NCT05033457

Brief Summary

OBJECTIVE Both unilateral biportal endoscopy technique(UBE) and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy(PETD) are minimally invasive and effective surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis.The object of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between UBE and PETD. METHODS In the period from July 2020 to December 2020, using UBE or PETD to treat lumbar canal stenosis.Patients were classified into two groups based on the surgery they had undergone. Preoperative and postoperative MR image was used to evaluate the removal rate of lumbar disc herniated material by two surgical methods. The two surgical methods are also compared and evaluated in terms of operation time, incision size, hospitalization time, etc.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
20mo left

Started Jan 2018

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress83%
Jan 2018Jan 2028

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2018

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 9, 2021

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 2, 2021

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2028

Last Updated

September 2, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

10 years

First QC Date

August 9, 2021

Last Update Submit

August 27, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (14)

  • Cross-sectional area of the preoperative lumbar intervertebral disc

    The preoperative axial T2-weighted MRI slices of the patient can be used to measure the cross-sectional area of the intervertebral disc of the diseased segment.

    preoperative

  • Cross-sectional area of the preoperative spinal canal

    The preoperative axial T2-weighted MRI slices of the patient can be used to measure the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal of the diseased segment.

    preoperative

  • Cross-sectional area of the postoperative lumbar intervertebral disc

    The postoperative axial T2-weighted MRI slices of the patient can be used to measure the cross-sectional area of the intervertebral disc of the diseased segment.

    3 months after surgery

  • preoperative ODI

    According to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), evaluate the preoperative ODI of participants.

    preoperative

  • ODI on 3 months after operation

    According to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), evaluate the ODI of participants on 3 months after operation.

    3 months after surgery

  • ODI at the final follow-up

    According to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), evaluate the ODI of participants at the final follow-up.

    Final follow-up

  • preoperative VAS back pain score

    According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the preoperative VAS back pain score of participants.

    preoperative

  • preoperative VAS leg pain score

    According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the preoperative VAS leg pain score of participants.

    preoperative

  • VAS back pain score on postoperative day 1

    According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS back pain score of participants on postoperative day 1.

    1 day after operation

  • VAS leg pain score on postoperative day 1

    According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS leg pain score of participants on postoperative day 1.

    1 day after operation

  • VAS back pain score on 3 months after operation

    According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS back pain score of participants on 3 months after operation.

    3 months after operation

  • VAS leg pain score on 3 months after operation

    According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS leg pain score of participants on 3 months after operation.

    3 months after operation

  • VAS back pain score at the final follow-up

    According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS back pain score of participants at the final follow-up.

    Final follow-up

  • VAS leg pain score at the final follow-up

    According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS leg pain score of participants at the final follow-up.

    Final follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • operation time

    intraoperative

  • incision size

    intraoperative

Study Arms (2)

unilateral biportal endoscopy technique group

Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation with unilateral biportal endoscopy technique in unilateral biportal endoscopy technique group

Procedure: unilateral biportal endoscopy technique or percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy

percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy group

Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy group

Procedure: unilateral biportal endoscopy technique or percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy

Interventions

Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation with unilateral biportal endoscopy technique in unilateral biportal endoscopy technique group.Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy group.

percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy groupunilateral biportal endoscopy technique group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, with low back pain and neurological urgency.The patient cannot relieve symptoms after 3 months or more of conservative treatment.

You may qualify if:

  • \- Single-segment lumbar disc herniation/lumbar spinal stenosis

You may not qualify if:

  • Multi-segment lumbar disc herniation / lumbar spinal stenosis、Have received surgery、Hypertension、Diabetes
  • Single-segment lumbar disc herniation Symptoms of nerve compression
  • foraminal and extraforaminal disc herniation multilevel disc herniation, spinal stenosis spondylolisthesis scoliosis prior lumbar surgery spinal infection spinal tumor a history of hip or knee arthritis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Shanxi Medical University

Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030000, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intervertebral Disc Displacement

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Jingpeng Wei

    Shanxi Medical University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2021

First Posted

September 2, 2021

Study Start

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Last Updated

September 2, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-01

Locations