NCT05032222

Brief Summary

Hypospadias is a common anomaly of the male genitalia affecting 0.4-8.2 of 1000 live male babies and varies considerably in severity. The position of the urethral meatus can be classified as anterior or distal (glandular, coronal, or subcoronal; 60-65% of cases), middle (midpenile; 20-30% of cases), or posterior or proximal (posterior penile, penoscrotal, scrotal, or perineal; 10-15% of cases). The subcoronal position is the most common. Most cases are mild and surgical correction is undertaken mostly for cosmetic reasons at the request of the parents or on advice of the pediatrician or surgeon. Functional success of hypospadias repair depends on the creation of a uniform and adequate caliber urethra up to the meatus. Accordingly, meatal stenosis and urethral stricture are the important complications of surgery, others include urethrocutaneous fistula, diverticula, skin flap necrosis and persistent chordee. Although functional assessment of the repair is possible by observation of the urinary stream and voiding cystourethrography, uroflowmetry is considered to be a more objective tool, especially for the detection of a subclinical urethral stricture. Reports of the results of hypospadias surgery commonly focus on the cosmetic results and incidence of obvious complications, as urethrocutaneous fistulas, and symptomatic urethral Strictures. Few have emphasized the role of uroflowmetry in the postoperative evaluation of children with hypospadias to detect asymptomatic strictures and, despite the simplicity and non-invasive nature of this test, it has not become standard or widely accepted. We evaluate AUUH experience by use of 'hypospadias objective scoring evaluation' HOSE and uroflowmetry after hypospadias repair. The HOSE is a validated scoring system that incorporates the evaluation of meatal location and shape, urinary stream, straightness of erection, presence and complexity of urethral fistula. The minimum total score is 5, and the maximum total score is 16. The point score is graded as either acceptable or not.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
105

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2021

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 2, 2021

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 27, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

August 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 20, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of patients show Change of the maximum flow rate, average flow rate (Qav), total voided volume, PMR and voiding time from normal values.

    Number of patients show Change of the maximum flow rate, average flow rate (Qav), total voided volume, PMR and voiding time from normal values.

    Within 5 years post operative

  • Number of patients in each Type of the curve of the uroflowmetry.

    Number of patients in each Type of the curve of the uroflowmetry.

    Within 5 years postoperative

  • Finding correlation between the results of uroflowmetry and HOSE score.

    Finding correlation between the results of uroflowmetry and HOSE score.

    Within 5 years postoperative

Interventions

Diagnostic test

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Months - 18 Years
Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All cases that fulfil the selection criteria that will be followed up in the department of Assiut university hospital (non probability sample size) with Confidence Level 90 % , Population Size 10000 , Margin of Error 8 % with expected size of 105 patients starting from 01/04/2021 to 1/04/2022.

You may qualify if:

  • More than six months after last hypospadias repair.
  • Toilet trained children.
  • Patients less than 18 years old.
  • Successful repair of hypospadias with HOSE score more than 10 decided by one of the experts in pediatric urology.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient not welling to participate in our study.
  • Within six months of last hypospadias repair.
  • Patient had urethral intervention within 3 months.
  • Children with any associated neurological or urological abnormality related to the bladder, which could potentially affect flow pattern.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assiut university hospital

Asyut, 11754, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (12)

  • Olsen LH, Grothe I, Rawashdeh YF, Jorgensen TM. Urinary flow patterns in infants with distal hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Aug;7(4):428-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.05.013. Epub 2010 Jul 2.

    PMID: 20598640BACKGROUND
  • Page RE, Akin Y. Assessment of urine flow in hypospadias. Br J Plast Surg. 1978 Oct;31(4):313-6. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(78)90117-0. No abstract available.

    PMID: 152135BACKGROUND
  • Toguri AG, Uchida T, Bee DE. Pediatric uroflow rate nomograms. J Urol. 1982 Apr;127(4):727-31. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54018-5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 7069841BACKGROUND
  • Gonzalez R, Ludwikowski BM. Importance of urinary flow studies after hypospadias repair: a systematic review. Int J Urol. 2011 Nov;18(11):757-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02839.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.

    PMID: 21883491BACKGROUND
  • Kaya C, Kucuk E, Ilktac A, Ozturk M, Karaman MI. Value of urinary flow patterns in the follow-up of children who underwent Snodgrass operation. Urol Int. 2007;78(3):245-8. doi: 10.1159/000099346.

    PMID: 17406135BACKGROUND
  • Holmdahl G, Karstrom L, Abrahamsson K, Doroszkiewicz M, Sillen U. Hypospadias repair with tubularized incised plate. Is uroflowmetry necessary postoperatively? J Pediatr Urol. 2006 Aug;2(4):304-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.11.018. Epub 2006 Mar 30.

    PMID: 18947626BACKGROUND
  • Garignon C, Chamond C, Lefebure B, Halim Y, Mitrofanoff P, Liard A. [Uroflowmetric functional evaluation of modified Duplay procedure in hypospadias surgery]. Prog Urol. 2004 Dec;14(6):1199-202; discussion 1202. French.

    PMID: 15751419BACKGROUND
  • Jayanthi VR, McLorie GA, Khoury AE, Churchill BM. Functional characteristics of the reconstructed neourethra after island flap urethroplasty. J Urol. 1995 May;153(5):1657-9.

    PMID: 7715002BACKGROUND
  • Scarpa MG, Castagnetti M, Berrettini A, Rigamonti W, Musi L. Urinary function after Snodgrass repair of distal hypospadias: comparison with the Mathieu repair. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 May;26(5):519-22. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2569-6. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

    PMID: 20169443BACKGROUND
  • Wolffenbuttel KP, Wondergem N, Hoefnagels JJ, Dieleman GC, Pel JJ, Passchier BT, de Jong BW, van Dijk W, Kok DJ. Abnormal urine flow in boys with distal hypospadias before and after correction. J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 2):1733-6; discussion 1736-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00614-8.

    PMID: 16945635BACKGROUND
  • Tuygun C, Bakirtas H, Gucuk A, Cakici H, Imamoglu A. Uroflow findings in older boys with tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty. Urol Int. 2009;82(1):71-6. doi: 10.1159/000176029. Epub 2009 Jan 20.

    PMID: 19172101BACKGROUND
  • Eassa W, Brzezinski A, Capolicchio JP, Jednak R, El-Sherbiny M. How do asymptomatic toilet-trained children void following tubularized incised-plate hypospadias repair? Can Urol Assoc J. 2012 Aug;6(4):238-42. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.12029.

    PMID: 23093529BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypospadias

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urogenital AbnormalitiesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesPenile DiseasesGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Study Officials

  • Hisham M Hammoda, Professor

    Assiut University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Amr H Abo fadan, Lecturer

    Assiut University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Mahmoud F Ali, Lecturer

    Assiut University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Mohamad A Ezzat, Resident

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
OTHER
Target Duration
1 Year
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2021

First Posted

September 2, 2021

Study Start

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion

May 1, 2023

Study Completion

May 1, 2023

Last Updated

September 27, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Locations