Study Stopped
Recruitment of this population in the hospital setting not practical.
Antibiotic Therapy After Incision and Drainage for Abscess
The Use of Adjuvant Antibiotic Therapy After Incision and Drainage for Pediatric Abscess: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Skin abscesses are a growing problem in the general pediatric population around the world. While the standard treatment for an abscess/boil is incision and drainage, many physicians also prescribe antibiotics, despite the lack of evidence that antibiotics are necessary to help the wound heal. The purpose of this research study is to determine whether antibiotics are necessary after incision and drainage of a skin abscess in children. This is an important question because medical evidence has shown that using antibiotics when they are not needed has contributed to the increase of bacterial antibiotic resistance. In fact, several of the antibiotics that successfully killed Staph bacteria several years ago are now no longer effective because of antibiotic resistance. Now resistant forms of Staph bacteria, called "Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staph Aureus" (CA-MRSA), account for 50-85% of all pediatric skin abscesses. If antibiotics are not necessary then withholding them when appropriate may help slow the progression of antibiotic-resistant Staph infections. Objective(s) and Hypothesis(es): The investigators believe that antibiotics are no better than placebo at achieving a cure after drainage of an abscess in a child. The objective of this study is to answer the question: Do antibiotics after abscess drainage result in a better chance of cure than placebo? Potential Impact: If abscess drainage alone is shown to be as effective as drainage followed by antibiotics, then the routine use of antibiotics for this problem could be avoided. This would help limit the increasing antibiotic resistance of bacteria (especially CA-MRSA) in communities around the world. A well-designed study may provide the evidence to change the way children are treated for abscesses in a future where antibiotic resistant bacteria will be even more of a public health challenge.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started May 2009
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 12, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2011
CompletedNovember 6, 2017
December 1, 2014
2 years
May 11, 2009
November 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Resolution of abscess
5-7 days
Study Arms (2)
Drainage and placebo
EXPERIMENTALIncision and drainage with placebo.
Drainage with TMP/SX
ACTIVE COMPARATORDrainage with Bactrim
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any child (age 6 months-18 years old) that:
- does not meet criteria for hospitalization and
- has only one localized abscess (\>/= 2 cm of erythema and induration), which is clinically judged to be amenable to incision and drainage. (i.e., on clinical exam their is fluctuance, erythema, induration, and/or purulent drainage)
- has an abscess that is ± 7 days from onset, who requires surgical incision and drainage for a skin and soft-tissue abscess
You may not qualify if:
- children \< 6 months of age
- children who require inpatient hospitalization - children with a medical condition in which adjuvant antibiotic therapy would be accepted standard of practice (i.e., history of neutropenia, cardiac surgery, indwelling prosthesis)
- children with a previously diagnosed immunodeficiency (HIV, Chronic Granulomatous Disease, Job's syndrome, chronic steroid use)
- children hospitalized within 2 months of presentation (due to higher rate of nosocomial MRSA colonization)
- abcesses located on the head or neck
- children with history of a sulfa allergy
- abscesses caused by animal bite wounds
- children with Diabetes Mellitus
- abscesses arising from tattooing
- abscesses arising from vaccination sites
- pregnant females
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Pranikoff, M.D.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2009
First Posted
May 12, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2011
Last Updated
November 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2014-12