Low Doses of Ketamine and Postoperative Quality of Recovery
Effects of Low Doses of Ketamine on Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Total Intravenous Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
135
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There are evidences that intraoperative administration of low doses of ketamine may contribute to control the postoperative pain by acting on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) channel, reducing the effects related to the tolerance and hyperalgesia induced by opioids. This study aims to evaluate the effects of administration of this agent not only as an analgesic but also its role in the quality of recovery from anesthesia, which includes observation of emotional, psychological and physical aspects. Patients who were scheduled to undergo total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be enrolled in this clinical study. After induction of anesthesia, patients will receive one of three solutions according to the randomly selected group: ketamine 0,2 mg/kg; ketamine 0,4 mg/kg or saline. In the recovery room and on the ward, data related to the presence of pain, analgesic consumption, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, dizziness or hallucinations will be recorded. The next day, the quality of recovery will be evaluated by application of the questionnaire QoR40 (Quality of Recovery Questionnaire-40).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 postoperative-pain
Started Sep 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 6, 2017
CompletedMarch 6, 2017
January 1, 2017
6 months
October 2, 2015
September 28, 2016
January 12, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of Postoperative Recovery Assessed by QoR-40 Questionnaire 24 Hours After Surgery
Quality of postoperative functional recovery assessed by the questionnaire QoR40 The quality of postoperative functional recovery was assessed by the QoR-40 questionnaire, which assesses five dimensions of recovery (physical comfort - 12 items; emotional state - 7 items; physical independence - 5 items; physiological support - 7 items; and pain - 7 items). Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale: none of the time, some of the time, usually, most of the time, and all the time. The total score on the QoR-40 ranges from 40 (poorest quality of recovery) to 200 (best quality of recovery). The QoR-40 was administered by a blind investigator 24 hours after surgery.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Length of PACU Stay
During the stay at postanesthesia recovery room (about 90 to 120 minutes)
Occurrence of Postoperative, Nausea and Vomiting
24 hours
Occurrence of Pain at PACU Using a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale
90 minutes postanesthesia at recovery room
Morphine Consumption (mg) at PACU
During the stay at postanesthesia recovery room (about 90 to 120 minutes)
The Severity of Postoperative Pain
24 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Saline group
PLACEBO COMPARATORNormal saline 0.9% (5 mL)
Ketamine 0.2
EXPERIMENTALketamine 0.2 mg/kg (5 mL)
Ketamine 0.4
EXPERIMENTALketamine 0.4 mg/kg (5 mL)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II
- Patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to participate in the study
- Patients who are not able to communicate due to alterations in the level of consciousness, or neurologic, or psychiatric disease
- Contraindication of any of the drugs used in the study
- Patients who are superobese (BMI\>40)
- History of alcohol or drug dependence
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Santa Lucinda Hospital
Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18030-230, Brazil
Related Publications (5)
Xie H, Wang X, Liu G, Wang G. Analgesic effects and pharmacokinetics of a low dose of ketamine preoperatively administered epidurally or intravenously. Clin J Pain. 2003 Sep-Oct;19(5):317-22. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200309000-00006.
PMID: 12966258BACKGROUNDMyles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
PMID: 10740540BACKGROUNDWu L, Huang X, Sun L. The efficacy of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists on improving the postoperative pain intensity and satisfaction after remifentanil-based anesthesia in adults: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Jun;27(4):311-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
PMID: 25824051BACKGROUNDPfenninger EG, Durieux ME, Himmelseher S. Cognitive impairment after small-dose ketamine isomers in comparison to equianalgesic racemic ketamine in human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2002 Feb;96(2):357-66. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200202000-00022.
PMID: 11818769BACKGROUNDKissin I, Bright CA, Bradley EL Jr. The effect of ketamine on opioid-induced acute tolerance: can it explain reduction of opioid consumption with ketamine-opioid analgesic combinations? Anesth Analg. 2000 Dec;91(6):1483-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200012000-00035.
PMID: 11094005BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Eduardo Toshiyuki Moro
- Organization
- Pontificia UCSP
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eduardo T Moro, PhD
School of Medical and Health Sciences, Pontificial Catholic University of São Paulo - PUCSP
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2015
First Posted
October 8, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 6, 2017
Results First Posted
March 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01