Pelvic Floor Muscle Training With a Digital Therapeutic Device to Standard Exercises for Stress Urinary Incontinence
A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training With a Digital Therapeutic Device to Standard Exercises for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Remote Digital Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
369
1 country
3
Brief Summary
A virtual prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of using the leva® Pelvic Digital Health System (PDHS) to perform PFMT compared to a standard home exercise home program for the treatment of SUI/SMUI. The treatment part of the study lasts eight weeks and has two arms. One group will receive routine care consisting of at-home Kegel exercises, and the other will be provided with a leva® device and instructions for use. Subjects in both groups will be assessed at baseline, then at 4 and 8 weeks for change and improvement of their symptoms. They will also be assessed at 6 and12 months after study completion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2020
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 23, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2021
CompletedDecember 9, 2021
January 1, 2021
7 months
August 5, 2020
December 8, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Efficacy - Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)
UDI-6 is a validated questionnaire assessing symptom presence and degree of bother. It will be used to compare the degree of symptom change in the leva arm vs the Kegel arm within and between groups.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Efficacy - Bladder diaries
Bladder diaries evaluating the average number of stress-incontinence episodes in 3 days will be compared within and between groups
Baseline and 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Survey evaluations of incontinence Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI-6)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Patient Reported perception of general health Short Form-20 (SF-20)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Self-reported adherence
4 weeks, 8 weeks
Correlations between self-reported adherence and device reported adherence in the leva group
4 weeks, 8 weeks
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and tolerability)
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Leva PDHS arm
OTHERUpon randomization, subjects randomized to the leva® arm will receive the leva® PDHS, and instructions for how to download the smartphone app to facilitate use of the device. They will be instructed to use leva® based on the in-app training provided. Within the app, subjects will be instructed to use the leva® device to perform PFMT according to the training program provided through the smartphone app associated with the device. This entails 2 ½ minute training sessions, three times daily, 7 days per week for a total of 8 weeks.
Kegel arm
OTHERSubjects randomized to the Kegel arm will be provided links to view instructions on how to perform PFMT (written instructions per the handout adapted from Voices for PFD, the patient advocacy arm of the American Urogynecologic Society), as well as an audio/visual didactic instructing them to perform Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises (PFME) three times daily, seven days per week throughout the 8-week study period.
Interventions
Pelvic floor muscle training using the pelvic digital health system to treat pelvic floor disorders, specifically stress urinary incontinence.
Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), commonly referred to as "Kegel" exercises, is a first line conservative treatment for pelvic floor disorders, specifically stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (SMUI).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥18 years of age
- Capable of giving informed consent
- Possess a smartphone capable of interacting with the ObvioHealth and Renovia apps
- Self-reported SUI/SMUI symptoms of ≥ three months duration
- Diagnosis SMUI based on Medical, Epidemiologic and Social Aspects of Aging (MESA) stress symptom score (Percent of total possible stress score) greater than MESA urge symptom score (percent of total possible urge score)
- English speaking
- Postmenopausal, post hysterectomy, or willing to use an acceptable method of birth control for the duration of the study
- Able to complete a bladder diary using the ObvioHealth app
- Able to complete electronic surveys and upload data
- Willing to provide contact information and respond to remote contact: phone calls, text messages, email
- Willing to participate in the 8-week study with follow up at 6-and 12-months, refraining from the pursuit of treatment for Stress UI using other modalities (i.e. will not wear a pessary, participate in pelvic floor Physical Therapy or surgery) during the first 8 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- Absence of a vagina, per patient report
- Reports seeing or feeling a vaginal bulge or sensation of vaginal bulge
- Diagnosis of any neuromuscular disease that may contribute to UI (i.e., multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, Parkinson's Disease, etc.)
- Non-ambulatory, per patient report
- Currently pregnant or \<6 months post-partum per patient report
- Currently (or within the last 1 month) breast feeding
- Prior surgery for stress UI
- Previous PFMT: 2 visits within the last 3 months under a supervised therapeutic plan of care
- Currently taking, or has taken within the last 2 months, medication to treat UI
- Prior augmentation cystoplasty or artificial sphincter
- Implanted nerve stimulator for urinary symptoms, active within the past 60 days
- Participation in another clinical study within 30 days of screening
- Impaired cognitive function per patient report and evaluation of medication list
- Contraindication to the use of a vaginal probe
- Unable to understand instructions on the use of the leva® PDHS
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Renovia, Inc.lead
- OBVIO HEALTH USA, Inc.collaborator
- University of Alabama at Birminghamcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
University of Alabama *** Virtual Trial May be enrolled from any US Location
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
Southern California Permanente Medical Group*** Virtual Trial May be enrolled from any US Location
Irvine, California, 92618, United States
University of New Mexico *** Virtual Trial May be enrolled from any US Location
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87112, United States
Related Publications (3)
Weinstein MM, Dunivan GC, Guaderrama NM, Richter HE. Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Longitudinal Analysis at 6 and 12 Months. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan 1;141(1):199-206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005036. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
PMID: 36701620DERIVEDWeinstein MM, Dunivan G, Guaderrama NM, Richter HE. Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr 1;139(4):606-615. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004725. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
PMID: 35271539DERIVEDWeinstein MM, Pulliam SJ, Richter HE. Randomized trial comparing efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with a digital therapeutic motion-based device to standard pelvic floor exercises for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUV trial): An all-virtual trial design. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jun;105:106406. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106406. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
PMID: 33866003DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Holly Richter, MD PhD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Milena Weinstein, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gena Dunnivan, MD
University of New Mexico
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Noelani M Guaderrama, MD
Southern California Permanentae
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Subjects will be randomized to either the leva® arm or Kegel arm on a 1 to 1 ratio using block randomization. Prior to initiation of the trial, a randomization sequence will be generated by the ObvioHealth system. Participants will be automatically allocated the next available slot in the sequence at the time of their randomization and assigned to the leva® or Kegel group accordingly
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2020
First Posted
August 11, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2020
Primary Completion
April 23, 2021
Study Completion
September 1, 2021
Last Updated
December 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share