NCT04915027

Brief Summary

Stroke is a leading cause of disability and with a heavy burden for the society. Despite the demands from 'Socialstyrelsen' of improving post-acute care, an effective structured follow-up to promote a patient-tailored rehabilitation remains largely lacking in the current stroke care. The overall aim of this study is to find a cost-effective solution to facilitate patient-tailored rehabilitation that improves daily and social activities and health-related quality of life for persons discharged from the acute care after stroke. We have recently developed a novel digital graphic tool, Rehabkompassen®, which based on patient-reported outcome measurements captures the patient's complex health status after stroke. Here, this tool will be used in a parallel, open-label, 2-arm prospective and multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial between 2022-2026. All participants (n = 1106) will be randomized according to permuted block design; and receive a usual care without (control group, n = 553) or with (intervention group, n = 553) Rehabkompassen®, within 3-month after stroke. The effectiveness of the tool on daily and social activities, quality of life and its health-economic effects will be compared at 12-month follow-up post stroke. We hypothesize that the digital tool Rehabkompassen® will provide a patient-tailored rehabilitation that improves recovery, independence, and quality of life among people with stroke in a cost-effective way.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,106

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
19mo left

Started Aug 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress78%
Aug 2020Dec 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 26, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 11, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2021

Completed
6.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 9, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7.3 years

First QC Date

November 11, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 3, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Stroke rehabilitationPatient-tailored rehabilitationImprovement of daily and social activityQuality of lifeHealth economyPragmatic randomized clinical trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Daily activities

    The simplified modified Rankin Scale questionnaire (smRSq) will be used to measure daily activities and functional status. The smRSq is based on the yes/no responses to five questions, which in turn results an ordinal data of seven categories (0-6) of the modified Rankin Scale. A favorable outcome will be defined as mRS score of 0-2 (no symptoms to independent but with minor disability). A poor outcome will be defined as mRS score of 3-5 (disability but able to walk to bed-bound and in need of full nursing care) or 6 (death).

    12 months follow-up after stroke

  • Social activities

    Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS)-participation (SIS-p) will be used to measure social activities. SIS-p is the dominant problem among persons after stroke reported in previous Swedish stroke RCTs; but not covered by smRSq. The SIS-p score ranges from 0-100 and the higher the score the less impact of stroke.

    12 months follow-up after stroke

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Health-related quality of life

    12 months follow-up after stroke

  • Stroke impacts

    12 months follow-up after stroke

  • Health-economic evaluation

    12 months follow-up after stroke

  • Clinicians' usability

    3 months follow-up after stroke

  • End-users' experiences and feedback

    3 months follow-up after stroke

Study Arms (2)

Intervention i.e. with Rehabkompassen®

EXPERIMENTAL

The participants will use the digital graphic Rehabkompassen® at follow-up.

Other: a usual follow-up with Rehabkompassen®

Control exposure i.e. without Rehabkompassen®

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The participants will use Post-Stroke Checklist at follow-up as recommended by "Socialstyrelsen".

Other: a usual follow-up with Post-Stroke Checklist, i.e. without Rehabkompassen®

Interventions

Rehabkompassen® is a patient-centered digital graphic tool for capturing the patient's rehabilitation needs in the follow-up after stroke.

Intervention i.e. with Rehabkompassen®

Post-Stroke Checklist consists of eleven questions concerning common and treatable post-stroke problems affecting quality of life.

Control exposure i.e. without Rehabkompassen®

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • With a stroke diagnosis
  • Time since stroke onset:
  • a) For the big RCT group, Individuals must be within the first 4 months after stroke, starting from Day 1 after the occurrence of the stroke.
  • b) For primary care group, Individuals 3 months after stroke

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to answer the evaluation questions.
  • Unable to see the Rehabkompassen®graph.
  • Not using BankID, an e-identification tool commonly used in Sweden.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Umeå University Hospital

Umeå, 90737, Sweden

RECRUITING

Related Publications (13)

  • Hu X, Wester P, Stibrant Sunnerhaagen K. [Evidence-based methods in the clinical practice in updated Swedish national stroke guidelines]. Lakartidningen. 2018 Dec 17;115:FDIX. Swedish.

    PMID: 30561751BACKGROUND
  • Hudon C, Fortin M, Haggerty JL, Lambert M, Poitras ME. Measuring patients' perceptions of patient-centered care: a systematic review of tools for family medicine. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):155-64. doi: 10.1370/afm.1226.

    PMID: 21403143BACKGROUND
  • Magaard G, Wester P, Levi R, Lindvall P, Gustafsson E, Nazemroaya Sedeh A, Lonnqvist M, Berggren S, Nyman K, Hu X. Identifying Unmet Rehabilitation Needs in Patients After Stroke With a Graphic Rehab-CompassTM. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Nov;27(11):3224-3235. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 8.

    PMID: 30097401BACKGROUND
  • Devlin NJ, Brooks R. EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Apr;15(2):127-137. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0310-5.

    PMID: 28194657BACKGROUND
  • Copas AJ, Lewis JJ, Thompson JA, Davey C, Baio G, Hargreaves JR. Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches. Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:352. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0842-7.

    PMID: 26279154BACKGROUND
  • Hargreaves JR, Copas AJ, Beard E, Osrin D, Lewis JJ, Davey C, Thompson JA, Baio G, Fielding KL, Prost A. Five questions to consider before conducting a stepped wedge trial. Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:350. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0841-8.

    PMID: 26279013BACKGROUND
  • EFFECTS Trial Collaboration. Safety and efficacy of fluoxetine on functional recovery after acute stroke (EFFECTS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Aug;19(8):661-669. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30219-2.

    PMID: 32702335BACKGROUND
  • White IR, Horton NJ, Carpenter J, Pocock SJ. Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data. BMJ. 2011 Feb 7;342:d40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d40.

    PMID: 21300711BACKGROUND
  • Optimising Analysis of Stroke Trials (OAST) Collaboration; Bath PM, Gray LJ, Collier T, Pocock S, Carpenter J. Can we improve the statistical analysis of stroke trials? Statistical reanalysis of functional outcomes in stroke trials. Stroke. 2007 Jun;38(6):1911-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.474080. Epub 2007 Apr 26.

    PMID: 17463316BACKGROUND
  • Savitz SI, Lew R, Bluhmki E, Hacke W, Fisher M. Shift analysis versus dichotomization of the modified Rankin scale outcome scores in the NINDS and ECASS-II trials. Stroke. 2007 Dec;38(12):3205-12. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.489351. Epub 2007 Nov 1.

    PMID: 17975102BACKGROUND
  • Hu X, Jonzen K, Karlsson M, Lindahl OA. Assessments of a novel digital follow-up tool Rehabkompassen(R) to identify rehabilitation needs among stroke patients in an outpatient setting. Digit Health. 2022 Jun 3;8:20552076221104662. doi: 10.1177/20552076221104662. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

    PMID: 35677783BACKGROUND
  • Hu X, Jonzen K, Lindahl OA, Karlsson M, Norstrom F, Lundstrom E, Sunnerhagen KS. Digital Graphic Follow-up Tool (Rehabkompassen) for Identifying Rehabilitation Needs Among People After Stroke: Randomized Clinical Feasibility Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jul 29;9(3):e38704. doi: 10.2196/38704.

    PMID: 35904867BACKGROUND
  • Hu X, Liv P, Lundstrom E, Norstrom F, Lindahl O, Borg K, Sunnerhagen KS. Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicentre, pragmatic trial with Rehabkompassen(R)-a digital structured follow-up tool for facilitating patient-tailored rehabilitation in persons after stroke. Trials. 2023 Oct 6;24(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07673-7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Xiaolei Hu, MD PhD

    Umeå University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Xiaolei Hu, MD PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A pragmatic RCT with allocation ratio 1:1. The permuted block randomization with stratification at each clinic will be used, with random block sizes between 2-8 to ensure participants randomly assigned to intervention respectively control group. All study participants will be followed-up at two occations, at 3- and 12-months after stroke onset. The patients will be identified by participating outpatient clinics.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2020

First Posted

June 7, 2021

Study Start

August 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Locations