Impact of Chemotherapy on Urinary Biomarkers and Non-Invasive Urodynamics in Children
3 other identifiers
observational
152
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The over-arching aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of two specific anti-cancer chemotherapies, vincristine and doxorubicin, on bladder function and urine composition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2021
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 9, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 9, 2026
October 15, 2025
October 1, 2025
5.1 years
July 28, 2021
October 13, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Proportion of non-normal niUDS patterns between groups
a. Patterns will be scored by blinded reviewers b. Will calculate an Inter-rater Kappa correlation co-efficient i. Utilize consensus review for discrepancies between reviewers and between the patient's 1st/2nd niUDS for the final assignment ii. Will calculate an intra-test reliability (compare correlation between 1st and 2nd patter) c. Chi-square test to compare proportions of non-normal vs. normal pattern type i. Group 1a vs. 2a ii. Group 1b vs. 2b d. Sample Size Calculation: Based on published data of niUDS patterns in children with normal bladder function, we expect 15% of those children in Group 2 to have non-normal niUDS patterns. We hypothesize that 40% of children in Group 1 to have non-normal niUDS patterns. 38 subjects in each gender sub-group provide 80% power to detect this 25% difference with an one-sided chi-square test with an alpha of 0.05.
Immediately after niUDS done at the first visit
Proportion of Elevated Post-Void Residual (PVR) between groups
a. Will use an "average PVR" between the 1st/2nd niUDS for the analysis b. Chi-square test to compare proportions of elevated PVR i. Group 1a vs. 2a ii. Group 1b vs. 2b c. Sample Size Calculation: Based on published data of PVR in children with normal bladder function, we expect 1.5% of those children in Group 2 to have elevated PVR. We hypothesize that 25% of children in Group 1 to have an elevated PVR. 21 subjects in each gender sub-group provide 80% power to detect this 23.5% difference with an one-sided chi-square test with an alpha of 0.05.
13 months
Compare Peak Flow Rates (Qmax) between groups
a. Will use the average of the two Qmax between the 1st/2nd flow rate for the analysis b. Two group t-test for comparing continuous variables (Qmax) i. Group 1a vs. 2a ii. Group 1b vs. 2b c. Sample Size Calculation: 38 subjects in Group 1a and 2a provide 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.7 (mean difference divided by the common standard deviation) using a 2-sided two-group test with an alpha of 0.05. if the outcome is not normally distributed, transformation will be carried out so the distribution will be approximately normal. This power calculation also applies to the comparison between Group 1b vs 2b
13 momths
Compare Average Flow Rates (Qavg) for age/gender
a. Will use the average of the two Qavg between the 1st/2nd flow rate for the analysis b. Two group ttest for comparing continuous variables (Qavg) i. Group 1a vs. 2a ii. Group 1b vs. 2b c. See the power calculation in 3c.
13 months
Compare Urinary Biomarker Levels between groups
1\. Compare urinary biomarker levels between groups i. ATP, BDNF, NGF ii. Two-group t-test for comparing continuous variables 1. Group 1 vs. 2 2. Sub-analysis 1. Group 1a vs. 2a 2. Group 1b vs. 2b The sample size calculation in 1d can apply to each biomarker. Based on published data in other populations with BD, for NGF, ATP and BDNF, we hypothesize to detect a difference of these urinary biomarkers 2x higher in Group 2 (Elevated DVSS scores) vs. Group 1 (Normal DVSS scores). A mixed effects model will be used to estimate and compare a biomarker expression between the two groups by incorporating the individual measurements on each subject into the model, where gender and group assignment will be the predictor. Interaction term between group and gender will be considered to study the effect modification by gender on a biomarker if possible.
13 months
Study Arms (4)
Male Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score ≥ 9
Childhood cancer survivors treated with DOX and/or VCR with evidence of BD on DVSS
Female Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score ≥ 6
Childhood cancer survivors treated with DOX and/or VCR with evidence of BD on DVSS
Male Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score < 9
Childhood cancer survivors treated with DOX and/or VCR without evidence of BD on DVSS
Female Cancer Survivors with DVSS Score < 6
Childhood cancer survivors treated with DOX and/or VCR without evidence of BD on DVSS
Interventions
A noninvasive urodynamics is a simple test used to evaluate urinary flow.
Urine proteomics is a powerful platform to identify urinary excreted proteins and peptides in different stages of disease or therapy and to determine their quantity, functions, and interaction.
The Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score provides accurate and objective grading of voiding behaviors of children.
Eligibility Criteria
Childhood cancer survivors that have been treated with a chemotherapy regimen including VCR and/or DOX, completion of chemotherapy at least one year prior to study enrollment and survey completion.
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 5-13 years old
- A history of cancer
- Treatment with a chemotherapy regimen including VCR and/or DOX
- Completion of chemotherapy at least one year prior to study enrollment and survey completion.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a:
- Primary pelvic tumor
- Pelvic irradiation
- Pre-existing bladder/bowel dysfunction
- Spinal defects
- Neurologic disorder
- Neuro-oncologic tumor or brain metastasis
- Cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicholas Cost, MD
Children's Hospital Colorado
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2021
First Posted
August 6, 2021
Study Start
June 2, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 9, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 9, 2026
Last Updated
October 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- 1 year after publication, for a total of 5 years
- Access Criteria
- Written proposal with IRB approval
Patient Data will be shared after written request to study PI and after approval by local IRB and study committee