Wallis Interspinous Dynamic Stability System for Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Prospective Study
Effectiveness of Wallis Interspinous Dynamic Stability System for Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Prospective Randomised Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Lumbar disc herniation is usually treated by discectomy alone. Nonfusion system such as Wallis interspinous implants have also been successfully used in disc degenerative diseases. However, the superiority of a discectomy with Wallis in comparison to a discectomy alone for primary lumbar disc herniation has yet to be determined.The aim of our study is to investigate whether lumbar discectomy combined with the Wallis device provides better radiographic and clinical short-term outcome than posterior lumbar discectomy alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jul 2008
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2013
CompletedApril 4, 2013
March 1, 2013
4.3 years
March 25, 2013
March 31, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2 days before intervention
baseline VAS
2 days before intervention
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 week after intervention
1 week after intervention
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 12 months after intervention
12 months after intervention
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 24 months after intervention
24 months after intervention
Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 2 days before intervention
baseline JOA
2 days before intervention
Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 1 week after intervention
1 week after intervention
Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 12 months after intervention
12 months after intervention
Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 24 months after intervention
24 months after intervention
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 2 days before intervention
baseline ODI
2 days before intervention
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 week after intervention
1 week after intervention
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months after intervention
12 months after intervention
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 24 months after intervention
24 months after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Intervertebral disc height of the operated segments
2 days before intervention and 1 week, 12 months and 24 months after intervention
Range of motion of the operated segments
2 days before intervention, 12 months and 24 months after intervention
Complications
1 week, 12 months and 24 months after intervention
Study Arms (2)
control group: Lumbar discectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORLumbar discectomy alone
Treatment group: lumbar discectomy + Wallis implant
EXPERIMENTALlumbar discectomy combined with Wallis interspinous dynamic stability system
Interventions
All the patients were in prone positions on the operation table and received general anesthesia. A midline incision was made and paravertebral muscles were dissected unilaterally. Disc excision and nerve root decompression were initially accomplished through a unilateral transflaval approach. Then the wound was closed with a suction drain.
The Wallis interspinous implant is placed after a lumbar discectomy. Interspinal ligaments of operated segment were removed and supraspinal ligament were retained. And then the proper size of Wallis implant was mounted underneath the supraspinous ligament and secured to the spine with the attached Dacron bands,above and below the corresponding spinous processes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old;
- complaining low back pain or radioactive melosalgia;
- preoperative image examination showing disc herniation or spinal stenosis caused by herniation of responsible level;
- no improvement in symptoms after 6-10 weeks of non-surgical treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- previous operations;
- congenital spinal deformity;
- lumbar fracture;
- infection;
- autoimmune diseases;
- serious osteoporosis;
- morbidly obese;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Guangdong Gerneral Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Orthopaedic Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2013
First Posted
April 4, 2013
Study Start
July 1, 2008
Primary Completion
October 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 4, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-03