NCT04985396

Brief Summary

Plantar fasciitis (PF) is the one of the most common orthopaedic problem resulting in heel pain. Previous evidence suggests that Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) injection has better outcome in the long run as compared to the local steroid injection (SI). Although over the past many years, steroid injection was considered as the choice of treatment after the failure of conservative treatment methods, PRP therapy has shown promising results in the treatment of plantar fasciitis now-a-days. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of PRP injection compared with Steroid injection in the treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. A hospital-based randomized clinical trial study will be carried out to compare the efficacy of the therapeutic effect between steroid injection and Platelet Rich Plasma injection in plantar fasciitis. A representative sample size of 78 patients aged 18 years to 60 years suffering from plantar fasciitis with failed conservative treatment will be intervened. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring system will be recorded pre- and post-injection phases at 3 months and 6 months period. Statistical analyses will be performed using independent t-test and Mann Whitney U test to compare between the two means. The outcome of this study will help to guide the physicians to choose the better therapeutic approach among the patients suffering from plantar fasciitis.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
78

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 14, 2021

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 25, 2021

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 2, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 26, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

July 14, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain reduction

    Visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to measure the pain assessment at the three months and six months follow-up.

    Six months

  • Functional mobility of the patients

    American Foot and Ankle Score (AFAS) ankle-Hindfoot scale will be used to measure the functional outcome of the patients at the three months and six months follow-up.

    Six months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Plantar fascia thickness

    Six months

Study Arms (2)

Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) group

EXPERIMENTAL

The PRP will be prepared based on the Sengodan et al, 2020 study.

Drug: Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) group

Steroid group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Steroid group will be treated with steroid injection. In this group, 2ml of Inj. Depo-Medrol 80 mg (Methylprednisolone) along with 1 ml lignocaine (0.25%) will be loaded in 5cc syringe and then the cocktail will be injected into medial calcaneal tuberosity at the most tender point using an aseptic technique as mentioned by Nishanth et.at,2018. After the procedure, participants will be advised not to involve in any kind of rigorous activity with the affected foot for at least two days and then gradually return to their regular activities. All patients will be counseled to follow up in the next visit at 3 months and 6 months. The end-line information will be again recorded at 3 months and 6 months.

Drug: Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) group

Interventions

Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) group will be intervened with PRP injection. The collection of 30 ml blood of patients into acid citrate dextrose tube under aseptic condition will be done and subjected for centrifugation at 2000 rpm (soft spin) through digital centrifuge machine speed control (REMI, R-8C PLUS). There will be three layers of blood, among them the supernatant layer and buff coat of plasma will be again subjected to centrifuge at 3000 rpm (hard spin). The upper two thirds of the tube containing platelet poor plasma will be discarded and finally, the lower one third concentrated platelet plasma superficial buffy coat will be injected into medial calcaneal tuberosity at the most tender point.

Also known as: PRP intervention
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) groupSteroid group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • The patients having the pain over the plantar aspect of foot for more than 6 weeks with tenderness on palpation over the medial calcaneal tuberosity, failure of conservative treatment with physiotherapy, splints and NSAIDs.

You may not qualify if:

  • Lumbar radiculopathy
  • Existing trauma, previous surgery or any local pathology over the foot
  • Patient on aspirin
  • Bleeding disorders with low platelet counts
  • Systemic disease like diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dev Ram Sunuwar

Kathmandu, Bagmati, +9779851147339, Nepal

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Lareau CR, Sawyer GA, Wang JH, DiGiovanni CW. Plantar and medial heel pain: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Jun;22(6):372-80. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-06-372.

  • Buchbinder R. Clinical practice. Plantar fasciitis. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2159-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp032745. No abstract available.

  • League AC. Current concepts review: plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Mar;29(3):358-66. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0358. No abstract available.

  • Davis PF, Severud E, Baxter DE. Painful heel syndrome: results of nonoperative treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Oct;15(10):531-5. doi: 10.1177/107110079401501002.

  • Healey K, Chen K. Plantar fasciitis: current diagnostic modalities and treatments. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010 Jul;27(3):369-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 May 14.

  • Acevedo JI, Beskin JL. Complications of plantar fascia rupture associated with corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Feb;19(2):91-7. doi: 10.1177/107110079801900207.

  • David JA, Sankarapandian V, Christopher PR, Chatterjee A, Macaden AS. Injected corticosteroids for treating plantar heel pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 11;6(6):CD009348. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009348.pub2.

  • Zhang JY, Fabricant PD, Ishmael CR, Wang JC, Petrigliano FA, Jones KJ. Utilization of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Musculoskeletal Injuries: An Analysis of Current Treatment Trends in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Dec 21;4(12):2325967116676241. doi: 10.1177/2325967116676241. eCollection 2016 Dec.

  • Baksh N, Hannon CP, Murawski CD, Smyth NA, Kennedy JG. Platelet-rich plasma in tendon models: a systematic review of basic science literature. Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar;29(3):596-607. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.025. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

  • Orchard J. Plantar fasciitis. BMJ. 2012 Oct 10;345:e6603. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6603. No abstract available.

  • Say F, Gurler D, Inkaya E, Bulbul M. Comparison of platelet-rich plasma and steroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(6):667-72. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2014.13.0142.

  • Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.

  • Jain K, Murphy PN, Clough TM. Platelet rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection for plantar fasciitis: A comparative study. Foot (Edinb). 2015 Dec;25(4):235-7. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 22.

  • Sharma R, Chaudhary NK, Karki M, Sunuwar DR, Singh DR, Pradhan PMS, Gyawali P, Duwal Shrestha SK, Bhandari KK. Effect of platelet-rich plasma versus steroid injection in plantar fasciitis: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Mar 7;24(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06277-1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fasciitis, Plantar

Interventions

Population Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FasciitisMusculoskeletal DiseasesFoot Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DemographyPopulation Characteristics

Study Officials

  • Rachit Sharma, MBBS, MS

    Nepal Orthopedic Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A hospital-based randomized clinical trial study will be carried out to compare the efficacy of steroid injection with PRP injection in the treatment for Plantar Fasciitis. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio, and assigned to steroid injection and PRP injection group through computer generated block randomization.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2021

First Posted

August 2, 2021

Study Start

July 25, 2021

Primary Completion

January 26, 2022

Study Completion

February 1, 2022

Last Updated

May 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations