CAS Versus Traditional Freehand Technique for Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Vascularized Fibular Flap
Computer-assisted Versus Traditional Freehand Technique for Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Vascularized Fibular Flap: A Matched-pair Study
1 other identifier
observational
153
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A total of 153 patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction by VFF were included from Jan 1999 to Dec 2019. The mandibular resection and reconstruction were performed by four experienced oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Reasons for reconstruction were oncologic, osteoradionecrosis, trauma, and osteoporosis. All the patients were followed up postoperatively for at least one year. Eighteen pairs were formed with the matched cohort consisting of a total of 36 patients who underwent primary mandibular reconstruction without additional combined flaps. The surgery-related and patient-related continuous and categorical parameters were assessed in both groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 18, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2021
CompletedJuly 21, 2021
July 1, 2021
3 months
July 7, 2021
July 15, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
operation time
operation time
within the surgery
Study Arms (2)
Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) group
Non-CAS group
Interventions
Preoperative head and neck computed tomography (CT) and lower extremity CT angiography were acquired for all patients. In the CAS group, CT images (slice thickness\<1 mm) were imported into a 3D surgical planning software (Proplan, Version 2.0/3.0 Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Virtual surgical planning was performed to determine the mandibular and fibular resection and cut margins with localization of the optimal angles for performing osteotomies. After that, surgical guides were designed utilizing a 3D designing software (3-Matic, Version 9.0-13.0, Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). The generated virtual templates were exported in Standard Tessellation Language (STL) format and printed with a professional 3D printer (Connex 350, Stratasys, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). The reconstructive plates were pre-bent on a 3D printed planned mandibular model.
Eligibility Criteria
A total of 153 patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction by VFF were included from Jan 1999 to Dec 2019.
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of head and neck cancer
- Received mandibular reconstruction
- All patients were followed up postoperatively for at least one year
You may not qualify if:
- Patients received bone graft for jaw reconstruction before mandibular reconstruction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- KU Leuvenlead
Study Sites (1)
UZ Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2021
First Posted
July 16, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2020
Primary Completion
March 1, 2021
Study Completion
April 18, 2021
Last Updated
July 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share