NCT00300300

Brief Summary

ACL reconstruction in the Division of Orthopaedic surgery at Queen's is currently being performed arthroscopically assisted. The resultant function of the reconstructed ligament is greatly influenced by the placement of the transosseous tunnels, which are tunnels in the bones through which the grafts pass. Presently the placement of the tunnels is being judged from arthroscopically identified anatomical landmarks within the joint. The result is incidence rates of misplaced tunnels as high as 40%. Computer assisted tunnel placement would aid in the correction and reproducibility of anatomic tunnel placement. The objective of this study is to conduct a prospective, randomized trial comparing clinical and radiographic outcomes in subjects who receive either a patella or hamstring tendon graft to reconstruct a chronic tear of the anterior cruciate ligament. All subjects will be further randomized into a computer-assisted or a conventional arthroscopic surgical group to allow investigators to compare the precision and accuracy of tunnel placement between these surgical approaches. The main question under investigation is: does the increased accuracy of computer-assisted surgery make a clinical difference to the laxity of the reconstructed knee, and is the laxity further influenced by the type of tendon graft received?

Trial Health

50
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
125

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
32mo left

Started Sep 2009

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress86%
Sep 2009Jan 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 6, 2006

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 8, 2006

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2009

Completed
18.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2028

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2029

Last Updated

September 10, 2015

Status Verified

September 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

18.3 years

First QC Date

March 6, 2006

Last Update Submit

September 9, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

ACL computer-assisted surgery graft

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The main outcome under investigation is knee laxity as reflected by graft tension.

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Other outcomes of interest include graft isometry, position and size as well as knee pain, stiffness, function, and range of motion.

    2 years

Study Arms (4)

1

NO INTERVENTION

applying a patellar graft using conventional surgical technique.

2

NO INTERVENTION

applying a hamstring graft using conventional surgical technique.

3

EXPERIMENTAL

applying a patellar graft using a computer-assisted surgy technique.

Procedure: Computer-assisted surgery

4

EXPERIMENTAL

hamstring graft CAOS

Procedure: Computer-assisted surgery

Interventions

no description

34

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of a chronic unilateral rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament
  • Aged 18-40

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute injury of the ACL (interval between the injury and operation is \< 30 days).
  • Other ligament tears and/or operation on the operative knee (with the exception of a previous meniscectomy).
  • Injury of the contralateral knee.
  • Degenerative changes of the articular cartilage (grade III or IV changes according to the Outerbrige classification system)
  • Complaints of patellofemoral symptoms
  • Patient is pregnant
  • Inability to complete 2-year follow-up

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Surgery, Computer-Assisted

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Davide Bardana, MD

    Queen's University (faculty)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2006

First Posted

March 8, 2006

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2029

Last Updated

September 10, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-09

Locations