A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effects and Mechanism of Action of Dysport®, Botox® and Xeomin® in the Extensor Digitorum Brevis Model in Healthy Adult Male Participants
A Phase I, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Single-centre Comparative Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamic Profile of Dysport®, Botox®, and Xeomin® in the Extensor Digitorum Brevis (EDB) Model in Healthy Adult Male Participants
2 other identifiers
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Study aimed at comparing the pharmacodynamic profile (including duration of action) of three commercialized toxins by measuring the action potential of the injected muscle (extensor digitorum brevis)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Jul 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 6, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 8, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 1, 2024
CompletedFebruary 19, 2025
February 1, 2025
8 months
July 2, 2021
May 18, 2023
February 18, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Adjusted Mean (AM) Percentage (%) of CMAP Total Amplitude at Week 28
The CMAP procedure was performed on the injected foot by a neurophysiologist. Percentage relative to baseline was calculated as (value at Week 28 \[mean of the 3 measurements\]/baseline value) multiplied by (\*) 100. The adjusted mean was obtained from a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model with Fisher scoring. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to study drug administration. Baseline value used for this analysis was the average of 6 measurements, the 3 measurements at screening and the 3 measurements at baseline.
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline in AM % of CMAP Total Amplitude at Week 40
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 40
Percentage of Participants With Recovery of CMAP Total Amplitude
At Weeks 28 and 40
Time to Onset of Action of Study Intervention
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 40
Duration of Response
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 40
Percentage of Maximal Inhibition (Maximal Effect) of CMAP Total Amplitude
Up to Week 40
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Dysport®
EXPERIMENTAL40 Units (U) Intramuscular (IM) injection at day 1.
Botox®
ACTIVE COMPARATOR16U IM at day 1.
Xeomin®
ACTIVE COMPARATOR16U IM at day 1.
Interventions
Intramuscular Injection, concentration 300 units (U)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant must be between18 to 65 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent
- Participants who are overtly healthy as determined by medical evaluation including medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, vital signs and cardiac monitoring
- A body mass index (BMI) within the range 18 and 30 kg/m2 (inclusive).
You may not qualify if:
- Any medical condition that may put the participant at risk with exposure to BoNT, including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function
- Previous treatment with botulinum toxin (BoNT) (any serotype) during the past 6 months
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of the Dysport/ Botox/ Xeomin formulation (which includes human serum albumin, lactose, sucrose) or allergy to cow's milk protein
- Use of agents that could interfere with neuromuscular transmission, including calcium channel blockers, penicillamine, aminoglycosides, lincosamides, polymixins, magnesium sulphate, anticholinesterases, succinylcholine and quinidine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ipsenlead
Study Sites (1)
Mac Research Clinical research Unit
Manchester, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Laurent Pons/Clinical Pharmacology Director
- Organization
- Ipsen Innovation
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ipsen Medical Director
Ipsen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2021
First Posted
July 21, 2021
Study Start
July 6, 2021
Primary Completion
March 16, 2022
Study Completion
June 8, 2022
Last Updated
February 19, 2025
Results First Posted
August 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share