Study Stopped
Study temporarily suspended until funding can be secured.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Using Different Grafts and Surgical Techniques
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Patellar With Hamstring Tendon Using a Computer-assisted Versus a Conventional Surgical Technique.
1 other identifier
interventional
125
1 country
1
Brief Summary
ACL reconstruction in the Division of Orthopaedic surgery at Queen's is currently being performed arthroscopically assisted. The resultant function of the reconstructed ligament is greatly influenced by the placement of the transosseous tunnels, which are tunnels in the bones through which the grafts pass. Presently the placement of the tunnels is being judged from arthroscopically identified anatomical landmarks within the joint. The result is incidence rates of misplaced tunnels as high as 40%. Computer assisted tunnel placement would aid in the correction and reproducibility of anatomic tunnel placement. The objective of this study is to conduct a prospective, randomized trial comparing clinical and radiographic outcomes in subjects who receive either a patella or hamstring tendon graft to reconstruct a chronic tear of the anterior cruciate ligament. All subjects will be further randomized into a computer-assisted or a conventional arthroscopic surgical group to allow investigators to compare the precision and accuracy of tunnel placement between these surgical approaches. The main question under investigation is: does the increased accuracy of computer-assisted surgery make a clinical difference to the laxity of the reconstructed knee, and is the laxity further influenced by the type of tendon graft received?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2029
September 10, 2015
September 1, 2015
18.3 years
March 6, 2006
September 9, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The main outcome under investigation is knee laxity as reflected by graft tension.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Other outcomes of interest include graft isometry, position and size as well as knee pain, stiffness, function, and range of motion.
2 years
Study Arms (4)
1
NO INTERVENTIONapplying a patellar graft using conventional surgical technique.
2
NO INTERVENTIONapplying a hamstring graft using conventional surgical technique.
3
EXPERIMENTALapplying a patellar graft using a computer-assisted surgy technique.
4
EXPERIMENTALhamstring graft CAOS
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of a chronic unilateral rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament
- Aged 18-40
You may not qualify if:
- Acute injury of the ACL (interval between the injury and operation is \< 30 days).
- Other ligament tears and/or operation on the operative knee (with the exception of a previous meniscectomy).
- Injury of the contralateral knee.
- Degenerative changes of the articular cartilage (grade III or IV changes according to the Outerbrige classification system)
- Complaints of patellofemoral symptoms
- Patient is pregnant
- Inability to complete 2-year follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Davide Bardana, MD
Queen's University (faculty)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2006
First Posted
March 8, 2006
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2029
Last Updated
September 10, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09