Altered Back Geometry and Mobility Function After Backward Walking Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Effect of Forward Versus Backward Walking Training on Back Geometry and Mobility Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy: a Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of backward walking training on back geometry and mobility function in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy through a comparative analysis with forward walking training. BACKGROUND: Spinal deformities are important orthopaedic problems among children with cerebral palsy. A detailed evaluation of all these areas when the child first arrives for treatment is essential. The majority of research in children with CP is focused on assessment and treatment of upper and lower extremities. In contrast, literature on trunk control in children with CP is scarce. Although proximal trunk control is a prerequisite for improving balance and weight symmetry, there is a lack of studies that reported the role of forward and backward walking training in treating the trunk for children with CP. Therefore, the purpose of this study will investigate the role of backward walking training in addition to conventional physiotherapy program on back geometry and mobility function in children with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy. HYPOTHESES: The null hypothesis of this study could be stated as: There will be no statistically significant difference in back geometry and mobility function after adding backward walking training to conventional physical therapy program in spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy children compared with forward walking training. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do adding backward walking training to conventional physical therapy program improves back geometry and functional mobility in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2021
CompletedMay 25, 2022
May 1, 2022
3 months
June 25, 2021
May 23, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Trunk imbalance
It represented the lateral deviation of the vertebra prominence from the dimple midpoint. It is measured in millimeters.
Change from Baseline Trunk imbalance at 3 months
Lateral deviation
The root mean square (RMS) lateral deviation of the spinal midline from the line VP-DM. It is measured in millimeters
Change from Baseline Lateral deviation at 3 months
Pelvic tilt
The pelvic tilt refers to a height difference of the lumber dimples relative to a horizontal plane. It is measured in millimeters
Change from Baseline Pelvic tilt at 3 months
Surface rotation
The root mean square (RMS) value of the surface rotation on the symmetry line (in degrees).
Change from Baseline Surface rotation at 3 months
Pelvic torsion
It is the twisting of the pelvis about a transverse axis (in degrees).
Change from Baseline Pelvic torsion at 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Mobility function
Change from Baseline dynamic gait index at 3 months
Study Arms (2)
Conventional physical therapy plus forward walking
EXPERIMENTAL25 minutes of the forward walking training program It is based on methods as described by Grecco et al. (2013) The children were instructed to walk at a comfortable, self-selected speed during the first and final five minutes of the session and encouraged to increase the speed during the other 15 minutes.
Conventional physical therapy plus backward walking
EXPERIMENTAL25minutes of the backward walking training It is based on methods as described by Davis (1992) Firstly, the subject is asked to take a step backwards within the parallel bar and can support him or herself with the unaffected hand as required. The therapist provides help to move the subject's leg in the correct pattern, preventing subject from moving the leg back in full extension, when the subject can move the leg back with the correct pattern, the therapist gradually reduces the amount of assistance. Secondly, as the movement components have been practiced and the subjects has taken over actively with only slight help, the therapist facilitates walking backward within the parallel bars. Thirdly, the subject walks backwards actively away from the parallel bars. Finally, the distance and speed of walking backwards is progressively increased.
Interventions
both groups received conventional physiotherapy training program, for one hour, three sessions per week, for three successive months, based on neurodevelopmental treatment, composed of approximation of the upper and lower limbs in a regular and rhythmic manner, facilitation of righting, equilibrium and protective reactions, training of postural stability and equal weight shift especially on the affected side, stretching, strengthening exercises for upper and lower limbs and back muscles
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ranged from 5 to 7 years
- Average height around one meter or more as it is the suitable height for formetric measures
- They were able to stand alone independently and have the ability to walk both forward and backward over ground without an assistive device.
- They were able to understand and follow verbal command. They were classified as I or II by gross motor function classification system (GMFCS).
- The degree of spasticity in the involved lower extremity according to Modified Ashworth Scale ranged between grades 1, 1+ and 2.
You may not qualify if:
- Neurological or orthopedic surgery in the last 12 months, uncontrolled seizure disorder, visual, auditory or perceptual problems and who had any experience of backward training before the trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University
Giza, None Selected, 12611, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Amr A Abdel-aziem, Ph.D
Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Biomechanics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2021
First Posted
July 29, 2021
Study Start
August 1, 2021
Primary Completion
October 30, 2021
Study Completion
October 30, 2021
Last Updated
May 25, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05