Infant CareChild CareHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Researcher assistant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2021

First Posted

October 1, 2021

Study Start

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion

February 4, 2022

Study Completion

February 4, 2022

Last Updated

March 15, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations