Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Zenflow Spring System
BREEZE
1 other identifier
interventional
279
1 country
7
Brief Summary
Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Zenflow Spring System in relieving LUTS associated with BPH.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
ExpectedApril 11, 2024
April 1, 2024
2.8 years
July 13, 2021
April 9, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Safety - The need for urinary catheterization
The rate of extended post-operative urinary catheterization (\> 7 days from treatment) for inability to void among patients treated with the Zenflow Spring System.
Greater than 7 days after procedure
Safety - Adverse Events
The rate of device or procedure related serious adverse events in both the Treatment Arm and the Sham Arm.
Procedure through 12 months
Effectiveness of the Spring Implant in reducing symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) as compared to Sham
The Treatment Arm will be considered superior to the Control Arm (Sham) when the mean 3-month improvement from baseline score for the IPSS symptom questionnaire demonstrates a minimum statistical margin of 25% compared to mean improvement from baseline for the Control Arm (Sham) alone.
Procedure to 3 months
Effectiveness- Symptoms Improvement
The mean percent change in IPSS in the treatment arm is at least 30% improvement over the Patient's pre-treatment baseline score.
Procedure to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Safety - Adverse Events
Procedure through 60 months
Safety - Pain Assessment Questionnaire
Procedure through 3 months
Safety - Sexual Health Questionnaire 1
3 months post procedure through 24 months post procedure
Safety - Sexual Health Questionnaire 2
3 months post procedure through 24 months post procedure
Safety - Device Removal
Procedure through 60 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Roll-in Cohort
OTHEREach Investigator will be allowed to treat up to 3 roll-in subjects with the Spring Implant prior to initiation of randomization. Roll-in patients will be followed for 60 months.
Treatment Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORIncludes all patients who are randomized and start the treatment procedure. During the procedure the patient will be shielded from the treatment area and cystoscopy screen. The patient and site personnel administering follow-up assessments will be blinded to the study arm through the 3-month follow-up visit. Unblinding will occur at 3 months post-procedure after the assessments are completed. Follow up will continue for 60 months.
Control Arm
SHAM COMPARATORIncludes all patients who receive a sham procedure. Patients will be shielded from the treatment area and cystoscopy screen. A Foley Catheter is placed into the patient's bladder and inflated. Additionally, devices will be used to produce mock deployment sounds of the Zenflow procedure. Once complete, the balloon will be deflated and the catheter will be removed, completing the procedure. Control arm subjects are followed for 3 months and exited from the study unless they elect and qualify for Crossover.
Crossover Cohort
OTHERControl Arm (Sham) patients can receive treatment with the Zenflow Spring System after their 3-month follow-up assessments are completed, and their symptoms warrant treatment and enrollment criteria are met. The study visit follow-up schedule will restart and the subject will be followed for 60 months post Zenflow Spring implantation. Unless treated with the Spring System, the subject will be exited from the study once they have completed their 3-month follow-up visit.
Interventions
The Zenflow Spring Implant is an electropolished and passivated nickel titanium alloy (nitinol) implant. The implant is constructed from a single wire strand formed into ring elements connected by spine sections. There are four sizes of implants ranging from 16 mm to 24 mm in length and 14 mm to 16 mm in diameter to implant in the subject's prostatic urethra. The implant is placed in the urethra using a custom delivery catheter and cystoscope (Spring Scope). The implant is intended to be permanent but can be removed if necessary.
A18 Fr Foley Catheter is placed into the patient's bladder. To mimic the Treatment Arm procedure, the Foley Catheter balloon will be inflated in the bladder. Once inflated, slight tension will be applied against the subject's bladder neck. While tension is being applied the site staff will follow a script to simulate the Zenflow procedural steps. Additionally, devices will be used to produce mock deployment sounds of the Zenflow procedure. Once complete, the balloon will be deflated and the catheter will be removed, completing the procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is able and willing to comply with all the assessments of the study,
- Subject or subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate and has signed the informed consent form,
- ≥ 45 years of age,
- Baseline IPSS score ≥ 13; ≥ 1 in the IPSS voiding to storage sub-score ratio (IPSS-V/S),
- Prostate volume 25 - 80 cc by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), measured within 120 days post study consent,
- Prostatic urethral length between 25 and 45 mm, as measured by cystoscopic pull-back,
- Failed, intolerant, or subject choice to not take a medication regimen for the treatment of LUTS.
You may not qualify if:
- Obstructive intravesical median prostatic lobe as determined by ultrasound (i.e., more than 10 mm intravesical prostatic protrusion on sagittal mid-prostate plane via abdominal ultrasound),
- High bladder neck with the absence of lateral lobe encroachment indicating a high likelihood of primary bladder neck obstruction as determined by the Investigator,
- Urethral stricture, meatal stenosis, or bladder neck stricture - either current or recurrent,
- Anatomical anomalies that will not accommodate the Implant, as determined by cystoscopy (e.g., prostatic urethral length to height geometry),
- Requires indwelling catheter or intermittent catheterization to void,
- Baseline PSA \> 10 ng/mL or confirmed or suspected prostate cancer (Subjects with a PSA level above 2.5 ng/mL, or age specific, or local reference ranges should have prostate cancer excluded to the Investigator's satisfaction),
- One of the following baseline test results, taken from a single uroflowmetry reading:
- Urinary volume void ≤ 125mL (pre-bladder urinary volume of ≥ 150 mL required),
- Peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) of ≤ 5 ml/second or \> 15 mL/second,
- Post- void residual volume (PVR) \> 250 mL
- History of other diseases causing voiding dysfunction including urinary retention (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, diagnosis of neurogenic bladder, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, etc.),
- Subjects with overactive bladder in the absence of benign prostatic obstruction,
- Acute urinary tract infection (UTI) or finding of asymptomatic bacteriuria (Note: subject can be enrolled if the UTI is treated and followed with a negative urine test result), or subjects with history of recurrent UTIs (defined as \> 3 UTIs in the past 12 months),
- Concomitant bladder stones,
- Previous pelvic irradiation or radical pelvic surgery,
- +20 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zenflow, Inc.lead
Study Sites (7)
American Institute of Research
Los Angeles, California, 90017, United States
Northshore University Health System
Glenview, Illinois, 60026, United States
Sheldon Freedman, MD, LTD
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89144, United States
Carolina Urologic Research Associates
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572, United States
Midtown Urology Associates
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Urology Austin, PLLC
Austin, Texas, 78745, United States
Urology of Virginia, PLLC
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23462, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claus Roehrborn, M.D
UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient and site personnel administering follow-up assessments to 3 months will be blinded to the study assignment. Unblinding will occur at 3 months post procedure after follow-up assessments are completed. All patients will be asked post-treatment if they believe they are in the Treatment Arm, Control Arm, or do not know. The blinding questionnaire will be administered at discharge and at the 1-month and 3-month follow-up assessments. Control Arm patients can receive treatment with the Zenflow Spring System within 30 days after their 3-month follow-up assessments are completed, and their symptoms warrant treatment and enrollment criteria are met.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2021
First Posted
August 3, 2021
Study Start
September 30, 2021
Primary Completion
June 30, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share