Comparative Study Between UBE and PETD for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis
Comparative Study Between Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Technique and Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
OBJECTIVE Both unilateral biportal endoscopy technique(UBE) and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy(PETD) are minimally invasive and effective surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis.The object of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between UBE and PETD. METHODS In the period from July 2020 to December 2020, using UBE or PETD to treat lumbar canal stenosis.Patients were classified into two groups based on the surgery they had undergone. Preoperative and postoperative MR image was used to evaluate the removal rate of lumbar disc herniated material by two surgical methods. The two surgical methods are also compared and evaluated in terms of operation time, incision size, hospitalization time, etc.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2028
September 2, 2021
January 1, 2021
10 years
August 9, 2021
August 27, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Cross-sectional area of the preoperative lumbar intervertebral disc
The preoperative axial T2-weighted MRI slices of the patient can be used to measure the cross-sectional area of the intervertebral disc of the diseased segment.
preoperative
Cross-sectional area of the preoperative spinal canal
The preoperative axial T2-weighted MRI slices of the patient can be used to measure the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal of the diseased segment.
preoperative
Cross-sectional area of the postoperative lumbar intervertebral disc
The postoperative axial T2-weighted MRI slices of the patient can be used to measure the cross-sectional area of the intervertebral disc of the diseased segment.
3 months after surgery
preoperative ODI
According to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), evaluate the preoperative ODI of participants.
preoperative
ODI on 3 months after operation
According to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), evaluate the ODI of participants on 3 months after operation.
3 months after surgery
ODI at the final follow-up
According to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), evaluate the ODI of participants at the final follow-up.
Final follow-up
preoperative VAS back pain score
According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the preoperative VAS back pain score of participants.
preoperative
preoperative VAS leg pain score
According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the preoperative VAS leg pain score of participants.
preoperative
VAS back pain score on postoperative day 1
According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS back pain score of participants on postoperative day 1.
1 day after operation
VAS leg pain score on postoperative day 1
According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS leg pain score of participants on postoperative day 1.
1 day after operation
VAS back pain score on 3 months after operation
According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS back pain score of participants on 3 months after operation.
3 months after operation
VAS leg pain score on 3 months after operation
According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS leg pain score of participants on 3 months after operation.
3 months after operation
VAS back pain score at the final follow-up
According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS back pain score of participants at the final follow-up.
Final follow-up
VAS leg pain score at the final follow-up
According to the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring standard, assess the VAS leg pain score of participants at the final follow-up.
Final follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (2)
operation time
intraoperative
incision size
intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
unilateral biportal endoscopy technique group
Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation with unilateral biportal endoscopy technique in unilateral biportal endoscopy technique group
percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy group
Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy group
Interventions
Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation with unilateral biportal endoscopy technique in unilateral biportal endoscopy technique group.Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy group.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, with low back pain and neurological urgency.The patient cannot relieve symptoms after 3 months or more of conservative treatment.
You may qualify if:
- \- Single-segment lumbar disc herniation/lumbar spinal stenosis
You may not qualify if:
- Multi-segment lumbar disc herniation / lumbar spinal stenosis、Have received surgery、Hypertension、Diabetes
- Single-segment lumbar disc herniation Symptoms of nerve compression
- foraminal and extraforaminal disc herniation multilevel disc herniation, spinal stenosis spondylolisthesis scoliosis prior lumbar surgery spinal infection spinal tumor a history of hip or knee arthritis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shanxi Medical University
Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jingpeng Wei
Shanxi Medical University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2021
First Posted
September 2, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Last Updated
September 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01