Quality of Recovery Under Low or Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure
Quality of Recovery After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade Using Low Pressure or Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum seems to be able to reduce complications such as postoperative pain. However, the quality of evidence for most studies evaluating this relationship is considered low. The absence of concealment of pneumoperitoneum pressure and the lack of description of neuromuscular blockade characteristics are the main causes of bias. The purpose of this study will be to evaluate by means of a prospective, randomized and double-blinded trial, the quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under moderate neuromuscular blockade, using low pneumoperitoneum pressure or "standard" pressure. Eighty patients submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and randomly distributed in two groups will be included: low pneumoperitoneum pressure (10 mmHg) or "standard" pressure (14 mmHg). The value of abdominal pressure will be kept hidden for all participants, except for the nurse responsible for the operating room. Moderate neuromuscular blockade will be maintained according to Train-of-four count (TOFc) = 3 for all cases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Oct 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2022
CompletedSeptember 20, 2021
September 1, 2021
3 months
September 2, 2021
September 13, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of recovery
The quality of recovery will be assessed using the Qualtity of Recovery 15 questionnaire. Total scores range from 0 to 150. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
From randomization up to 15 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pain
From the PACU arriving up to 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Group pneumoperitoneum pressure 10
ACTIVE COMPARATORPneumoperitoneum pressure at 10 mmHg
Group neumoperitoneum pressure 14
PLACEBO COMPARATORPneumoperitoneum pressure at 10 mmHg
Interventions
The abdomen will be inflated with carbon dioxide to maintain the intra-abdominal pressure at 10 mmHg (group 10)
The abdomen will be inflated with carbon dioxide to maintain the intra-abdominal pressure at 14 mmHg (group 14).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Physical status I and II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
- Undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
You may not qualify if:
- refuse to participate
- Present inability to communicate due to altered level of consciousness or due to the presence of neurological or psychiatric illness
- Present contraindication to the use of any of the drugs employed in the study
- Present history of alcohol or drug addiction
- Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35
- Presence of chronic pain or use of opioids.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Eduardo T Moro
Araçoiaba da Serra, São Paulo, 18190-000, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eduardo Moro
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde PUCSP
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients will be randomized according to the sequence of random numbers generated by a computer using a specific program (www.random.org). For each patient, an opaque envelope containing the group to which the patient will be allocated will be prepared, sealed, and numbered sequentially.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2021
First Posted
September 10, 2021
Study Start
October 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 5, 2022
Study Completion
January 15, 2022
Last Updated
September 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- When summary data are published
- Access Criteria
- The access will be related to the journal (open access or not)
Results will be submitted to publication