Assessing the Impact of the NeuroCatch Platform 2 Stimulus Tone Volume
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The NeuroCatch Platform 2 (NCP2), an investigational medical device system developed by NeuroCatch Inc., consists of software and hardware that captures brain health information. The platform intends to provide a quick, portable and easy to use solution for the acquisition, display, analysis, storage, reporting and management of electroencephalograph (EEG) and event-related potential (ERP; brain response to a stimulus) information. The NCP2 uses two types of tones to elicit N100 and P300 ERPs, along with two types of words to elicit N400 ERPs. The objective of this study is to determine if changing the volume of the standard tone has an effect on the amplitudes and latencies of the ERPs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 12, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedMarch 24, 2022
March 1, 2022
2 months
June 30, 2021
March 22, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Difference in amplitude of the N100 ERP
Amplitude (response size) will be measured in microvolts. The statistic being used to measure the difference in amplitude between the two Tone types will be a full-factorial repeated measures analysis of variance (Factors: Tone type, Session number, Run number)
1 week (6-8 days)
Difference in latency of the N100 ERP
Latency (response time) will be measured in microseconds. The statistic being used to measure the difference in amplitude between the two Tone types will be a full-factorial repeated measures analysis of variance (Factors: Tone type, Session number, Run number)
1 week (6-8 days)
Difference in amplitude of the P300 ERP
Amplitude (response size) will be measured in microvolts. The statistic being used to measure the difference in amplitude between the two Tone types will be a full-factorial repeated measures analysis of variance (Factors: Tone type, Session number, Run number)
1 week (6-8 days)
Difference in latency of the P300 ERP
Latency (response time) will be measured in microseconds. The statistic being used to measure the difference in amplitude between the two Tone types will be a full-factorial repeated measures analysis of variance (Factors: Tone type, Session number, Run number)
1 week (6-8 days)
Difference in amplitude of the N400 ERP
Amplitude (response size) will be measured in microvolts. The statistic being used to measure the difference in amplitude between the two Tone types will be a full-factorial repeated measures analysis of variance (Factors: Tone type, Session number, Run number)
1 week (6-8 days)
Difference in latency of the N400 ERP
Latency (response time) will be measured in microseconds. The statistic being used to measure the difference in amplitude between the two Tone types will be a full-factorial repeated measures analysis of variance (Factors: Tone type, Session number, Run number)
1 week (6-8 days)
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Repeatability of the N100 Amplitude for Tone A
1 week (6-8 days)
Repeatability of the N100 Amplitude for Tone B
1 week (6-8 days)
Repeatability of the N100 Latency for Tone A
1 week (6-8 days)
Repeatability of the N100 Latency for Tone B
1 week (6-8 days)
Repeatability of the P300 Amplitude for Tone A
1 week (6-8 days)
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Tone A
ACTIVE COMPARATORTone A uses an 80dB standard tone
Tone B
EXPERIMENTALTone B uses a 93dB standard tone
Interventions
To elicit the ERP components of interest in this study (N100, P300, N400), proprietary auditory stimulus sequences will be administered using the NeuroCatch Platform 2, an investigational medical device. Each sequence consists of tones and word pairs to elicit the various components of interest. The NeuroCatch Platform 2 consists of a computerized acquisition software which presents the stimulus, acquires the data and presents the amplitude and latency values of the ERP components (N100, N400, P300)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any sex, at least 19 years of age or older
- Able to understand the informed consent form, study procedures and willing to participate in study
- Able to remain seated and focused for 7 minutes
- In good health with no history of clinically relevant neurological illness or injury in the last 5 years
You may not qualify if:
- Requires the use of hearing aids or a cochlear implant, diagnosed with tinnitus that is currently active, or has temporary damage to hearing (e.g. punctured ear drum).
- Implanted pacemaker or implanted electrical stimulators
- Metal or plastic implants in the skull, excluding dental/facial implants.
- Exposed to an investigational drug or device 30 days prior to start in this study, or concurrent or planned use of investigational drug or device while enrolled in this study
- Not proficient in English language
- Diagnosed epilepsy or history of seizures
- If female and of child-bearing potential: pregnant, suspected or planning to become pregnant or breast-feeding
- Unhealthy scalp (apparent open wounds and/or bruised or weakened skin)
- Allergy to EEG gel or history of contact dermatitis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NeuroCatch Inc.lead
Study Sites (1)
HealthTech Connex Centre for Neurology Studies
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6, Canada
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Bimal Lakhani, PhD
NeuroCatch Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants are not informed the order or type (standard Tone A, standard Tone B) of the sequences
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2021
First Posted
July 9, 2021
Study Start
July 12, 2021
Primary Completion
August 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
March 24, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03