Cognitive Training and Social Interaction Effects on Cognitive Performance of Older Adults
Strategy Based Cognitive Training Effects on Cognitive Performance of Older Adults in a Socially Interactive Learning Group
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aging is associated with a decline in almost all aspects of cognitive functions, particularly memory. Recent research suggests that combining cognitive training with ongoing social interaction may aid in improving cognitive functioning for older adults. Furthermore, accumulative evidence suggests that strategy-based cognitive training may also improve the trainee's memory. In this study, the investigators examined the effects of a combined strategy-based cognitive training and a socially interactive learning method on cognitive performance and transfer effects in older adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 3, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2021
CompletedAugust 26, 2021
August 1, 2021
3 months
August 17, 2021
August 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Verbal Fluency Test (Chiu et al., 1997)
Participants were asked to say aloud as many words as possible belonging to a given category (animal's category and fruit and vegetables category) within a period of sixty seconds.
Change from baseline (before treatment) to immediately after treatment (12 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Wechsler Digit Span Test (Wechsler 2008)
Change from baseline (before treatment) to immediately after treatment (12 weeks)
Words Recall Test (Fairchild et al., 2013)
Change from baseline (before treatment) to immediately after treatment (12 weeks)
Corsi Block-Tapping Test (Corsi 1972)
Change from baseline (before treatment) to immediately after treatment (12 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
strategy-based cognitive training + social interaction
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group received twelve 60 minutes sessions of strategy-based cognitive training. (i.e., training in mnemonic memory strategies). We chose to train multiple strategies instead of a single one in effort to reach larger training gains. each session began with engaging conversations between the researcher and participants. After each practice trial, participants were encouraged to share their ideas/stories/associations or visual images (mnemonic uses) in turn. All other participants were allowed to give feedback relating to what can be learned from each mnemonic use or give their own ideas on how they think it can be improved.
social interaction
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe social interaction control group received the same number of group meetings but without the strategy training. Meetings content consisted of providing tools for making social connections, providing tools for interpersonal communication and raising the participant's sense of personal well-being through group contact.
Interventions
In the first six sessions, participants in the experimental group learned and practiced six different mnemonic strategies: Story-Formation strategy, Face-Name strategy, Peg-Word strategy, Chunking strategy, Key-Word strategy and the Method of Loci. In the following six sessions, in order to assimilate the strategies they learned, participants practiced the same tasks.
In the control group, each session also began with a conversation between the participants. The sessions then dealt with the content of interpersonal communication and the acquisition of tools for creating interpersonal relationships. Participants were asked to share the way they used the tools they acquired between sessions and received feedback from the other participants
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy participants who are active in a designated group in the community.
You may not qualify if:
- Any diagnosis of cognitive decline.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bar Ilan University
Ramat Gan, 5290002, Israel
Related Publications (18)
Choi M. Association between social participation and cognitive function among community-dwelling older adults living alone: Analysis of a nationally representative survey. Int J Nurs Pract. 2020 Aug;26(4):e12841. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12841. Epub 2020 May 27.
PMID: 32458529RESULTHikichi H, Kondo K, Takeda T, Kawachi I. Social interaction and cognitive decline: Results of a 7-year community intervention. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2016 Dec 21;3(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2016.11.003. eCollection 2017 Jan.
PMID: 29067317RESULTKrueger KR, Wilson RS, Kamenetsky JM, Barnes LL, Bienias JL, Bennett DA. Social engagement and cognitive function in old age. Exp Aging Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;35(1):45-60. doi: 10.1080/03610730802545028.
PMID: 19173101RESULTPark DC, Gutchess AH, Meade ML, Stine-Morrow EA. Improving cognitive function in older adults: nontraditional approaches. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jun;62 Spec No 1:45-52. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.45.
PMID: 17565164RESULTChan MY, Haber S, Drew LM, Park DC. Training Older Adults to Use Tablet Computers: Does It Enhance Cognitive Function? Gerontologist. 2016 Jun;56(3):475-84. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu057. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
PMID: 24928557RESULTIizuka A, Suzuki H, Ogawa S, Kobayashi-Cuya KE, Kobayashi M, Inagaki H, Sugiyama M, Awata S, Takebayashi T, Fujiwara Y. Does social interaction influence the effect of cognitive intervention program? A randomized controlled trial using Go game. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;34(2):324-332. doi: 10.1002/gps.5024. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
PMID: 30430635RESULTMyhre JW, Mehl MR, Glisky EL. Cognitive Benefits of Online Social Networking for Healthy Older Adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Sep 1;72(5):752-760. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw025.
PMID: 26984523RESULTCavallini E, Dunlosky J, Bottiroli S, Hertzog C, Vecchi T. Promoting transfer in memory training for older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010 Aug;22(4):314-23. doi: 10.3275/6704. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
PMID: 19966535RESULTValentijn SA, van Hooren SA, Bosma H, Touw DM, Jolles J, van Boxtel MP, Ponds RW. The effect of two types of memory training on subjective and objective memory performance in healthy individuals aged 55 years and older: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Apr;57(1):106-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.05.002.
PMID: 15797159RESULTRouse HJ, Small BJ, Faust ME. Assessment of Cognitive Training & Social Interaction in People with Mild to Moderate Dementia: A Pilot Study. Clin Gerontol. 2019 Jul-Sep;42(4):421-434. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2019.1590489. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
PMID: 30895883RESULTBennett DA, Schneider JA, Tang Y, Arnold SE, Wilson RS. The effect of social networks on the relation between Alzheimer's disease pathology and level of cognitive function in old people: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2006 May;5(5):406-12. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70417-3.
PMID: 16632311RESULTErtel KA, Glymour MM, Berkman LF. Effects of social integration on preserving memory function in a nationally representative US elderly population. Am J Public Health. 2008 Jul;98(7):1215-20. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.113654. Epub 2008 May 29.
PMID: 18511736RESULTVerhaeghen P, Marcoen A, Goossens L. Improving memory performance in the aged through mnemonic training: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Aging. 1992 Jun;7(2):242-51. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.7.2.242.
PMID: 1535198RESULTFlynn TM, Storandt M. Supplemental group discussions in memory training for older adults. Psychol Aging. 1990 Jun;5(2):178-81. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.5.2.178.
PMID: 2378683RESULTChiu HF, Chan CK, Lam LC, Ng KO, Li SW, Wong M, Chan WF. The modified Fuld Verbal Fluency Test: a validation study in Hong Kong. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997 Sep;52(5):P247-50. doi: 10.1093/geronb/52b.5.p247.
PMID: 9310094RESULTFairchild JK, Friedman L, Rosen AC, Yesavage JA. Which older adults maintain benefit from cognitive training? Use of signal detection methods to identify long-term treatment gains. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Apr;25(4):607-16. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002049. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
PMID: 23237099RESULTWechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition: Administration and Scoring Manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessment.
RESULTCorsi, P. M. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michal Lavidor, Prof.
Department of Psychology, and the Gonda Brain Research center, Bar Ilan University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2021
First Posted
August 23, 2021
Study Start
November 18, 2018
Primary Completion
February 3, 2019
Study Completion
February 24, 2019
Last Updated
August 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the main author.