PTNS and PFR in the Treatment of Childhood Constipation
Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation and Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation in the Treatment of Childhood Constipation
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Constipation is the most common complaint in childhood, affecting an estimated 20% of children globally. At present, the treatment of children's constipation is full of challenges, and treatment methods are diverse. Studies have shown that pelvic floor dysfunction is a common cause of intractable constipation in children. Zhang et al. have confirmed the role of pelvic floor dysfunction in pediatric constipation. At present, the main methods for pelvic floor dysfunction include surface electromyography and anorectal manometry which have been widely used in children with constipation and they are helpful for the diagnosis of pelvic floor dysfunction in children with constipation. Sacral nerve electrical stimulation combined with pelvic floor rehabilitation is an effective method for the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction. It offers a novel approach for the treatment of intractable constipation with pelvic floor dysfunction . At present, there are many methods for sacral nerve regulation. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), another peripheral nerve electrical stimulation approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, has the same effect as sacral nerve regulation, and has the advantages of small trauma, safety, and convenience. However, there is still a lack of evidence-based support for the treatment of childhood constipation by PTNS combine with PFR. Therefore, in this study, a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of PTNS combine with PFR in the treatment of childhood constipation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 8, 2021
CompletedNovember 22, 2023
November 1, 2023
2.6 years
September 6, 2021
November 20, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
change of CSBMs (sub/week) from baseline
Rate of defecation without drugs or other auxiliary methods
Baseline
change of CSBMs (sub/week) from baseline
Rate of defecation without drugs or other auxiliary methods
at the end of 4-weeks PTNS and PFR treatment
change of CSBMs (sub/week) from baseline
Rate of defecation without drugs or other auxiliary methods
at the end of 12 weeks follow-up
Satisfaction with bowel function
Satisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as the number of which were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).
Baseline
Satisfaction with bowel function Satisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as whether they were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).
Satisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as the number of which were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).
at the end of 4-weeks PTNS and PFR treatment
Satisfaction with bowel function Satisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as the number of which were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).
Satisfaction with bowel function was collected from the parents and defined as the number of which were satisfied with bowel function after the treatment (yes or no).
at the end of 12 weeks follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Bowel movements the frequency of bowel movements per week
Baseline
Bowel movements
at the end of 4-weeks PTNS and PFR treatment
Bowel movements
at the end of 12 weeks follow-up
Painful or hard bowel movements
Baseline
Painful or hard bowel movements
at the end of 4-weeks PTNS and PFR treatment
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Treatment group
EXPERIMENTALPTNS and PFR (twice daily)
Control group
EXPERIMENTALSham PTNS and PFR (twice daily)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old;
- Meeting the Roman IV criteria for childhood constipation;
- After one course of PEG and one course of Chinese medicine treatment, it was ineffective;
- Pelvic floor surface electromyography (EMG) and 3-D manometry of the anus revealed pelvic floor dysfunction
You may not qualify if:
- The onset of intestinal stenosis due to organic diseases (such as anal fissure, inflammation, intestinal polyps, intestinal adhesion, Crohn's disease, intestinal tuberculosis, tumor, etc.);
- constipation due to congenital diseases (such as congenital megacolon, sigmoid colon, etc.);
- Caused by metabolic endocrine diseases, neurological diseases and mental diseases;
- Those caused by systemic organic diseases;
- Patients diagnosed as outlet obstructive constipation and mixed functional constipation;
- Children with severe systemic diseases;
- Children with positive occult blood in stool routine examination;
- Children who refused to participate in PTNS combined with PFR.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shengjing Hospital
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China
Related Publications (2)
Zar-Kessler C, Kuo B, Cole E, Benedix A, Belkind-Gerson J. Benefit of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in Pediatric Patients with Dyssynergic Defecation Constipation. Dig Dis. 2019;37(6):478-485. doi: 10.1159/000500121. Epub 2019 May 16.
PMID: 31096249BACKGROUNDScaldazza CV, Morosetti C, Giampieretti R, Lorenzetti R, Baroni M. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus electrical stimulation with pelvic floor muscle training for overactive bladder syndrome in women: results of a randomized controlled study. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Jan-Feb;43(1):121-126. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0719.
PMID: 28124534RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Shucheng ZHANG
Shengjing Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
ZhengTong YU
Shengjing Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2021
First Posted
September 28, 2021
Study Start
May 8, 2019
Primary Completion
December 8, 2021
Study Completion
December 8, 2021
Last Updated
November 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11