Comparing KIM to TVT Exact Sling
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Retropubic KIM Sling to TVT Exact Midurethral Sling
1 other identifier
interventional
147
1 country
2
Brief Summary
To assess to the non-inferiority of the retropubic Neomedic Knotless Incontinence Mesh (KIM) sling compared to the Gynecare Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT) Exact sling. Participants: Women 21 years or older with a diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) with objective evidence of SUI planning surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Procedures (methods): Patients will be randomized to receive either the Gynecare TVT Exact sling or the retropubic Neomedic KIM sling. Patients will be followed for 1 year postoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 11, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 28, 2024
CompletedAugust 6, 2024
July 1, 2024
1.8 years
July 22, 2021
August 3, 2023
July 10, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Treatment Success at 6 Weeks After Surgery
Treatment success is defined by a composite outcome of 1) response of No or "no bother" to question #3 on urogenital distress inventory-6 (UDI-6) validated questionnaire AND no retreatment of stress incontinence.
6 weeks after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants With Treatment Success at 1 Year After Surgery
up to 1 year
Number of Participants Requiring Reoperation for Mesh Complications or Urinary Retention Thru 1 Year After Surgery
up to 1 year
Number of Participants With Mesh Exposure Thru 1 Year After Surgery
up to 1 year after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Gynecare TVT Exact sling
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants who are planning surgery for SUI are randomized to have placement of Gynecare TVT Exact sling and followed postoperatively for 1 year.
Neomedic KIM sling
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants who are planning surgery for SUI are randomized to have placement of retropubic Neomedic KIM sling and followed postoperatively for 1 year.
Interventions
Participants will have placement of Gynecare TVT Exact sling.
Participants will have placement of retropubic Neomedic KIM (Knotless Incontinence Mesh) sling
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women greater than or equal to 21 years based on medical chart review
- Diagnosis of SUI or mixed urinary incontinence based on medical chart review
- Objective evidence of SUI as indicated by positive cough stress test or urodynamic stress incontinence during urodynamic testing within the last year prior to enrollment. Medical chart will be reviewed.
- Planning surgery for SUI with/without pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Current pregnancy, desire for future childbearing, less than or equal to 12 months postpartum at the time of enrollment
- Prior history of surgery for SUI based on medical chart review
- Bladder capacity \<200 mL on Urodynamic testing or post-void residual (PVR) \>150 mL on urodynamic testing or bladder scan.
- Non-ambulatory
- Current genitourinary fistula or urethral diverticulum based on pre-operative exam in the medical chart.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
UNC Hospitals Hillsborough Campus
Hillsborough, North Carolina, 27278, United States
Rex Hospital
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, United States
Related Publications (6)
Padilla-Fernandez B, Garcia-Cenador MB, Gomez-Garcia A, Miron-Canelo JA, Gil-Vicente A, Silva-Abuin JM, Lorenzo-Gomez MF. Results of the surgical correction of urinary stress incontinence according to the type of transobturator tape utilized. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013 Sep 26;85(3):149-53. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2013.3.149.
PMID: 24085238BACKGROUNDImamura M, Hudson J, Wallace SA, MacLennan G, Shimonovich M, Omar MI, Javanbakht M, Moloney E, Becker F, Ternent L, Montgomery I, Mackie P, Saraswat L, Monga A, Vale L, Craig D, Brazzelli M. Surgical interventions for women with stress urinary incontinence: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2019 Jun 5;365:l1842. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1842.
PMID: 31167796BACKGROUNDFord AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.
PMID: 28756647BACKGROUNDRichter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, Kraus SR, Chai TC, Lemack GE, Dandreo KJ, Varner RE, Menefee S, Ghetti C, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Khandwala S, Rozanski TA, Johnson H, Schaffer J, Stoddard AM, Holley RL, Nager CW, Moalli P, Mueller E, Arisco AM, Corton M, Tennstedt S, Chang TD, Gormley EA, Litman HJ; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2066-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912658. Epub 2010 May 17.
PMID: 20479459BACKGROUNDChapple CR, MacNeil S. The use of implanted materials for treating women with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Urol. 2019 Jul;29(4):431-436. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000619.
PMID: 30888974BACKGROUNDMargulies SL, Osment AE, Bernard A, Schroeder MN, Askew AL, Agu IS, Kunycky CA, Geller EJ, Willis-Gray M, Chu CM, Wu JM. Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial: KIM Sling With Reusable Trocars Versus TVT Exact Sling. Urogynecology (Phila). 2025 Feb 1;31(2):101-107. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001596. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
PMID: 39514254DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jennifer Wu, MD, MPH, Professor of OBGYN
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Wu, MD, MPH
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christina Kunycky, MD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2021
First Posted
August 2, 2021
Study Start
August 11, 2021
Primary Completion
May 31, 2023
Study Completion
June 28, 2024
Last Updated
August 6, 2024
Results First Posted
August 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Beginning 9 to 36 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- Approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with University of North Carolina (UNC)