NCT05059795

Brief Summary

In critically ill patients with liver disease like cirrhosis or ACLF, fluid therapy needs to be instituted after identification of patients who will be fluid responsive and initiate appropriate inotropes early to prevent the mortality associated with fluid overload. The parameters and methodology used for assessing fluid responsiveness have been studied earlier, but the optimum method is not established. Existing recommendations based on data regarding fluid responsiveness and choice of fluid for resuscitation from intensive care units in general cannot be applied to those with liver disease as the hemodynamic alterations that occur with liver disease, presence of hypoalbuminemia at baseline and presence of cardiac dysfunction interfere with the conventional methods of fluid status assessment, fluid responsiveness as well as the response to different types of resuscitation fluids. Therefore the investigators attempt to compare various methods to estimate current intravascular volume status of patient which could be helpful in guiding fluid therapy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
350

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2020

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 4, 2020

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 28, 2021

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 10, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 2, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.4 years

First QC Date

July 4, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 25, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Resuscitation in cirrhosisInferior vena cava dynamicsCentral Venous Pressure in cirrhosisLactate clearance in cirrhosisAcute-on-chronic liver failureSepsis in CirrhosisShock in ACLF and Cirrhosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Achievement of Mean Arterial pressure >65 mmHg

    At the end of 4 hours since admission (time zero)

Secondary Outcomes (29)

  • Requirement of vasopressors

    At the end of 4 hours of admission

  • Requirement of vasopressors

    At the end of 24 hours of admission

  • Volume of fluid infused

    At the end of 4 hours of admission

  • Volume of fluid infused

    At the end of 24 hours of admission

  • Volume of fluid infused

    At the end of 36 hours of admission

  • +24 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Cirrhosis/ACLF of any etiology

Drug: Albumin + electrolyte solutionDiagnostic Test: POCUS guided fluid resuscitation

Interventions

Type of resuscitation fluid, dose and use of inotrope

Also known as: Crystalloid
Cirrhosis/ACLF of any etiology

Conventional goal directed therapy

Cirrhosis/ACLF of any etiology

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients 18-65 years age with cirrhosis of any etiology now presenting with sepsis induced hypotension

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical/Imaging or Biopsy proven liver cirrhosis of any etiology
  • Hypotension (MAP \<65mmHg or SBP \<90mmHg)
  • yrs of age

You may not qualify if:

  • Already received colloid or 2 litres of fluid within the first 2 hours of presentation, without echocardiographic assessment.
  • Already on vasopressors/inotropes
  • Severe pre-existing cardiopulmonary disease
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
  • Active bleeding like variceal bleed 28
  • Cerebrovascular events
  • Chronic renal disease - End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)/ patient on renal replacement therapy
  • Admission to ICU following liver transplantation, burns, cardiac surgery
  • Brain death or likely brain death within 24 hours
  • Previous adverse reaction to human albumin solution
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Informed consent refused by patient or attendants

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

PGIMER

Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160012, India

Location

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Chandigarh, 160012, India

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Moreau R, Hadengue A, Soupison T, Kirstetter P, Mamzer MF, Vanjak D, Vauquelin P, Assous M, Sicot C. Septic shock in patients with cirrhosis: hemodynamic and metabolic characteristics and intensive care unit outcome. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):746-50. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199206000-00008.

    PMID: 1597026BACKGROUND
  • ARISE Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group; Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Cameron PA, Cooper DJ, Higgins AM, Holdgate A, Howe BD, Webb SA, Williams P. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1496-506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404380. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

    PMID: 25272316BACKGROUND
  • Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):172-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2331.

    PMID: 18628220BACKGROUND
  • Bentzer P, Griesdale DE, Boyd J, MacLean K, Sirounis D, Ayas NT. Will This Hemodynamically Unstable Patient Respond to a Bolus of Intravenous Fluids? JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1298-309. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12310.

    PMID: 27673307BACKGROUND
  • Velissaris D, Pierrakos C, Scolletta S, De Backer D, Vincent JL. High mixed venous oxygen saturation levels do not exclude fluid responsiveness in critically ill septic patients. Crit Care. 2011 Jul 26;15(4):R177. doi: 10.1186/cc10326.

    PMID: 21791090BACKGROUND
  • Lee YK, Hwang SY, Shin TG, Jo IJ, Suh GY, Jeon K. Prognostic Value of Lactate and Central Venous Oxygen Saturation after Early Resuscitation in Sepsis Patients. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):e0153305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153305. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27054713BACKGROUND
  • Lee J, de Louw E, Niemi M, Nelson R, Mark RG, Celi LA, Mukamal KJ, Danziger J. Association between fluid balance and survival in critically ill patients. J Intern Med. 2015 Apr;277(4):468-77. doi: 10.1111/joim.12274. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

    PMID: 24931482BACKGROUND
  • Sefidbakht S, Assadsangabi R, Abbasi HR, Nabavizadeh A. Sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava as a predictor of shock in trauma patients. Emerg Radiol. 2007 Jul;14(3):181-5. doi: 10.1007/s10140-007-0602-4. Epub 2007 Jun 1.

    PMID: 17541661BACKGROUND
  • Premkumar M, Rangegowda D, Kajal K, Khumuckham JS. Noninvasive estimation of intravascular volume status in cirrhosis by dynamic size and collapsibility indices of the inferior vena cava using bedside echocardiography. JGH Open. 2019 Mar 12;3(4):322-328. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12166. eCollection 2019 Aug.

    PMID: 31406926BACKGROUND
  • Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Schoonderbeek FJ, Sleeswijk Visser SJ, van der Klooster JM, Lima AP, Willemsen SP, Bakker J; LACTATE study group. Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep 15;182(6):752-61. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200912-1918OC. Epub 2010 May 12.

    PMID: 20463176BACKGROUND
  • Du W, Liu DW, Wang XT, Long Y, Chai WZ, Zhou X, Rui X. Combining central venous-to-arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide difference and central venous oxygen saturation to guide resuscitation in septic shock. J Crit Care. 2013 Dec;28(6):1110.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.07.049.

    PMID: 24216336BACKGROUND
  • Izzy M, VanWagner LB, Lin G, Altieri M, Findlay JY, Oh JK, Watt KD, Lee SS; Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy Consortium. Redefining Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy for the Modern Era. Hepatology. 2020 Jan;71(1):334-345. doi: 10.1002/hep.30875. Epub 2019 Oct 11.

    PMID: 31342529BACKGROUND

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Plasma and Urine Samples

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver CirrhosisSepsisAcute-On-Chronic Liver FailureFibrosis

Interventions

AlbuminsCrystalloid Solutions

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Liver DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsInfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationLiver Failure, AcuteLiver FailureHepatic Insufficiency

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assitant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2020

First Posted

September 28, 2021

Study Start

February 1, 2020

Primary Completion

July 1, 2025

Study Completion

August 10, 2025

Last Updated

September 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations