Study Stopped
Research facility was restructured and no longer treated subjects in the study population.
The Effect of Wound Irrigation With Irrisept on Abscess Healing (Irrisept UF Study)
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Irrisept compared to standard of care treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the form of abscesses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 2, 2022
CompletedFebruary 2, 2022
January 1, 2022
1.8 years
June 14, 2021
July 30, 2021
January 4, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of Subjects That Used Oral Antibiotics
Oral antibiotic use was used to determine if the use of pressurized irrigation with Irrisept in uncomplicated abscesses improved wound healing when compared to pressurized irrigation with SoC (normal saline).
24, 48, 72 & 96-hour visit intervals
Abscess Wound Healing Determined By Wound Improvement Score
Wound improvement assessments were used to determine if the use of pressurized irrigation with Irrisept in uncomplicated abscesses improved wound healing when compared to pressurized irrigation with SoC (normal saline). Wound improvement was assessed via a clinician's discretion, according to a 5-point Likert scale: 1 = clinically resolved, no signs of active infection; 2 = markedly improved, resolving infection and healing; 3 = improved with some remaining signs of active infection; 4 = unchanged, stable without signs of worsening clinical infection and; 5 = worsening conditions. The results are shown using a chi-squared test, as an average Likert score compared between the 2 arms.
Abscess wound healing, assessed by wound improvement, was reviewed at the 48-hour visit.
Abscess Wound Healing Determined By Exudation Score
Exudation assessments were used to determine if the use of pressurized irrigation with Irrisept in uncomplicated abscesses improved wound healing when compared to pressurized irrigation with SoC (normal saline). Exudation was assessed via a clinician's discretion, according to a 5-point Likert scale: 1 = none; 2 = scant; 3 = minimal; 4 = moderate and; 5 = copious. The results are shown using a chi-squared test to compare the means at baseline and 48-hours. A two-tailed t-test was conducted for the mean improvement.
Abscess wound healing, assessed by exudation, was reviewed at baseline and the 48-hour visit.
Abscess Wound Healing Determined By Pain Score
Pain assessments were used to determine if the use of pressurized irrigation with Irrisept in uncomplicated abscesses improved wound healing when compared to pressurized irrigation with SoC (normal saline). Pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The scale was measured in centimeters (cm) which ranged between 0 cm ("no pain" at the far left) to 9.5 cm ("most severe pain" at the far right). Subjects marked their pain rating on the scale with an "X". The distance from the beginning of the scale (far left) to the "X" was measured in cm. The mean VAS score was assessed at baseline and at the 48-hour follow-up visit. The overall mean improvement was compared between the 2 arms using two-tailed t-tests.
Abscess wound healing, assessed by pain, was reviewed at baseline and the 48-hour visit.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Oral Antibiotic Use Required, Determined By Erythema Area Size
The need for oral antibiotics, assessed by erythema, was reviewed at baseline and the 48-hour visit.
Oral Antibiotic Use Required, Determined By Induration (Abscess Area Size)
48-hours after baseline
Oral Antibiotic Use Required Due To Warmth
The need for oral antibiotics, assessed by warmth, was reviewed at baseline and the 48-hour visit.
Oral Antibiotic Use Required Due To Fluctuance
The need for oral antibiotics, assessed by fluctuance, was reviewed at baseline and the 48-hour visit.
Other Outcomes (1)
Oral Antibiotic Use Required Due To Results of MRSA/Wound Culture
0 days
Study Arms (2)
Standard of Care (SoC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor subjects randomized to the control group, Standard of Care (SoC), which was normal saline, was used.
Irrisept
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor subjects randomized to the investigational group, Irrisept was used.
Interventions
SoC consisted of irrigation with normal saline, using the same proprietary abscess irrigation tip as the Irrisept arm. SoC was used at the initial visit and at each subsequent 48-hour visit interval (up to 96 hours) until abscess healing.
Irrisept is a manual, self-contained irrigation device capable of producing 7-8 psi of pressure for effective wound cleansing and irrigation. Irrisept contents include the Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) solution, a 450 mL bottle, and Irriprobe applicator or an abscess irrigation tip. The bottle design allows users to control the pressure of the solution through manual bottle compression. The device had an option for use with an Irriprobe applicator or an abscess irrigation tip. Irrisept was used at the initial visit and at each subsequent 48-hour visit interval (up to 96 hours) until abscess healing.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Immunocompetent individuals, 12 years of age or older with an uncomplicated abscess
- Uncomplicated abscess is defined as ≤8 cm of induration (defined as firmness to touch) at the greatest diameter.
- ≤4 cm of surrounding erythema (surrounding redness).
- Defined area of central fluctuance may or may not be present.
- Patient must be able to answer questions.
- Patient must be medically stable as defined by the emergency department physician.
- Patient must participate voluntarily in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving antibiotics or received antibiotics within the last 72 hours.
- Evidence of systemic infection (fever, aches, chills, nausea).
- Requires admission to the hospital for infection or for any other reason(s).
- Abscess caused by a human or animal bite.
- Prior history of hypersensitivity or allergy to Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG).
- Immunodeficiency (examples: HIV positive, Crohn's disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, Addison's disease, psoriasis, splenectomy, leukemia, cancer (on chemotherapy)).
- Currently on any immune-modifying medication (examples - prednisone, antivirals).
- History of chronic skin infection (3 or more in the past year).
- Chronic medical problem (for example, end-stage heart, liver, kidney or lung disease, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, history of organ transplant).
- Mental illness, including but not limited to, substance abuse, dementia, schizophrenia or mentally handicapped or challenged.
- Incarcerated.
- Patient is pregnant or thinks she may be pregnant.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Florida, Shands Emergency Department
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Richard Petrik, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor
- Organization
- University of Florida Shands Emergency Department
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard Petrik, MD
University of Florida/Shands Emergency Department
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2021
First Posted
July 12, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2011
Study Completion
November 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 2, 2022
Results First Posted
February 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share