Manual Fascial Manipulation in Pregnant Women
The Influence of Manual Fascial Manipulation on the Function of the Pelvic Floor in Pregnant Women
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pregnancy and vaginal delivery are considered as the main risk factors for damage to the pelvic floor. There are various ways to measure the strength of the pelvic floor and to evaluate functional problems. Manual mobilization of the pelvic floor is a well-known treatment modality, however, ample knowledge exists on the efficacy of physiotherapy and exercise for improvement of pelvic floor function and strength. The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of pelvic floor fascial mobilization (PFFM) technique on the function and strength of the pelvic floor muscles as well as parameters presumed to be influenced by the strength of the pelvic floor in pregnant women.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedJune 9, 2020
June 1, 2020
1.9 years
January 24, 2017
June 7, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Contraction strength
Contraction strength assessed by Oxford grading scale
Change of contraction strength is assessed - from baseline to 2 weeks after last treatment ( up to maximum of 1 month )
Contraction pressure
Contraction pressure measured by using Peritron perineometer
Change of contraction pressure is assessed - from baseline to 2 weeks after last treatment ( up to maximum of 1 month )
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Symptoms associated with pelvic dysfunction
Change of pelvic dysfunction is assessed - from baseline to 2 weeks after last treatment ( up to maximum of 1 month )
FEV1
Change of FEV1 is assessed - from baseline to 2 weeks after last treatment ( up to maximum of 1 month )
Voice Handicap Index - 10 among Hebrew speakers (VHI-10-HEB) questionaire
Change of VHI-10-HEB is assessed - from baseline to 2 weeks after last treatment ( up to maximum of 1 month )
Study Arms (2)
Study group - Treatment with PFFM
EXPERIMENTALManual treatment for the pelvic floor will be provided in two sessions two weeks apart as long as guidance towards exercise for strengthening of the pelvic floor
Control group -
NO INTERVENTIONGuidance towards exercise for strengthening of the pelvic floor with no other interventional treatment.
Interventions
The manual manipulation of the pelvic floor involves intra vaginal superficial as well as pelvic skin area pressure points.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 20-45 years old
- Gestational age 24-30 weeks gestation
- Singleton pregnancy
- Expected second-4ourth delivery
You may not qualify if:
- First delivery
- Gestational age at more than 30 weeks gestation at enrollment
- Premature contractions
- Cervical insufficiency
- Placenta previa
- Placenta accrete
- Multifetal pregnancy
- Maternal chronic illness including connective tissue disease, neurological illness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, Israel
Related Publications (8)
Batista EM, Conde DM, Do Amaral WN, Martinez EZ. Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength between women undergoing vaginal delivery, cesarean section, and nulliparae using a perineometer and digital palpation. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011 Nov;27(11):910-4. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2011.569603. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
PMID: 21500994BACKGROUNDHallock JL, Handa VL. The Epidemiology of Pelvic Floor Disorders and Childbirth: An Update. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016 Mar;43(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008.
PMID: 26880504BACKGROUNDNavot S, Kalichman L. Hip and groin pain in a cyclist resolved after performing a pelvic floor fascial mobilization. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016 Jul;20(3):604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
PMID: 27634085BACKGROUNDOkido MM, Valeri FL, Martins WP, Ferreira CH, Duarte G, Cavalli RC. Assessment of foetal wellbeing in pregnant women subjected to pelvic floor muscle training: a controlled randomised study. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Oct;26(10):1475-81. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2719-4. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
PMID: 26294205BACKGROUNDPetricelli CD, Resende AP, Elito Junior J, Araujo Junior E, Alexandre SM, Zanetti MR, Nakamura MU. Distensibility and strength of the pelvic floor muscles of women in the third trimester of pregnancy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:437867. doi: 10.1155/2014/437867. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
PMID: 24877094BACKGROUNDTalasz H, Kofler M, Kalchschmid E, Pretterklieber M, Lechleitner M. Breathing with the pelvic floor? Correlation of pelvic floor muscle function and expiratory flows in healthy young nulliparous women. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Apr;21(4):475-81. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1060-1. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
PMID: 19997721BACKGROUNDvan Veelen GA, Schweitzer KJ, van der Vaart CH. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: changes in anatomy during and after first pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;44(4):476-80. doi: 10.1002/uog.13301.
PMID: 24436146BACKGROUNDWoodley SJ, Lawrenson P, Boyle R, Cody JD, Morkved S, Kernohan A, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 6;5(5):CD007471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007471.pub4.
PMID: 32378735DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2017
First Posted
February 2, 2017
Study Start
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
June 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share