NCT04957732

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Irrisept compared to standard of care treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the form of abscesses.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2011

Completed
9.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 14, 2021

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 12, 2021

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 2, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 2, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

June 14, 2021

Results QC Date

July 30, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 4, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Wound Irrigation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Number of Subjects That Used Oral Antibiotics

    Oral antibiotic use was used to determine if the use of pressurized irrigation with Irrisept in uncomplicated abscesses improved wound healing when compared to pressurized irrigation with SoC (normal saline).

    24, 48, 72 & 96-hour visit intervals

  • Abscess Wound Healing Determined By Wound Improvement Score

    Wound improvement assessments were used to determine if the use of pressurized irrigation with Irrisept in uncomplicated abscesses improved wound healing when compared to pressurized irrigation with SoC (normal saline). Wound improvement was assessed via a clinician's discretion, according to a 5-point Likert scale: 1 = clinically resolved, no signs of active infection; 2 = markedly improved, resolving infection and healing; 3 = improved with some remaining signs of active infection; 4 = unchanged, stable without signs of worsening clinical infection and; 5 = worsening conditions. The results are shown using a chi-squared test, as an average Likert score compared between the 2 arms.

    Abscess wound healing, assessed by wound improvement, was reviewed at the 48-hour visit.

  • Abscess Wound Healing Determined By Exudation Score

    Exudation assessments were used to determine if the use of pressurized irrigation with Irrisept in uncomplicated abscesses improved wound healing when compared to pressurized irrigation with SoC (normal saline). Exudation was assessed via a clinician's discretion, according to a 5-point Likert scale: 1 = none; 2 = scant; 3 = minimal; 4 = moderate and; 5 = copious. The results are shown using a chi-squared test to compare the means at baseline and 48-hours. A two-tailed t-test was conducted for the mean improvement.

    Abscess wound healing, assessed by exudation, was reviewed at baseline and the 48-hour visit.

  • Abscess Wound Healing Determined By Pain Score

    Pain assessments were used to determine if the use of pressurized irrigation with Irrisept in uncomplicated abscesses improved wound healing when compared to pressurized irrigation with SoC (normal saline). Pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The scale was measured in centimeters (cm) which ranged between 0 cm ("no pain" at the far left) to 9.5 cm ("most severe pain" at the far right). Subjects marked their pain rating on the scale with an "X". The distance from the beginning of the scale (far left) to the "X" was measured in cm. The mean VAS score was assessed at baseline and at the 48-hour follow-up visit. The overall mean improvement was compared between the 2 arms using two-tailed t-tests.

    Abscess wound healing, assessed by pain, was reviewed at baseline and the 48-hour visit.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Oral Antibiotic Use Required, Determined By Erythema Area Size

    The need for oral antibiotics, assessed by erythema, was reviewed at baseline and the 48-hour visit.

  • Oral Antibiotic Use Required, Determined By Induration (Abscess Area Size)

    48-hours after baseline

  • Oral Antibiotic Use Required Due To Warmth

    The need for oral antibiotics, assessed by warmth, was reviewed at baseline and the 48-hour visit.

  • Oral Antibiotic Use Required Due To Fluctuance

    The need for oral antibiotics, assessed by fluctuance, was reviewed at baseline and the 48-hour visit.

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Oral Antibiotic Use Required Due To Results of MRSA/Wound Culture

    0 days

Study Arms (2)

Standard of Care (SoC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For subjects randomized to the control group, Standard of Care (SoC), which was normal saline, was used.

Device: Standard of Care (SoC)

Irrisept

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For subjects randomized to the investigational group, Irrisept was used.

Device: Irrisept Delivery System

Interventions

SoC consisted of irrigation with normal saline, using the same proprietary abscess irrigation tip as the Irrisept arm. SoC was used at the initial visit and at each subsequent 48-hour visit interval (up to 96 hours) until abscess healing.

Standard of Care (SoC)

Irrisept is a manual, self-contained irrigation device capable of producing 7-8 psi of pressure for effective wound cleansing and irrigation. Irrisept contents include the Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) solution, a 450 mL bottle, and Irriprobe applicator or an abscess irrigation tip. The bottle design allows users to control the pressure of the solution through manual bottle compression. The device had an option for use with an Irriprobe applicator or an abscess irrigation tip. Irrisept was used at the initial visit and at each subsequent 48-hour visit interval (up to 96 hours) until abscess healing.

Also known as: Irrisept
Irrisept

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Immunocompetent individuals, 12 years of age or older with an uncomplicated abscess
  • Uncomplicated abscess is defined as ≤8 cm of induration (defined as firmness to touch) at the greatest diameter.
  • ≤4 cm of surrounding erythema (surrounding redness).
  • Defined area of central fluctuance may or may not be present.
  • Patient must be able to answer questions.
  • Patient must be medically stable as defined by the emergency department physician.
  • Patient must participate voluntarily in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently receiving antibiotics or received antibiotics within the last 72 hours.
  • Evidence of systemic infection (fever, aches, chills, nausea).
  • Requires admission to the hospital for infection or for any other reason(s).
  • Abscess caused by a human or animal bite.
  • Prior history of hypersensitivity or allergy to Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG).
  • Immunodeficiency (examples: HIV positive, Crohn's disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, Addison's disease, psoriasis, splenectomy, leukemia, cancer (on chemotherapy)).
  • Currently on any immune-modifying medication (examples - prednisone, antivirals).
  • History of chronic skin infection (3 or more in the past year).
  • Chronic medical problem (for example, end-stage heart, liver, kidney or lung disease, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, history of organ transplant).
  • Mental illness, including but not limited to, substance abuse, dementia, schizophrenia or mentally handicapped or challenged.
  • Incarcerated.
  • Patient is pregnant or thinks she may be pregnant.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Florida, Shands Emergency Department

Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Abscess

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SuppurationInfectionsInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Richard Petrik, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor
Organization
University of Florida Shands Emergency Department

Study Officials

  • Richard Petrik, MD

    University of Florida/Shands Emergency Department

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The randomization methodology was controlled by the site.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2021

First Posted

July 12, 2021

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

November 1, 2011

Study Completion

November 1, 2011

Last Updated

February 2, 2022

Results First Posted

February 2, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations