NCT04910867

Brief Summary

Living donor (LD) kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, LDs take on a higher risk of future ESKD themselves. African American (AA) LDs have an even greater, 3.3-fold, risk of ESKD than white LDs post-donation. Because evidence suggests that Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) risk variants contribute to this greater risk, transplant nephrologists are increasingly using APOL1 testing to evaluate LD candidates of African ancestry. However, nephrologists do not consistently perform genetic counseling with LD candidates about APOL1 due to a lack of knowledge and skill in counseling about APOL1. Without proper counseling, APOL1 testing will magnify LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, jeopardizing their informed consent. Given their elevated risk of ESRD post-donation, and AAs' widely-held cultural concerns about genetic testing, it is ethically critical to protect AA LD candidates' safety through APOL1 testing in a culturally competent manner to improve informed decisions about donating. No transplant programs have integrated APOL1 testing into LD evaluation in a culturally competent manner. Clinical "chatbots," mobile apps that use artificial intelligence to provide genetic information to patients and relieve constraints on clinicians' time, can improve informed treatment decisions and reduce decisional conflict. The chatbot "Gia," created by a medical genetics company, can be adapted to any condition. However, no chatbot on APOL1 is currently available. No counseling training programs are available for nephrologists to counsel AA LDs about APOL1 and donation in a culturally competent manner. Given the shortage of genetic counselors, increasing nephrologists' genetic literacy is critical to integrating genetic testing into practice. The objective of this study is to culturally adapt and evaluate the effectiveness of an APOL1 testing program for AA LDs at two transplant centers serving large AA LD populations (Chicago, IL, and Washington, DC). The APOL1 testing program will evaluate the effect of the culturally competent testing, chatbot, and counseling on AA LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, preparedness for decision-making, willingness to donate, and satisfaction with informed consent. The specific aims are to:

  1. 1.Adapt Gia and transplant counseling to APOL1 for use in routine clinical practice
  2. 2.Evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention on decisional conflict, preparedness, and willingness to donate in a pre-post design
  3. 3.Evaluate the implementation of this intervention into clinical practice by using the RE-AIM framework to longitudinally evaluate nephrologist counseling practices and LDs' satisfaction with informed consent.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
206

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 8, 2021

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 2, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 9, 2021

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

July 25, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

May 8, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 22, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

GeneticsImplementation researchHealthcare disparitiesEthicsInformed consentSafetyAfrican continental ancestry groupgenetic counselingCulturally competent careElectronic health recordsDecision support systems, clinicalDecision makingLive kidney donationShared decision makingArtificial intelligenceSurveys and questionnairesQualitative researchClinical trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)

    The Decisional Conflict Scale will measure donor candidates' perceived uncertainty in decision-making about donating and satisfaction with effective decision-making. Scores range from: 0-100 Higher scores reflect greater decisional conflict (a worse outcome).

    Day 1

  • Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)

    The Decisional Conflict Scale will measure donor candidates' perceived uncertainty in decision-making about donating and satisfaction with effective decision-making. Scores range from: 0-100 Higher scores reflect greater decisional conflict (a worse outcome).

    Approximately Day 7

  • Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)

    The Decisional Conflict Scale will measure donor candidates' perceived uncertainty in decision-making about donating and satisfaction with effective decision-making. Scores range from: 0-100 Higher scores reflect greater decisional conflict (a worse outcome).

    Approximately Day 30

  • Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)

    The Decisional Conflict Scale will measure donor candidates' perceived uncertainty in decision-making about donating and satisfaction with effective decision-making. Scores range from: 0-100 Higher scores reflect greater decisional conflict (a worse outcome).

    Approximately Day 60

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Preparation for Decision Making Scale (PDMS) Scores range from: Higher scores reflect greater preparation for decision making (a better outcome)

    Day 1

  • Preparation for Decision Making Scale (PDMS) Scores range from: Higher scores reflect greater preparation for decision making (a better outcome)

    Approximately Day 7

  • Preparation for Decision Making Scale (PDMS) Scores range from: Higher scores reflect greater preparation for decision making (a better outcome)

    Approximately Day 30

  • Preparation for Decision Making Scale (PDMS) Scores range from: Higher scores reflect greater preparation for decision making (a better outcome)

    Approximately Day 60

  • Willingness to Donate Scores range from: 0 to 10. Higher scores reflect greater willingness to donate.

    Approximately Day 1

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control Arm

NO INTERVENTION

No intervention will be administered. Usual care will be administered.

Intervention Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

APOL1 testing program

Behavioral: Components of Genetic CounselingDiagnostic Test: APOL1 genetic testingOther: EHR integration

Interventions

The APOL1 testing program is designed to help living donor candidates to reduce their decisional conflict and enhance their informed consent regarding living donation. This intervention component entails: (1) an artificial intelligence-based conversational agent "chatbot" providing foundational information about the relationship between APOL1 and kidney disease and living donor outcomes, and APOL1 testing. The chatbot helps to relieve the workload on clinicians and scale up information giving. (2) The transplant nephrologist counseling component includes discussion about the APOL1 test results and shared decision making about donation, in a culturally competent manner, so as to enhance donor candidates' informed consent for living donation.

Intervention Arm
APOL1 genetic testingDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

APOL1 genetic testing will be performed while live kidney donor candidates are undergoing donor evaluation to identify whether they are at elevated risk of kidney disease post-donation. This risk information is expected to better enable donor candidates to make meaningful informed decisions about donating.

Intervention Arm

APOL1 genetic test results will be integrated into the electronic health record to provide clinical decision support to transplant nephrologists in evaluating donor candidates.

Intervention Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Living kidney donor candidates who identify as African American/Black, Jamaican, Barbadian, Grenadian, Brazilian from Salvador Trinidadian, Panamanian, Honduran, Haitian, Garifunan, Palenque, Guyanese, Dominican, Peruvian, Belizean, and Native American, or state that they have African ancestry or are aware of having biologically-related family with African ancestry
  • Living kidney donor candidates may be directed or non-directed donors
  • Adults (ages 18+)
  • English-speaking
  • Cognitively intact individuals
  • All genders

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals who do not identify as African American/Black and are not aware of having any biologically-related family with African ancestry and do not have African ancestry
  • Only African Americans and people of African ancestry will be included because APOL1 risk variants are predominantly found in African Americans and people who have African ancestry.
  • Pregnant women cannot be living kidney donors

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States

Location

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Smith JD, Agrawal A, Wicklund C, Duquette D, Friedewald J, Rasmussen LV, Gacki-Smith J, Tandon SD, Muhammad LN, Yancy CW, Dong S, Cooper M, Gilbert A, Shetty A, Gordon EJ. Implementation of a culturally competent APOL1 genetic testing programme into living donor evaluation: A two-site, non-randomised, pre-post trial design. BMJ Open. 2023 May 15;13(5):e067657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067657.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Elisa J Gordon

    Northwestern University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: A non-randomized, pre-post design. Data will be collected from participants at both sites during a control period, prior to implementing the intervention, and during an intervention period, under the proposed APOL1 genetic testing program.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2021

First Posted

June 2, 2021

Study Start

September 9, 2021

Primary Completion

March 31, 2026

Study Completion

March 31, 2026

Last Updated

July 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations