Effectiveness and Equivalence of an Internet-based Virtual Classroom Intervention for Psychosomatic Aftercare
Studies on the Effectiveness and Equivalence of an Internet-based Virtual Classroom Intervention for Psychosomatic Aftercare According to the Hannover Curriculum
1 other identifier
interventional
6,023
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Outpatient psychosomatic aftercare after inpatient rehabilitation pursues the goal of helping patients to transfer the achieved rehabilitation result in everyday life and professional life. The Hanover Curriculum has been established as a treatment programme for psychosomatic aftercare. This comprises 25 weekly group sessions and two single therapies at the beginning and at the end of the therapy. In Germany a vast majority of rehabilitants in a psychosomatic rehabilitation clinic has an indication for psychosomatic aftercare, but it is used only by less than half of the patients due to a lack of aftercare therapists. If there is a therapist in the patient's vicinity, there are often long travelling times to the therapist or the patients might feel stigmatized participating in a face-to-face therapy. Thus, the expansion of internet-based aftercare services is recommended. Advantages are that they can be carried out at home, possible cost and time savings and improvement of the care situation. Several meta-analyses provide high evidence for the effectiveness of internet-based therapy offers in depressive and anxiety disorders that are frequent among psychosomatic rehabilitation patients. First randomised controlled studies show that internet-based aftercare services can lead to a symptomatic improvement and to a reduction of relapses. It is currently not clear whether established aftercare concepts, such as the Curriculum Hannover, are also effective in an internet-based format (Curriculum Hannover Online). The present project consists of a superiority study, examining whether participation in Curriculum- Hannover-Online leads to a stronger adoption and maintenance of the health improvements achieved in inpatient rehabilitation in comparison to care as usual, and an equivalnece study, examining, wether the Curriculum Hannover Online is an equivalent treatment option to the existing face-to-face aftercare therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 14, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedMay 9, 2022
May 1, 2022
4.8 years
July 14, 2021
May 6, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change of psychic and somatoform complaints
according to the HEALTH-49 (Rabung et al., 2009)
up to 18 months
Secondary Outcomes (11)
change of depressiveness
up to 18 months
change of phobic anxiety
up to 18 months
change of somatoform complaints
up to 18 months
change of mental well-being
up to 18 months
change of interactional difficulties
up to 18 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Intervention group 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORwebbased aftercare
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONcare as usual
Intervention group 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORwebbased aftercare
face-to-face aftercare
ACTIVE COMPARATORface-to-face aftercare
Interventions
The methodology uses a natural variation design within the Dr. Becker Clinical Group. The interventions consist of a face-to-face or a digital psychosomatic aftercare basing upon the concept of the Curriculum Hanover. A control group is included that does not receive these two interventions (but receives a similar rehabilitation treatment to the intervention groups).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients after psychosomatic rehabilitation
- indication for outpatient psychosomatic aftercare are included in both studies.
- access to a standard PC and broadband internet connection is required (DSL or LTE).
You may not qualify if:
- Persons who are
- are discharged with a capacity of less than three hours per day on the general labour market,
- receive or have applied for a pension of at least two-thirds of the full pension,
- receive a benefit that is regularly paid until the start of an old-age pension.
- suffering from acute addiction disorder / acute psychosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dr. Becker Hospital Group
Cologne, 50968, Germany
Related Publications (13)
Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Riper H, Hedman E. Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;13(3):288-95. doi: 10.1002/wps.20151.
PMID: 25273302BACKGROUNDArnberg FK, Linton SJ, Hultcrantz M, Heintz E, Jonsson U. Internet-delivered psychological treatments for mood and anxiety disorders: a systematic review of their efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. PLoS One. 2014 May 20;9(5):e98118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098118. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24844847BACKGROUNDCheng SK, Dizon J. Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81(4):206-16. doi: 10.1159/000335379. Epub 2012 May 11.
PMID: 22585048BACKGROUNDCuijpers P, van Straten A, Warmerdam L, van Rooy MJ. Recruiting participants for interventions to prevent the onset of depressive disorders: possible ways to increase participation rates. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun 25;10:181. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-181.
PMID: 20579332BACKGROUNDCuijpers P, Marks IM, van Straten A, Cavanagh K, Gega L, Andersson G. Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(2):66-82. doi: 10.1080/16506070802694776.
PMID: 20183688BACKGROUNDEbert DD, Lehr D, Boss L, Riper H, Cuijpers P, Andersson G, Thiart H, Heber E, Berking M. Efficacy of an internet-based problem-solving training for teachers: results of a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014 Nov;40(6):582-96. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3449. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
PMID: 25121986BACKGROUNDEbert D, Tarnowski T, Gollwitzer M, Sieland B, Berking M. A transdiagnostic internet-based maintenance treatment enhances the stability of outcome after inpatient cognitive behavioral therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2013;82(4):246-56. doi: 10.1159/000345967. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
PMID: 23736751BACKGROUNDHaug T, Nordgreen T, Ost LG, Havik OE. Self-help treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of effects and potential moderators. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;32(5):425-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
PMID: 22681915BACKGROUNDLin J, Ebert DD, Lehr D, Berking M, Baumeister H. [Internet based cognitive behavioral interventions: state of the art and implementation possibilities in rehabilitation]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2013 Jun;52(3):155-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343491. Epub 2013 Jun 12. German.
PMID: 23761204BACKGROUNDMoher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869. No abstract available.
PMID: 20332511BACKGROUNDWolever RQ, Bobinet KJ, McCabe K, Mackenzie ER, Fekete E, Kusnick CA, Baime M. Effective and viable mind-body stress reduction in the workplace: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012 Apr;17(2):246-258. doi: 10.1037/a0027278. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
PMID: 22352291BACKGROUNDRichards D, Richardson T. Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Jun;32(4):329-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
PMID: 22466510BACKGROUNDLippke S, Gao L, Keller FM, Becker P, Dahmen A. Adherence With Online Therapy vs Face-to-Face Therapy and With Online Therapy vs Care as Usual: Secondary Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 3;23(11):e31274. doi: 10.2196/31274.
PMID: 34730541DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alina Dahmen, MD
Dr. Becker Hospital Group
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 14, 2021
First Posted
August 4, 2021
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
May 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be published. Other researchers are welcome to get in contact with the PI to get access to anonymous data.