Meniscal Repair: A Randomized Prospective Trial of FAST-FIX vs. Meniscal Suturing
2 other identifiers
interventional
132
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Meniscal repair resulting in meniscal preservation is the most desirable treatment of a torn meniscus and is one of the most commonly performed arthroscopic procedures. The inside-out meniscal suturing technique allows precise placement of sutures under direct visualization and studies have reported excellent healing rates and low re-tear rates. However, complications associated with the use of the inside-out technique (injury to the knee's neurovascular structures and infection) and the fact that it is a time consuming procedure have generated the development of alternative methods and devices. The FasT-Fix is reported to be quicker and safer. It is applicable to tears in most locations and requires no additional incisions or portals. Even though this and many similar devices are widely used with reported clinical healing rates of 75 -92% and relatively minor complications, few prospective, randomized clinical trials evaluating and comparing different techniques have been carried out. Patient outcome studies are necessary to evaluate which technique ultimately results in the most effective repair and the least patient disability following surgery. We hypothesize that an inside-out suturing technique will have a higher complication rate but a significantly lower failure rate than the FasT-Fix Menisical Repair System
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2005
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2009
CompletedNovember 30, 2015
November 1, 2015
4 years
January 31, 2006
November 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of life at 2 years as measured by The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET)
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Side-to-side difference in knee joint range of motion
2 years
Other physical symptoms such as joint line pain/tenderness, knee effusion
2 years
Re-tear rate (as confirmed by MRI or arthroscopy), Functional outcome scores
2 years
Surgical time
day 0
Complication rate
2 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
FAST FIX
EXPERIMENTALInetrvention is Fast Fix repair of meniscal tear
Meniscal suturing
EXPERIMENTALIntervention is Standard suturing of meniscal tear
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \*\* Canadians Only can be recruited for this trial
- History indicative of meniscal pathology (i.e. pain, locking, clicking or giving way of the knee) +/- ACL insufficiency
- On physical exam, evidence of a meniscal tear (i.e. a locked joint, joint line tenderness and pain on meniscal compression +/- evidence of an ACL tear
- Vertical tears in the peripheral 0-5mm of the meniscus that are reducible
You may not qualify if:
- Intraarticular/Extraarticular knee infection
- Metabolic bone, collagen, crystalline joint or neoplastic disease
- Previous meniscal repair
- Meniscal tears that are in the avascular zone
- Stable meniscal tears, i.e. tears \<10mm and displaced \< 3mm, partial tears
- Radial, horizontal or flap tears
- Unwillingness to comply with the rehabilitation protocol or to be followed for 2 years
- Inability or unwillingness of subject /legal guardian to give written informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Cliniclead
- Smith & Nephew, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kevin Willits, MD
The University of Western Ontario
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2006
First Posted
February 1, 2006
Study Start
June 1, 2005
Primary Completion
June 1, 2009
Study Completion
June 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 30, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11