Mirror Therapy and CIMT in Chronic Stroke Patients
Effects of Mirror Therapy and Constrained Induced Movement Therapy in Upper Limb Rehabilitation Among Chronic Stroke Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this research is to find and compare the effect of mirror therapy and constrained induced movement therapy in upper limb rehabilitation among chronic stroke patient .Study conducted in THQ Hospital Depalpur. The sample size was 36. Patients were divided into two groups. In group-A patients were treated with mirror therapy and in group-B patients were treated with constrained induced movement therapy. Both therapy sessions lasting for 60 minutes for total 1 hour in a day, 5 times a week and for consecutive 3 weeks in a month. Sessions consist of total 20 min of passive mobilization to both groups, 30 min session for MMT to 1 group, 30 min session to CIMT (task specific) to another group, and 10 minutes standard ADL activities. The outcome was calculated with FMA-UE and modified Ashworth scale. Data was analyzed by SPSS 22.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2021
CompletedSeptember 22, 2021
September 1, 2021
8 months
August 23, 2021
September 13, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fugyl Myer assessment tool for upper extremity
The Fugyl Myer assessment (FMA) motor assessments for the upper (maximum score 66 points) and lower extremity (maximum score 34 points) are recommended as core measures to be used in every stroke recovery and rehabilitation trial. Change from baseline FMA at 3 weeks
3 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Mirror therapy
EXPERIMENTALSession consist of total 1hour,20 min of passive mobilization, 30 minutes for Movement mirror therapy,10 minutes standard ADL activities 5 times a week and for consecutive 3 weeks in a month.
Constrained induced movement therapy (CIMT)
EXPERIMENTALSession consist of total 1hour ,20 min of passive mobilization, 30 min session to CIMT and 10 minutes standard ADL activities 5 times a week and for consecutive 3 weeks in a month.
Interventions
Session consist of total 1hour,20 min of passive mobilization, 30 minutes for Movement mirror therapy,10 minutes standard ADL activities 5 times a week and for consecutive 3 weeks in a month.
Session consist of total 1hour ,20 min of passive mobilization, 30 min session to CIMT and 10 minutes standard ADL activities 5 times a week and for consecutive 3 weeks in a month.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ranges between 40-65 years.
- Chronic stroke (ischemic/hemorrhagic) more than 6 months.
- Ability to participate in a therapy session lasting at least 3 minutes.
- Chronic stroke with mild spasticity (score of 2 or less on Modified Ashworth Scale).
- Good cognitive function (score of 20 or more in Mini Mental state Examination).
- Range of motion of about 10º or 20º (measured with Goniometer)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with orthopedic conditions like fractures, etc.
- Subjects presenting with unable to follow visual command.
- Language deficits that could prevent them from following instructions.
- Age group below 45 years and more than 65 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Riphah International University
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Related Publications (9)
Park JY, Chang M, Kim KM, Kim HJ. The effect of mirror therapy on upper-extremity function and activities of daily living in stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jun;27(6):1681-3. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1681. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
PMID: 26180297BACKGROUNDBroderick P, Horgan F, Blake C, Ehrensberger M, Simpson D, Monaghan K. Mirror therapy and treadmill training for patients with chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019 Apr;26(3):163-172. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1556504. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
PMID: 30580672BACKGROUNDAckerley SJ, Byblow WD, Barber PA, MacDonald H, McIntyre-Robinson A, Stinear CM. Primed Physical Therapy Enhances Recovery of Upper Limb Function in Chronic Stroke Patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 May;30(4):339-48. doi: 10.1177/1545968315595285. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
PMID: 26180053BACKGROUNDTeasell R, Mehta S, Pereira S, McIntyre A, Janzen S, Allen L, Lobo L, Viana R. Time to rethink long-term rehabilitation management of stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;19(6):457-62. doi: 10.1310/tsr1906-457.
PMID: 23192711BACKGROUNDLee JS, Lee HG. Effects of sling exercise therapy on trunk muscle activation and balance in chronic hemiplegic patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 May;26(5):655-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.655. Epub 2014 May 29.
PMID: 24926126BACKGROUNDKwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Feb;14(2):224-34. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70160-7.
PMID: 25772900BACKGROUNDMichielsen ME, Selles RW, van der Geest JN, Eckhardt M, Yavuzer G, Stam HJ, Smits M, Ribbers GM, Bussmann JB. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(3):223-33. doi: 10.1177/1545968310385127. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
PMID: 21051765BACKGROUNDNasb M, Li Z, S A Youssef A, Dayoub L, Chen H. Comparison of the effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy and intensive conventional therapy with a botulinum-a toxin injection on upper limb motor function recovery in patients with stroke. Libyan J Med. 2019 Dec;14(1):1609304. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2019.1609304.
PMID: 31032717BACKGROUNDStark A, Farber C, Tetzlaff B, Scherer M, Barzel A. Stroke patients' and non-professional coaches' experiences with home-based constraint-induced movement therapy: a qualitative study. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Sep;33(9):1527-1539. doi: 10.1177/0269215519848813. Epub 2019 May 20.
PMID: 31104476BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tehreem Mukhtar, MS
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2021
First Posted
September 22, 2021
Study Start
June 15, 2019
Primary Completion
February 20, 2020
Study Completion
April 30, 2020
Last Updated
September 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share