NCT04993859

Brief Summary

The over-arching aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of two specific anti-cancer chemotherapies, vincristine and doxorubicin, on bladder function and urine composition.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
152

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
2mo left

Started Jun 2021

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress97%
Jun 2021Jul 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 2, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 28, 2021

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 6, 2021

Completed
4.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 9, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 9, 2026

Last Updated

October 15, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.1 years

First QC Date

July 28, 2021

Last Update Submit

October 13, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Proportion of non-normal niUDS patterns between groups

    a. Patterns will be scored by blinded reviewers b. Will calculate an Inter-rater Kappa correlation co-efficient i. Utilize consensus review for discrepancies between reviewers and between the patient's 1st/2nd niUDS for the final assignment ii. Will calculate an intra-test reliability (compare correlation between 1st and 2nd patter) c. Chi-square test to compare proportions of non-normal vs. normal pattern type i. Group 1a vs. 2a ii. Group 1b vs. 2b d. Sample Size Calculation: Based on published data of niUDS patterns in children with normal bladder function, we expect 15% of those children in Group 2 to have non-normal niUDS patterns. We hypothesize that 40% of children in Group 1 to have non-normal niUDS patterns. 38 subjects in each gender sub-group provide 80% power to detect this 25% difference with an one-sided chi-square test with an alpha of 0.05.

    Immediately after niUDS done at the first visit

  • Proportion of Elevated Post-Void Residual (PVR) between groups

    a. Will use an "average PVR" between the 1st/2nd niUDS for the analysis b. Chi-square test to compare proportions of elevated PVR i. Group 1a vs. 2a ii. Group 1b vs. 2b c. Sample Size Calculation: Based on published data of PVR in children with normal bladder function, we expect 1.5% of those children in Group 2 to have elevated PVR. We hypothesize that 25% of children in Group 1 to have an elevated PVR. 21 subjects in each gender sub-group provide 80% power to detect this 23.5% difference with an one-sided chi-square test with an alpha of 0.05.

    13 months

  • Compare Peak Flow Rates (Qmax) between groups

    a. Will use the average of the two Qmax between the 1st/2nd flow rate for the analysis b. Two group t-test for comparing continuous variables (Qmax) i. Group 1a vs. 2a ii. Group 1b vs. 2b c. Sample Size Calculation: 38 subjects in Group 1a and 2a provide 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.7 (mean difference divided by the common standard deviation) using a 2-sided two-group test with an alpha of 0.05. if the outcome is not normally distributed, transformation will be carried out so the distribution will be approximately normal. This power calculation also applies to the comparison between Group 1b vs 2b

    13 momths

  • Compare Average Flow Rates (Qavg) for age/gender

    a. Will use the average of the two Qavg between the 1st/2nd flow rate for the analysis b. Two group ttest for comparing continuous variables (Qavg) i. Group 1a vs. 2a ii. Group 1b vs. 2b c. See the power calculation in 3c.

    13 months

  • Compare Urinary Biomarker Levels between groups

    1\. Compare urinary biomarker levels between groups i. ATP, BDNF, NGF ii. Two-group t-test for comparing continuous variables 1. Group 1 vs. 2 2. Sub-analysis 1. Group 1a vs. 2a 2. Group 1b vs. 2b The sample size calculation in 1d can apply to each biomarker. Based on published data in other populations with BD, for NGF, ATP and BDNF, we hypothesize to detect a difference of these urinary biomarkers 2x higher in Group 2 (Elevated DVSS scores) vs. Group 1 (Normal DVSS scores). A mixed effects model will be used to estimate and compare a biomarker expression between the two groups by incorporating the individual measurements on each subject into the model, where gender and group assignment will be the predictor. Interaction term between group and gender will be considered to study the effect modification by gender on a biomarker if possible.

    13 months

Study Arms (4)

Male Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score ≥ 9

Childhood cancer survivors treated with DOX and/or VCR with evidence of BD on DVSS

Diagnostic Test: Non-invasive Urodynamic Test (niUDS)Diagnostic Test: Urinary proteomic screenOther: Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score Survey (DVSS)

Female Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score ≥ 6

Childhood cancer survivors treated with DOX and/or VCR with evidence of BD on DVSS

Diagnostic Test: Non-invasive Urodynamic Test (niUDS)Diagnostic Test: Urinary proteomic screenOther: Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score Survey (DVSS)

Male Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score < 9

Childhood cancer survivors treated with DOX and/or VCR without evidence of BD on DVSS

Diagnostic Test: Non-invasive Urodynamic Test (niUDS)Diagnostic Test: Urinary proteomic screenOther: Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score Survey (DVSS)

Female Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score < 6

Childhood cancer survivors treated with DOX and/or VCR without evidence of BD on DVSS

Diagnostic Test: Non-invasive Urodynamic Test (niUDS)Diagnostic Test: Urinary proteomic screenOther: Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score Survey (DVSS)

Interventions

A noninvasive urodynamics is a simple test used to evaluate urinary flow.

Female Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score < 6Female Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score ≥ 6Male Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score < 9Male Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score ≥ 9

Urine proteomics is a powerful platform to identify urinary excreted proteins and peptides in different stages of disease or therapy and to determine their quantity, functions, and interaction.

Female Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score < 6Female Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score ≥ 6Male Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score < 9Male Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score ≥ 9

The Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score provides accurate and objective grading of voiding behaviors of children.

Female Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score < 6Female Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score ≥ 6Male Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score < 9Male Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score ≥ 9

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 13 Years
Sexall(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsStudy groups and sub-groups will be assigned by gender
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Childhood cancer survivors that have been treated with a chemotherapy regimen including VCR and/or DOX, completion of chemotherapy at least one year prior to study enrollment and survey completion.

You may qualify if:

  • Children aged 5-13 years old
  • A history of cancer
  • Treatment with a chemotherapy regimen including VCR and/or DOX
  • Completion of chemotherapy at least one year prior to study enrollment and survey completion.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a:
  • Primary pelvic tumor
  • Pelvic irradiation
  • Pre-existing bladder/bowel dysfunction
  • Spinal defects
  • Neurologic disorder
  • Neuro-oncologic tumor or brain metastasis
  • Cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide therapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Children's Hospital Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • Nicholas Cost, MD

    Children's Hospital Colorado

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2021

First Posted

August 6, 2021

Study Start

June 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 9, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 9, 2026

Last Updated

October 15, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Patient Data will be shared after written request to study PI and after approval by local IRB and study committee

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
1 year after publication, for a total of 5 years
Access Criteria
Written proposal with IRB approval

Locations