NCT04966000

Brief Summary

Preliminary data will be collected about which individuals with spatial neglect from right hemisphere stroke (aiming vs perceptual neglect) improve with Prism Adaptation Training and if there is a particular pattern of damage in the brain that predicts both the type of neglect experienced and whether neglect is improved following Prism Adaptation Training

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 30, 2021

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 16, 2021

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2023

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 5, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 5, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 17, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

June 30, 2021

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

strokePrism Adaptation Therapyspatial neglect

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Catherine Bergego Scale

    asks the impact of neglect behavior on 20 everyday tasks using a 0-3 rating scale. Higher scores = more neglect impact. Total score is sum of item scores

    baseline before prism adaptation therapy

  • Catherine Bergego Scale

    asks the impact of neglect behavior on 20 everyday tasks using a 0-3 rating scale. Higher scores = more neglect impact. Total score is sum of item scores

    post-intervention immediately after prism adaptation therapy

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Behavioral Attention Test conventional subtests

    baseline pre-prism adaptation therapy

  • Behavioral Attention Test conventional subtests

    post-intervention immediately after prism adaptation therapy

Study Arms (1)

Prism Adaptation Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

10 sessions (60 trials each) 1x/day of Prism Adaptation Therapy

Behavioral: Prism Adaptation Therapy

Interventions

Participants wear goggles with built-in prisms (a 20-diopter lens) that shift the visual scene to the right. While wearing the googles they reach to and cross out 60 lines/circles, requiring them to learn to reach more leftward than the visual targets appear. Participants can only see the end of their movements.

Also known as: PAT
Prism Adaptation Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \) within 1 month of right hemisphere stroke
  • \) suspected of having unilateral spatial neglect
  • \) able to provide consent
  • \) likely to remain in rehabilitation for 10-12 days or willing to return to the University to complete 10 sessions of treatment and post-treatment testing
  • \) able to have an MRI
  • \) will be or has been admitted to the Craig H. Neilson Rehabilitation Hospital for rehabilitation or is able to come to the Craig H. Neilson Rehabilitation Hospital for prism adaptation therapy sessions.
  • \) age 18-90 years
  • \) able to sit in a wheelchair or other chair for 1 hour
  • \) able to point straight ahead and hold a pen with right hand

You may not qualify if:

  • \) other neurologic, medical that would interfere with ability to complete the testing or training
  • \) no uncorrected visual or hearing problems, other than hemianopsia
  • \) contraindications to MRI
  • \) unable to provide consent due to significant aphasia or cognitive impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Goedert KM, Chen P, Boston RC, Foundas AL, Barrett AM. Presence of Motor-Intentional Aiming Deficit Predicts Functional Improvement of Spatial Neglect With Prism Adaptation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Jun;28(5):483-93. doi: 10.1177/1545968313516872. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

  • Goedert KM, Chen P, Foundas AL, Barrett AM. Frontal lesions predict response to prism adaptation treatment in spatial neglect: A randomised controlled study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Jan;30(1):32-53. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1448287. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Perceptual DisordersStroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: a single group pre-post pilot study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2021

First Posted

July 16, 2021

Study Start

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion

December 5, 2024

Study Completion

December 5, 2024

Last Updated

June 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2023-09

Locations