Sponsor study identifier
interventional
19
1 country
1
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)The digital workflow in dental implantology has been used for planning the cases with the intraoral scanners and computer tomography, together helping clinicians to be more accurate and precise. Today, thanks to digital technology clinicians can plan from surgical to the final prosthesis using 3D models and cad-cam machines. The aim of this research is to validate the full digital workflow for the single-tooth implant rehabilitation. A total of 19 patients (22 implants) were included in the present study with mean follow-up time of 2 years. A full-digital workflow was performed on each patient through the design and printing of a surgical guide, the taking of the impression with an intraoral scanner and the CAD-CAM design of the crowns.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
January 1, 2017
Actual (reported)June 1, 2020
Actual (reported)July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)August 7, 2021
Actual (reported)August 18, 2021
Actual (reported)Predictability in cases of intercalated edentulism
Implant success
1 year
Early peri-implantitis and failed osseointegration.
For all patients included in the study, a digital impression was taken using an intraoral scanner. A CBCT exam was performed on the mandibular or maxillary jaw with the missing tooth. The stl. and the dicom. files were then superimposed to allow the surgical planning. Then it was elevated and reflected to increase the volume on the buccal side and exposed the bone surface. After this point, the implant was inserted, and another digital impression was taken. Sutures 6.0 were positioned after healing abutment positioning to stabilize the soft tissues. The final abutment and the provisional were designed and manufactured using cad-cam technology. One week thereafter, definitive abutment was positioned. Provisional restoration was then cemented using provisional cement removing all the possible occlusal contacts both in protrusive and in lateral positions. Three months thereafter, once osteointegration was obtained, definitive zirconia restoration was positioned and cemented.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Luigi Canullo
Rome, 00185, Italy
da Silva Salomao GV, Chun EP, Panegaci RDS, Santos FT. Analysis of Digital Workflow in Implantology. Case Rep Dent. 2021 Feb 15;2021:6655908. doi: 10.1155/2021/6655908. eCollection 2021.
Stanley M, Paz AG, Miguel I, Coachman C. Fully digital workflow, integrating dental scan, smile design and CAD-CAM: case report. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Aug 7;18(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0597-0.
Flugge T, Derksen W, Te Poel J, Hassan B, Nelson K, Wismeijer D. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Sep;28(9):1113-1118. doi: 10.1111/clr.12925. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
Luigi Canullo, Dentistry
Private Practice
19 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
August 7, 2021
First Posted
August 18, 2021
Study Start
Adjunctive Benefit of Xenograft Plus a Membrane During Sinus Crestal Approach
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Mangano FG, Admakin O, Bonacina M, Lerner H, Rutkunas V, Mangano C. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01254-9.
January 1, 2017
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Actual (reported)Last Updated
August 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Individual patient data will be available on private request to the principal investigator
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: