Marginal Bone Level Around Implants With Definitive Abutments
Marginal Bone Levels Around Implants With Definitive Abutments Of One and Three Millimeters: A One Year Of Follow Up Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
69
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the peri-implant crestal bone level around implants placed 1.5 mm subcrestally, with a 1 mm or 3 mm definitive abutment height at the time of implant placement after 1 year. Patients were selected from the Department of Periodontology at Universitat Internacional de Catalunya. X-rays were taken at the time of implant placement, 8-12 weeks after placement, after screwing the provisional rehabilitation and at 12 months. An examiner indicated the crestal marginal bone level, the marginal bone level of the implant, and the marginal bone level of the abutment . The examiner, independent to the study, carried out the radiographic analysis using the Image J software on periapical radiographs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2020
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.5 years
November 18, 2019
January 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change from Baseline Bone Loss, at 8-12 weeks and 1 year.
X-rays were taken at the time of implant placement, 8-12 weeks after placement, after screwing the provisional rehabilitation and at 12 months.
baseline, 8-12 weeks and 1 year
Mucosal thickness (MT)
Mucosal thickness (MT) before placement of the implant using a PCP-UNC15 periodontal probe. This measure will be compared with the abutment high and bone loss at 1 year.
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change from Baseline the resonance frequency analysis at 8-12 weeks and 1 year.
baseline, 8-12 weeks and 1 year
Plaque index at 1 year
1 year
Bleeding on probing at 1 year
1 year
Probing depth at 1 year
1 year
Study Arms (2)
A: Abutments of 1 mm
EXPERIMENTALDefinitive abutments of 1 mm height were located.
B: Abutments of 3 mm
EXPERIMENTALDefinitive abutments of 3 mm height were located.
Interventions
The placement of the implant was done following the manufacturing protocol and using a surgical guide according to the radiological guide previously used. At this time, the Permanent® abutment of 1 or 3 mm was chosen randomly and was placed at 35 Ncm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female ≥18 years old;
- Controlled ASA1 or ASA2 patient;
- Healthy periodontium or with controlled periodontal disease;
- Need for rehabilitation with implants in partially posterior edentulous sextants;
- Full Mouth Plaque Score (FMPS) less than 20% at the time of surgery;
- Collaborating patients.
- According to the implant location:
- Healed posterior sites, with a minimum of 2 months post-extraction;
- Ridge width of 7 mm or more and of 10 mm of height to the mandibular nerve and 8 mm to the maxillary sinus;
- Minimum keratinized mucosa (KM) width of 4 mm;
- Antagonist dentition having a fixed restoration or natural teeth, (5) restorative space greater than 5 mm.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with endocrine, immunological or metabolic alterations;
- Pregnancy, allergy to any metallic component of the implant;
- Drug consumption or alcoholism;
- Tobacco ≥10 cig/d and
- Severe bruxism and TMJ pathology.
- According to the implant location:
- Require regeneration techniques;
- Width of KM less than 2 mm at any implant site;
- Infections in the treatment area;
- Absence of implant primary stability and
- Being unable to perform prosthetically guided screw-retained restorations.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Barcelona, 08195, Spain
Related Publications (12)
Blanco J, Pico A, Caneiro L, Novoa L, Batalla P, Martin-Lancharro P. Effect of abutment height on interproximal implant bone level in the early healing: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jan;29(1):108-117. doi: 10.1111/clr.13108. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
PMID: 29222809BACKGROUNDBorges T, Leitao B, Pereira M, Carvalho A, Galindo-Moreno P. Influence of the abutment height and connection timing in early peri-implant marginal bone changes: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Sep;29(9):907-914. doi: 10.1111/clr.13343.
PMID: 30259582BACKGROUNDChen Z, Lin CY, Li J, Wang HL, Yu H. Influence of abutment height on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jul;122(1):14-21.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.003. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
PMID: 30782461BACKGROUNDGalindo-Moreno P, Leon-Cano A, Ortega-Oller I, Monje A, Suarez F, OValle F, Spinato S, Catena A. Prosthetic Abutment Height is a Key Factor in Peri-implant Marginal Bone Loss. J Dent Res. 2014 Jul;93(7 Suppl):80S-85S. doi: 10.1177/0022034513519800. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
PMID: 24621670BACKGROUNDLinkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. Reaction of crestal bone around implants depending on mucosal tissue thickness. A 1-year prospective clinical study. Stomatologija. 2009;11(3):83-91.
PMID: 19996674BACKGROUNDLinkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L. Influence of Vertical Soft Tissue Thickness on Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants with Platform Switching: A Comparative Clinical Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1228-36. doi: 10.1111/cid.12222. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
PMID: 24673875BACKGROUNDMolina A, Sanz-Sanchez I, Martin C, Blanco J, Sanz M. The effect of one-time abutment placement on interproximal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissues: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Apr;28(4):443-452. doi: 10.1111/clr.12818. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
PMID: 27016157BACKGROUNDNovoa L, Batalla P, Caneiro L, Pico A, Linares A, Blanco J. Influence of Abutment Height on Maintenance of Peri-implant Crestal Bone at Bone-Level Implants: A 3-Year Follow-up Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Sep/Oct;37(5):721-727. doi: 10.11607/prd.2762.
PMID: 28817138BACKGROUNDPuisys A, Linkevicius T. The influence of mucosal tissue thickening on crestal bone stability around bone-level implants. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):123-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12301. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
PMID: 24313250BACKGROUNDSpinato S, Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Bernardello F, Messina M, Zaffe D. Biological width establishment around dental implants is influenced by abutment height irrespective of vertical mucosal thickness: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Jul;30(7):649-659. doi: 10.1111/clr.13450. Epub 2019 May 12.
PMID: 31033035BACKGROUNDVervaeke S, Dierens M, Besseler J, De Bruyn H. The influence of initial soft tissue thickness on peri-implant bone remodeling. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Apr;16(2):238-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00474.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
PMID: 22758656BACKGROUNDCanullo L, Camacho-Alonso F, Tallarico M, Meloni SM, Xhanari E, Penarrocha-Oltra D. Mucosa Thickness and Peri-implant Crestal Bone Stability: A Clinical and Histologic Prospective Cohort Trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 May/June;32(5):675-681. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5349. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
PMID: 28296981BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jose Nart
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The surgeon was unaware of the abutment height until after the insertion of the implant. Patients were unknown the abutment group. The examiner, independent to the study, carried out the radiographic analysis.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chairman and Program Director, Department of Periodontology at UIC Barcelona
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2019
First Posted
January 18, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share