Efficacy and Safety of Non Invasive Vagal Stimulation to Prevent Chemotherapy-induced Nausea
SILENCE
1 other identifier
interventional
338
1 country
8
Brief Summary
Despite pharmaceutical innovations, chemotherapy induced nausea is frequent and largely participating to alter our patients quality of life. Non invasive vagal stimulation is approved in other health issues, for example in headache or gastroparesis, with a reported benefit on nausea. This study aims to analyse if a non invasive vagal stimulation could better prevent chemotherapy induced nausea, in addition to standard treatment, in breast cancer patients treated with cyclophosphamide and anthracycline.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Jun 2022
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 24, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedMay 11, 2023
May 1, 2023
1.6 years
June 3, 2021
May 9, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of patients with significant nausea after the first chemotherapy cycle
Nausea severity is graded daily from Day 1 (day of chemotherapy) to Day 5, using a numeric scale from 0 to 10. It is a patient reported outcome, patients using a diary. Significant nausea is a score of 2 or more.
2 to 3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Percentage of patients with significant nausea after the second and the third chemotherapy cycle.
7 to 12 weeks
Percentage of patients that did not vomit or use rescue emesis medication, from the first cycle of chemotherapy to day 5 after the third chemotherapy cycle.
7 to 12 weeks
Percentage of non planned visit to emergency care unit or general practioner or oncologist due to emesis, measured for the three first chemotherapy cycles.
7 to 12 weeks
Percentage of non anticipated hydratation with IV fluids measured for the three first chemotherapy cycles.
7 to 12 weeks
Percentage of hospitalisations for emesis measured for the three first chemotherapy cycles.
7 to 12 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
intervention
EXPERIMENTALstandard anti emetic treatment use of non invasive vagal stimulation twice a day from the day before chemotherapy till 4 days after, with a transcutaneous auricular device. This stimulation is to be done for the three first cycles of chemotherapy.
control
SHAM COMPARATORstandard anti emetic treatment use of non invasive vagal stimulation twice a day from the day before chemotherapy till 4 days after, with a transcutaneous auricular sham device. This "stimulation" is to be done for the three first cycles of chemotherapy.
Interventions
Stimulation twice a day, beginning the day before until the fourth day after chemotherapy, for the three first chemotherapy cycles
Standard anti emetic treatments to prevent emesis due to chemotherapy
Stimulation twice a day, beginning the day before until the fourth day after chemotherapy, for the three first chemotherapy cycles, with a sham device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status 0 to 2
- patient with breast cancer planned to receive Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide chemotherapy
- informed consent
- compliance expected
- social security affiliation
You may not qualify if:
- Central nervous system metastasis
- Daily alcohol intake
- Prior chemotherapy
- Cardiac arrythmia, severe heart failure
- Device for sleep apnea
- History of arterial or venous thrombosis, or thrombophlebitis
- Vagotomy
- Vagal stimulation ongoing
- Skin disease on the stimulation zone
- Cochlear implant next to the stimulation zone
- Unable to use the vagal stimulation device due to left ear unusual shape
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women of childbearing age without effective contraception
- Documented allergy or contraindication to one of the antiemesis drugs required in the study
- Protected adults (individuals under guardianship by court order)
- Unable to read or write
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
CH BLOIS
Blois, France
Chru Morvan
Brest, France
CORT37
Chambray-lès-Tours, France
Ch Chateauroux
Châteauroux, France
Clinique Victor Hugo
Le Mans, France
Ch Orleans
Orléans, France
Ch Chinon
Saint-Benoît-la-Forêt, France
CHRU Bretonneau
Tours, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- sham
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2021
First Posted
June 24, 2021
Study Start
June 24, 2022
Primary Completion
February 15, 2024
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05