B-lines-guided Heart Failure Management in Heart Failure Patients
IMP-OUTCOME
Impact of B-lines-guided Intensive Heart Failure Management on Outcome of Discharged Heart Failure Patients With Residual B-lines
1 other identifier
observational
320
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background:About 50% of subclinical heart failure (Sub-HF) patients might have residual lung ultrasound B-lines (LUS-BL). Sub-HF is insensitive to widely used imaging examinations, like x-ray or echocardiography, but lung ultrasound (LUS) can sufficiently detect pulmonary congestion in Sub-HF patients. Previous studies showed that residual LUS-BL is associated worse clinical outcome among patients with chronic heart failure. In this trial, we sought to evaluate the impact of LUS-BL guided intensive HF management post discharge in patients with residual LUS-BL on outcome up to 1 year after discharge. Aim: IMP-OUTCOME is a prospective, single-center, observational cohort study, which is designed to investigate whether LUS-BL-guided intensive HF management post discharge might improve the outcome of HF patients with residual B-lines at discharge up to 1 year after discharge. Methods and results: After receiving the standardized treatment of HF according to current guidelines, 320 HF patients with ≥ 3 B-lines (LUS-BL, assessed within 48 hours before discharge) will be divided into the conventional HF management group and the LUS-BL-guided intensive HF management group at 1:1 ratio. LUS-BL-guided intensive HF management group will receive optimized HF medication according to current guidelines and medication will be adjusted according the status of LUS-BL in addition to symptom and physical examination results during the follow-up at 2-month interval. Patient-related clinical data including sex, age, blood chemistry, imaging examination, drug utilization, and so on will be obtained and analyzed. Following discharge from the hospital, patients in the conventional HF management group will receive optimized HF medication according to current guidelines and medication will be adjusted without knowing the status of LU-BL during the follow-up at 2-month interval. LUS-BL will be assessed at 2-month interval post discharge in both groups, results will be transferred to HF nurses, who will decide to present the LUS-BL results to managing cardiologist or envelope the LUS-BL results till study end according to group assignment. Echocardiography examination will be performed at 12 months for all patients and EF, E/e', LA size and systolic pulmonary artery pressure will be assessed. The primary endpoint is the composite of re-hospitalization for worsening HF and all-cause death during follow-up. Secondary endpoints include the change in the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and NT-pro BNP, arrythmia and 6-minutes walk distance at each follow up, EF and B-lines changes at final follow up. Safety profile will be noted and analyzed. Primary results will be available by early 2024. Conclusion: This trial will clarify the impact of LUS-BL guided intensive HF management on outcome for discharged patients with residual B-lines up to 1 year after discharge in the era of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2022
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 25, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 25, 2024
CompletedJune 28, 2024
June 1, 2024
1.2 years
August 25, 2021
June 27, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome consisted of readmission for worsening heart failure, or death during follow-up.
follow-up by clinical visit
The patients will be followed up for 1 year after they were discharged from the hospital.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) score
Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months post discharge
Change in NT-proBNP
Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months post discharge
Change in 6-minute walk distance values (6MWD)
Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months post discharge
Change in arrythmia
Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months post discharge
Other Outcomes (1)
Safety outcome
Baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months post discharge
Study Arms (2)
Conventional heart failure management group
Patients with ≥ 3 B-lines will be divided into the conventional heart failure management group and the LUS-BL-guided intensive heart failure management group at 1:1 ratio. Patients in the conventional heart failure management group will receive conventional guideline recommended HF therapy post discharge and be followed up at 2-month interval post discharge by clinical visit. LUS-BL will be assessed at 2-month interval post discharge also in this group, but results will be enveloped.
LU-BL guided intensive heart failure management group
The group with ≥ 3 B-lines will be divided into the conventional heart failure management group and the LUS-BL-guided intensive heart failure management group at 1:1 ratio. Patients in the LUS-BL-guided intensive heart failure management group will receive optimized HF medication and medication will be adjusted according the status of LUS-BL during the follow-up at 2-month interval.
Interventions
drug adjustment based on lung ultrasound results
Eligibility Criteria
The patient volunteered for the trial.
You may qualify if:
- Hospitalized heart failure patients with objective heart failure evidence during or before hospitalization.
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II, III, or IV.
- Patients with NT-proBNP level of at least 600pg/meal (or ≥400 pg/meal if they had been hospitalized for heart failure within the previous 12 months). Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter patients with NT-proBNP level of at least 900 pg/ml, regardless of their history of HF hospitalization.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Xiangtan Central Hospital
Xiangtan, Hunan, 411100, China
Related Publications (2)
Platz E, Lewis EF, Uno H, Peck J, Pivetta E, Merz AA, Hempel D, Wilson C, Frasure SE, Jhund PS, Cheng S, Solomon SD. Detection and prognostic value of pulmonary congestion by lung ultrasound in ambulatory heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2016 Apr 14;37(15):1244-51. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv745. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
PMID: 26819225RESULTZhu Y, Li N, Wu M, Peng Z, Huang H, Zhao W, Yi L, Liao M, Liu Z, Peng Y, Zhou Y, Lu J, Li G, Zeng J. Impact of B-lines-guided intensive heart failure management on outcome of discharged heart failure patients with residual B-lines. ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;9(4):2713-2718. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13988. Epub 2022 May 20.
PMID: 35595501DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dean, Xiangtan Central Hospital ,Director of cardiovascular clinic, Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2021
First Posted
September 5, 2021
Study Start
March 25, 2022
Primary Completion
May 25, 2023
Study Completion
August 25, 2024
Last Updated
June 28, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share