Intravenous(IV) vs. Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Cardiac Surgery
IV vs. Erector Spinae Plane Blocks-Cardiac Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Interfascial plane blocks have been developed for analgesia, among which the erector spinae plane (ESP) has gained popularity. The ESP block has been hypothesized to provide truncal analgesia by spread of local anesthetic into the paravertebral space. Recent studies have contested this idea showing unreliability in the spread of the local anesthetic into the paravertebral space.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Aug 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 4, 2024
CompletedApril 9, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.6 years
August 2, 2021
August 13, 2024
March 23, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Quantitate the Amount of Opioid Medication Required to Provide Pain Relief-Cumulative First 48 Hours
To assess if either route (IV or ESP catheter) of lidocaine provided maximal pain relief when compared to its counterpart, the type and amount of medication provided the subject will be recorded. Cumulative opioid usage amounts required to provide relief during the first 48 hours will be tabulated in morphine equivalents. A comparison will be made between the two route to see if one route is optimal over the other. The variables will be presented as median and interquartile range.
48 hours post surgical intervention
Compare Pain Score Reported by Subject 48 Hours Postoperatively
Using a Numeric Rating Scale, patients are asked to report their pain on a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 is the most imaginable. The variables will be presented as median and interquartile range.
48 hours post surgical intervention
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Quantitate the Amount of Opioid Medication Required to Provide Pain Relief-0 to 24 Hours Post Surgical Intervention
First 24 hours post surgical intervention
Quantitate the Amount of Opioid Medication Required to Provide Pain Relief-24 to 48 Hours Post Surgical Intervention
From 24 to 48 hours post surgical intervention
Pain Score at 24 Hours Postoperatively
24 hours post surgical intervention
Quantify the Number of Subjects Who Had Lidocaine Plasma Levels Greater Than 5 Micrograms/Milliliter.
24 hours post intervention
Study Arms (2)
Erector Spinae Plane Block-Administration of Lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALBilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane catheter placement for the administration of lidocaine. Dose will be 2 mg/kg ideal body weight. Bolus will be divided equally between the two ESP catheters. This is followed by lidocaine infusion via ESP catheter at 2 mg/kg/hr for 48 hours after catheter placement.
Intravenous-Administration of Lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubject will receive a bolus of lidocaine at 2 mg/kg ideal body weight. This is followed by lidocaine infusion via intravenous route at 2 mg/kg/hr for 48 hours.
Interventions
Lidocaine will be administered via intravenously. Initial dose will be at 2 mg/kg ideal body weight followed by dosing at 2 mg/kg/hr for 48 hours
Lidocaine will be administered via ESP catheter. Initial dose will be at 2 mg/kg ideal body weight split between two catheters followed by dosing at 2 mg/kg/hr for 48 hours
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergoing elective cardiac surgery for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or valve surgery via sternotomy.
- English speaking
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery
- Allergy to medications (ie lidocaine)
- BMI less than 20 or greater than 50
- Major liver or kidney dysfunction or other pre-existing major organ dysfunction
- Revision cardiac surgery
- Surgery via thoracotomy
- Off-pump coronary artery bypass
- Narcotic dependent (Opioid intake morphine equivalents greater than 10mg/day for more than 3 months
- Chronic pain (ie fibromyalgia)
- Significant central nervous system or respiratory disease
- Hematological disorders or de-ranged coagulation parameters
- Psychiatric illness that impedes subject from providing informed consent
- Pre-operative neurological deficits
- Language barrier
- Inability to provide informed consent
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Archit Sharmalead
Study Sites (1)
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Ours is a single center trial. This likely should be investigated at multiple institutions with different surgical anesthesia groups for proper validation.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Archit Sharma, M.D.
- Organization
- University of Iowa Healthcare
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Archit Sharma, MD
University of Iowa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2021
First Posted
August 9, 2021
Study Start
August 15, 2021
Primary Completion
April 7, 2023
Study Completion
April 30, 2023
Last Updated
April 9, 2025
Results First Posted
September 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share