NCT05026931

Brief Summary

This project will be Randomized control trial conducted to check the effects of foam rolling and stretching exercises on university sport's students so that we can have best treatment option for duration will be for 6 months, purposive sampling data will be done, subject following eligibility criteria from University of Lahore athlete students , were randomly allocated in two groups via lottery method, baseline assessment will be done, Group A participants were given baseline treatment along with foam rolling effects , Group B participants were given baseline treatment along with stretching exercises, pre or post intervention assessment will done via goniometer and Lower extremity functional scale (LESF)and three sessions per week will be given, data will be analyzed by using SPSS version 25.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 30, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 15, 2021

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

January 4, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

August 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 3, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Foam rolling Stretching exercises Calf Muscle length

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS)

    It is a questionnaire containing 20 questions about the person's ability to perform task. The LESF can be used by clinicians as a measure of patient's initial function ongoing progress and outcome, as well as to set functional goals.

    8th Week

  • . Goniometric:

    It is an instrument which measures the available range of motion at a joint. To measure lower extremity muscles range of motion i.e. quadriceps, hamstrings and calf muscle length

    8th Week

Study Arms (2)

Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

Foam Rolling

Other: Foam rolling

Group B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Stretching exercises

Other: Stretching exercises

Interventions

Group A will be treated with foam rolling effect on quadriceps, hamstring and calf muscle length. 5 min cycle ergometry, 6 min foam rolling 3 times for 30sec.For three session per week will be given atleast for 2 months.

Group A

Group B will be treated with stretching exercises effect on quadriceps, hamstring and calf muscle length. 5 min cycle ergometry, 6 min foam rolling 3 times for 30sec.For three session per week will be given atleast for 2 months.

Group B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 25 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • The age of participants between 18- 25 years.
  • Both male and female young athletes will be included.
  • Healthy participants involved

You may not qualify if:

  • A history of cardiovascular or respiratory disease.
  • Any history of fractures or surgeries in the lower extremity in the past year.
  • Any history of third-degree sprains (e.g., anterior cruciate ligament ruptures), grade II or III muscle strain.
  • Any prescribed medication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Lahore

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Cheatham SW, Stull KR. Comparison of a foam rolling session with active joint motion and without joint motion: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Jul;22(3):707-712. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

    PMID: 30100300BACKGROUND
  • Behara B, Jacobson BH. Acute Effects of Deep Tissue Foam Rolling and Dynamic Stretching on Muscular Strength, Power, and Flexibility in Division I Linemen. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Apr;31(4):888-892. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001051.

    PMID: 26121431BACKGROUND
  • Manoel ME, Harris-Love MO, Danoff JV, Miller TA. Acute effects of static, dynamic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on muscle power in women. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Sep;22(5):1528-34. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31817b0433.

    PMID: 18714235BACKGROUND
  • Su H, Chang NJ, Wu WL, Guo LY, Chu IH. Acute Effects of Foam Rolling, Static Stretching, and Dynamic Stretching During Warm-ups on Muscular Flexibility and Strength in Young Adults. J Sport Rehabil. 2017 Nov;26(6):469-477. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0102. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

    PMID: 27736289BACKGROUND
  • McMillian DJ, Moore JH, Hatler BS, Taylor DC. Dynamic vs. static-stretching warm up: the effect on power and agility performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2006 Aug;20(3):492-9. doi: 10.1519/18205.1.

    PMID: 16937960BACKGROUND
  • Winters MV, Blake CG, Trost JS, Marcello-Brinker TB, Lowe LM, Garber MB, Wainner RS. Passive versus active stretching of hip flexor muscles in subjects with limited hip extension: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2004 Sep;84(9):800-7.

    PMID: 15330693BACKGROUND
  • McHugh MP, Cosgrave CH. To stretch or not to stretch: the role of stretching in injury prevention and performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Apr;20(2):169-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01058.x. Epub 2009 Dec 18.

    PMID: 20030776BACKGROUND
  • Bandy WD, Irion JM. The effect of time on static stretch on the flexibility of the hamstring muscles. Phys Ther. 1994 Sep;74(9):845-50; discussion 850-2. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.9.845.

    PMID: 8066111BACKGROUND
  • Behm DG, Chaouachi A. A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Nov;111(11):2633-51. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-1879-2. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

    PMID: 21373870BACKGROUND
  • Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Stone MH. The Importance of Muscular Strength in Athletic Performance. Sports Med. 2016 Oct;46(10):1419-49. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0486-0.

    PMID: 26838985BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Muscle Stretching Exercises

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Exercise TherapyRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesExerciseMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Syed Shakil Ur Rehman

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2021

First Posted

August 30, 2021

Study Start

August 30, 2021

Primary Completion

December 15, 2021

Study Completion

December 30, 2021

Last Updated

January 4, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations