Determining Optimal Cuff Volume in Pediatric Patients
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background and Aim: Cuffed endotracheal tubes with appropriate size, good cuff design and cuff pressure monitoring in pediatric patients can be used safely without increasing airway morbidity. Inflating the endotracheal tube cuff with more than normal volume may lead to decreased capillary blood flow and mucosal damage, while inflating the endotracheal tube cuff with less than normal volume may lead to an increase in the risk of inadequate ventilation and pulmonary aspiration. In this study, we aimed to determine an optimal cuff inflation volume to achieve safe cuff pressure (20-25 cm H2O) in cuffed endotracheal tubes with an inner diameter of 4.5, 5.0, 5.5 mm, which are commonly used in pediatric anesthesia clinical practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2021
CompletedFebruary 16, 2022
February 1, 2022
3 months
June 28, 2021
February 15, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Optimal intracuff volume
To obtain the minimum and optimal cuff volume that will provide adequate ventilation and protect from pulmonary aspiration in pediatric patients who is intubated with cuffed endotracheal tubes inner diameter of 4.5, 5.0, 5.5 mm.
during surgery
Formula for optimal cuff volume.
We would like to create a formula to calculate the estimated cuff volume that should be inflated within the safe cuff pressure range for each patient intubated with an ETT ID number 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5.
15 minute
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Formula for subglottic transverse tracheal diameter
15 minute
Postoperative complications
1 hour
Study Arms (3)
Group I (The patients intubated with cuffed ETT of ID number 4.5)
Groups are classified according to endotracheal tube ID numbers. In this group we aimed to determine the optimal cuff volume that ensures airway safety in pediatric patients intubated with a 4.5 size internal diameter (ID) endotracheal cuff tube.
Group II (The patients intubated with cuffed ETT of ID number 5.0)
Groups are classified according to endotracheal tube ID numbers. In this group we aimed to determine the optimal cuff volume that ensures airway safety in pediatric patients intubated with a 5.0 size internal diameter (ID) endotracheal cuff tube.
Group III (The patients intubated with cuffed ETT of ID number 5.5)
Groups are classified according to endotracheal tube ID numbers. In this group we aimed to determine the optimal cuff volume that ensures airway safety in pediatric patients intubated with a 5.5 size internal diameter (ID) endotracheal cuff tube.
Interventions
Groups are classified according to endotracheal tube ID numbers. Inflating the endotracheal tube cuff with more than normal volume leads to decreased capillary blood flow and mucosal damage, while inflating the endotracheal tube cuff with less than normal volume leads to insufficient ventilation of the patient and an increase in the risk of pulmonary aspiration. The cuff pressure safety range is recommended between 20-30 cmH2O to prevent gas leakage and the risk of aspiration. We aimed to determine the optimal cuff volume that ensures airway safety in pediatric patients intubated with a 4.5 size inner diameter (ID) endotracheal cuff tube. Choosing the appropriate tube for endotracheal intubation is of great importance, especially in children. In our study, the transverse diameter of the subglottic airway will be measured by USG for the selection of the appropriate ETT to be used for each patient (the formulas for the selection of ETT in the literature will be used)
Groups are classified according to endotracheal tube ID numbers. Inflating the endotracheal tube cuff with more than normal volume leads to decreased capillary blood flow and mucosal damage, while inflating the endotracheal tube cuff with less than normal volume leads to insufficient ventilation of the patient and an increase in the risk of pulmonary aspiration. The cuff pressure safety range is recommended between 20-30 cmH2O to prevent gas leakage and the risk of aspiration. We aimed to determine the optimal cuff volume that ensures airway safety in pediatric patients intubated with a 5.0 size inner diameter (ID) endotracheal cuff tube. Choosing the appropriate tube for endotracheal intubation is of great importance, especially in children. In our study, the transverse diameter of the subglottic airway will be measured by USG for the selection of the appropriate ETT to be used for each patient (the formulas for the selection of ETT in the literature will be used)
Groups are classified according to endotracheal tube ID numbers. Inflating the endotracheal tube cuff with more than normal volume leads to decreased capillary blood flow and mucosal damage, while inflating the endotracheal tube cuff with less than normal volume leads to insufficient ventilation of the patient and an increase in the risk of pulmonary aspiration. The cuff pressure safety range is recommended between 20-30 cmH2O to prevent gas leakage and the risk of aspiration. We aimed to determine the optimal cuff volume that ensures airway safety in pediatric patients intubated with a 5.5 size inner diameter (ID) endotracheal cuff tube. Choosing the appropriate tube for endotracheal intubation is of great importance, especially in children. In our study, the transverse diameter of the subglottic airway will be measured by USG for the selection of the appropriate ETT to be used for each patient (the formulas for the selection of ETT in the literature will be used)
Eligibility Criteria
Pediatric patients younger than 18 yr old who will be operated in our hospital and intubated with cuffed tubes numbered 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5 under general anesthesia
You may qualify if:
- Pediatric patients younger than 18 yr old who will be operated in our hospital and intubated with cuffed tubes numbered 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5 under general anesthesia are included in this study.
You may not qualify if:
- ASA physical status score of III and IV,
- Tracheostomy, airway obstruction or other airway anatomical abnormalities,
- Difficult intubation prediction,
- History of airway hyperreactivity or bronchial asthma,
- Body mass index above the 85th percentile and below the 5th percentile,
- Patients whose parents were unable to read, understand and sign the consent form or whose parents did not want to sign the consent form will not included in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara City Hospital
Ankara, Çankaya, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Gunes K, Sever F, Ozmert S. Determining optimal cuff volume for cuffed endotracheal tubes commonly used in pediatric patients: A prospective observational study. Saudi Med J. 2024 Feb;45(2):147-153. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.2.20230578.
PMID: 38309733DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kahir Güneş
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sengül Özmert
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Feyza Sever
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Specialist physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2021
First Posted
July 1, 2021
Study Start
July 10, 2021
Primary Completion
October 1, 2021
Study Completion
October 1, 2021
Last Updated
February 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02