Rehabkompassen® - a Patient-centered Digital Follow-up Tool in the Post-stroke Continuum of Care
Rehabkompassen® - a Novel Digital Tool for Facilitating Patient-tailored Rehabilitation in the Post-acute Continuum of Care After Stroke - A Multicenter Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
1,106
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stroke is a leading cause of disability and with a heavy burden for the society. Despite the demands from 'Socialstyrelsen' of improving post-acute care, an effective structured follow-up to promote a patient-tailored rehabilitation remains largely lacking in the current stroke care. The overall aim of this study is to find a cost-effective solution to facilitate patient-tailored rehabilitation that improves daily and social activities and health-related quality of life for persons discharged from the acute care after stroke. We have recently developed a novel digital graphic tool, Rehabkompassen®, which based on patient-reported outcome measurements captures the patient's complex health status after stroke. Here, this tool will be used in a parallel, open-label, 2-arm prospective and multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial between 2022-2026. All participants (n = 1106) will be randomized according to permuted block design; and receive a usual care without (control group, n = 553) or with (intervention group, n = 553) Rehabkompassen®, within 3-month after stroke. The effectiveness of the tool on daily and social activities, quality of life and its health-economic effects will be compared at 12-month follow-up post stroke. We hypothesize that the digital tool Rehabkompassen® will provide a patient-tailored rehabilitation that improves recovery, independence, and quality of life among people with stroke in a cost-effective way.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Aug 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
July 9, 2025
June 1, 2025
7.3 years
November 11, 2020
July 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Daily activities
The simplified modified Rankin Scale questionnaire (smRSq) will be used to measure daily activities and functional status. The smRSq is based on the yes/no responses to five questions, which in turn results an ordinal data of seven categories (0-6) of the modified Rankin Scale. A favorable outcome will be defined as mRS score of 0-2 (no symptoms to independent but with minor disability). A poor outcome will be defined as mRS score of 3-5 (disability but able to walk to bed-bound and in need of full nursing care) or 6 (death).
12 months follow-up after stroke
Social activities
Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS)-participation (SIS-p) will be used to measure social activities. SIS-p is the dominant problem among persons after stroke reported in previous Swedish stroke RCTs; but not covered by smRSq. The SIS-p score ranges from 0-100 and the higher the score the less impact of stroke.
12 months follow-up after stroke
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Health-related quality of life
12 months follow-up after stroke
Stroke impacts
12 months follow-up after stroke
Health-economic evaluation
12 months follow-up after stroke
Clinicians' usability
3 months follow-up after stroke
End-users' experiences and feedback
3 months follow-up after stroke
Study Arms (2)
Intervention i.e. with Rehabkompassen®
EXPERIMENTALThe participants will use the digital graphic Rehabkompassen® at follow-up.
Control exposure i.e. without Rehabkompassen®
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants will use Post-Stroke Checklist at follow-up as recommended by "Socialstyrelsen".
Interventions
Rehabkompassen® is a patient-centered digital graphic tool for capturing the patient's rehabilitation needs in the follow-up after stroke.
Post-Stroke Checklist consists of eleven questions concerning common and treatable post-stroke problems affecting quality of life.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 years or older.
- With a stroke diagnosis
- Time since stroke onset:
- a) For the big RCT group, Individuals must be within the first 4 months after stroke, starting from Day 1 after the occurrence of the stroke.
- b) For primary care group, Individuals 3 months after stroke
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to answer the evaluation questions.
- Unable to see the Rehabkompassen®graph.
- Not using BankID, an e-identification tool commonly used in Sweden.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Umeå Universitylead
- The Swedish Research Councilcollaborator
- Forte: Swedish research council for health, working life and welfarecollaborator
- Swedish Heart Lung Foundationcollaborator
- Vinnovacollaborator
- Strokeförbundetcollaborator
- Västerbotten County Council, Swedencollaborator
- Göteborg Universitycollaborator
- Vastra Gotaland Regioncollaborator
- Uppsala Universitycollaborator
- Uppsala County Council, Swedencollaborator
- Karolinska Institutetcollaborator
- Region Stockholmcollaborator
- Västmanland County Council, Swedencollaborator
- Värmland County Council, Swedencollaborator
- Sormland County Council, Swedencollaborator
- Region Skanecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Umeå University Hospital
Umeå, 90737, Sweden
Related Publications (13)
Hu X, Wester P, Stibrant Sunnerhaagen K. [Evidence-based methods in the clinical practice in updated Swedish national stroke guidelines]. Lakartidningen. 2018 Dec 17;115:FDIX. Swedish.
PMID: 30561751BACKGROUNDHudon C, Fortin M, Haggerty JL, Lambert M, Poitras ME. Measuring patients' perceptions of patient-centered care: a systematic review of tools for family medicine. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):155-64. doi: 10.1370/afm.1226.
PMID: 21403143BACKGROUNDMagaard G, Wester P, Levi R, Lindvall P, Gustafsson E, Nazemroaya Sedeh A, Lonnqvist M, Berggren S, Nyman K, Hu X. Identifying Unmet Rehabilitation Needs in Patients After Stroke With a Graphic Rehab-CompassTM. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Nov;27(11):3224-3235. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
PMID: 30097401BACKGROUNDDevlin NJ, Brooks R. EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Apr;15(2):127-137. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0310-5.
PMID: 28194657BACKGROUNDCopas AJ, Lewis JJ, Thompson JA, Davey C, Baio G, Hargreaves JR. Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches. Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:352. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0842-7.
PMID: 26279154BACKGROUNDHargreaves JR, Copas AJ, Beard E, Osrin D, Lewis JJ, Davey C, Thompson JA, Baio G, Fielding KL, Prost A. Five questions to consider before conducting a stepped wedge trial. Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:350. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0841-8.
PMID: 26279013BACKGROUNDEFFECTS Trial Collaboration. Safety and efficacy of fluoxetine on functional recovery after acute stroke (EFFECTS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Aug;19(8):661-669. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30219-2.
PMID: 32702335BACKGROUNDWhite IR, Horton NJ, Carpenter J, Pocock SJ. Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data. BMJ. 2011 Feb 7;342:d40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d40.
PMID: 21300711BACKGROUNDOptimising Analysis of Stroke Trials (OAST) Collaboration; Bath PM, Gray LJ, Collier T, Pocock S, Carpenter J. Can we improve the statistical analysis of stroke trials? Statistical reanalysis of functional outcomes in stroke trials. Stroke. 2007 Jun;38(6):1911-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.474080. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
PMID: 17463316BACKGROUNDSavitz SI, Lew R, Bluhmki E, Hacke W, Fisher M. Shift analysis versus dichotomization of the modified Rankin scale outcome scores in the NINDS and ECASS-II trials. Stroke. 2007 Dec;38(12):3205-12. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.489351. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
PMID: 17975102BACKGROUNDHu X, Jonzen K, Karlsson M, Lindahl OA. Assessments of a novel digital follow-up tool Rehabkompassen(R) to identify rehabilitation needs among stroke patients in an outpatient setting. Digit Health. 2022 Jun 3;8:20552076221104662. doi: 10.1177/20552076221104662. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
PMID: 35677783BACKGROUNDHu X, Jonzen K, Lindahl OA, Karlsson M, Norstrom F, Lundstrom E, Sunnerhagen KS. Digital Graphic Follow-up Tool (Rehabkompassen) for Identifying Rehabilitation Needs Among People After Stroke: Randomized Clinical Feasibility Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jul 29;9(3):e38704. doi: 10.2196/38704.
PMID: 35904867BACKGROUNDHu X, Liv P, Lundstrom E, Norstrom F, Lindahl O, Borg K, Sunnerhagen KS. Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicentre, pragmatic trial with Rehabkompassen(R)-a digital structured follow-up tool for facilitating patient-tailored rehabilitation in persons after stroke. Trials. 2023 Oct 6;24(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07673-7.
PMID: 37803460DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiaolei Hu, MD PhD
Umeå University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2020
First Posted
June 7, 2021
Study Start
August 26, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06