NCT04910074

Brief Summary

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a well-studied technique that has been shown to improve recovery time and reduce pain and swelling in patients undergoing surgery, including orthognathic surgery, and has no known negative effects. This study will use two groups with patients randomly assigned to either the study group, receiving LLLT, or one receiving a placebo treatment, after they have lower jaw surgery. Measurements will be taken at 24 hours, 1 week, 2 week, 3 week, 4 week, 5 week, and 6 week post-op exams to check pain, swelling and nerve function, and the two groups will be compared to see if the LLLT group has any difference

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 28, 2021

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 2, 2021

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2022

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 23, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 23, 2024

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 24, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 24, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

May 28, 2021

Results QC Date

May 6, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

orthognathiclllt

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (18)

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli

    IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.

    24 hours post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli

    IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.

    1 week post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli

    IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.

    2 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli

    IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.

    3 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli

    IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.

    4 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli

    IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.

    5 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli

    IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.

    6 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli

    IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.

    8 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Soft Stimuli

    IAN function for soft stimuli was assessed by brushing a cotton swab along a 2cm path of the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2 and 3 are on the skin of lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were identified as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the cotton swab using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes is summarized by study arm.

    20 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli

    IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.

    24 hours post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli

    IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.

    1 week post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli

    IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.

    2 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli

    IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.

    3 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli

    IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.

    4 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli

    IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.

    5 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli

    IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.

    6 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli

    IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.

    8 weeks post-surgery

  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Function for Hard Stimuli

    IAN function for hard stimuli was assessed by pressing a toothpick into the skin of the mandible and lower lip in 8 regions along the lower jaw. Regions right and left 1, 2, and 3 are on the skin of the lower face, 1 cm apart, starting on the midline, and right and left region 4 is the lower lip, separated at the midline. Right and left regions were abbreviated as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, and L4, respectively. Patients responded as to whether they were able to feel the toothpick using a binary Yes (+) or No (-) response. The number of patients who responded Yes (+) is summarized by study arm.

    20 weeks post-surgery

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Post-operative Pain

    24 hours post-surgery

  • Post-operative Pain

    1 week post-surgery

  • Post-operative Pain

    2 weeks post-surgery

  • Post-operative Pain

    3 weeks post-surgery

  • Post-operative Pain

    4 weeks post-surgery

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Low-level therapy intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will receive low-level laser therapy on the skin overlying the mandible for 40 seconds per side. All other post-operative care will be as per clinic routine.

Device: Low-level laser therapy

dummy intervention

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patients will receive no dose of laser, but the handpiece will be used against their skin top mimic the LLLT. All other post-operative care will be as per clinic routine.

Device: Dummy LLLT

Interventions

The proposed LLLT protocol will use the Biolase Epic X, an InGaAsP diode laser (940nm) using the pain relief handpiece, a device which has received FDA approval (GUDID 00647529002537) for the treatment of pain, muscle relaxation and healing via increased local circulation. The LLLT will be administered to the experimental group at 30 j/cm2. The laser will be applied extraorally, on the skin overlying the mandible. Application will be for 40 seconds per side, with 10 seconds administered in four places along the jawline, 1 cm apart starting from the gonial angle.

Low-level therapy intervention

The Biolase Epic X with pain relief handpiece will be applied with no power extraorally, on the skin overlying the mandible. Application will be for 40 seconds per side, with 10 seconds administered in four places along the jawline, 1 cm apart starting from the gonial angle.

dummy intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing mandibular surgery with bilateral sagittal split osteotomies

You may not qualify if:

  • patients must be free from pre-operative inferior alveolar neurosensory deficiencies
  • intra-operative accidental fracture or rupture of the inferior alveolar nerve

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jacobi Medical Center, Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery

The Bronx, New York, 10461, United States

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • D'Agostino A, Trevisiol L, Gugole F, Bondi V, Nocini PF. Complications of orthognathic surgery: the inferior alveolar nerve. J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Jul;21(4):1189-95. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e1b5ff.

    PMID: 20613608BACKGROUND
  • Haghighat A, Khosrawi S, Tamizifar A, Haghighat M. RETRACTED: Does Low-Level Laser Photobiomodulation Improve Neurosensory Recovery After Orthognathic Surgery? A Clinical Trial With Blink Reflex. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Mar;79(3):685-693. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.11.025. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

    PMID: 33358708BACKGROUND
  • Gasperini G, Rodrigues de Siqueira IC, Rezende Costa L. Does low-level laser therapy decrease swelling and pain resulting from orthognathic surgery? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;43(7):868-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

    PMID: 24679851BACKGROUND
  • Khullar SM, Emami B, Westermark A, Haanaes HR. Effect of low-level laser treatment on neurosensory deficits subsequent to sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Aug;82(2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80215-0.

    PMID: 8863301BACKGROUND
  • Firoozi P, Keyhan SO, Kim SG, Fallahi HR. Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy on recovery from neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Dec 17;42(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00285-0.

    PMID: 33331972BACKGROUND
  • Ezzati K, Fekrazad R, Raoufi Z. The Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Post-Surgical Pain. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Spring;10(2):79-85. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.13. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

    PMID: 31360374BACKGROUND
  • Ozen T, Orhan K, Gorur I, Ozturk A. Efficacy of low level laser therapy on neurosensory recovery after injury to the inferior alveolar nerve. Head Face Med. 2006 Feb 15;2:3. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-2-3.

    PMID: 16480503BACKGROUND
  • Esteves Pinto Faria P, Temprano A, Piva F, Sant'ana E, Pimenta D. Low-level laser therapy for neurosensory recovery after sagittal ramus osteotomy. Minerva Stomatol. 2020 Jun;69(3):141-147. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.20.04289-2. Epub 2020 Mar 16.

    PMID: 32181610BACKGROUND
  • Bittencourt MA, Paranhos LR, Martins-Filho PR. Low-level laser therapy for treatment of neurosensory disorders after orthognathic surgery: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017 Nov 1;22(6):780-787. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21968.

    PMID: 29053658BACKGROUND
  • Hamid MA. Low-level Laser Therapy on Postoperative Pain after Mandibular Third Molar Surgery. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul-Dec;7(2):207-216. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_5_17.

    PMID: 29264287BACKGROUND
  • Boutault F, Diallo R, Marecaux C, Modiga O, Paoli JR, Lauwers F. [Neurosensory disorders and functional impairment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: role of the anatomical situation of the alveolar pedicle in 76 patients]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2007 Jun;108(3):175-82; discussion 182. doi: 10.1016/j.stomax.2006.11.006. Epub 2007 Apr 19. French.

    PMID: 17448510BACKGROUND
  • Al-Bishri A, Barghash Z, Rosenquist J, Sunzel B. Neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: as reported in questionnaires and patients' records. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 May;34(3):247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.06.009.

    PMID: 15741031BACKGROUND
  • Al-Bishri A, Rosenquist J, Sunzel B. On neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Dec;62(12):1472-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.021.

    PMID: 15573346BACKGROUND
  • Reddy GK. Photobiological basis and clinical role of low-intensity lasers in biology and medicine. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2004 Apr;22(2):141-50. doi: 10.1089/104454704774076208.

    PMID: 15165389BACKGROUND
  • Kuroyanagi N, Miyachi H, Ochiai S, Kamiya N, Kanazawa T, Nagao T, Shimozato K. Prediction of neurosensory alterations after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;42(7):814-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

    PMID: 23265759BACKGROUND
  • Baas EM, Horsthuis RB, de Lange J. Subjective alveolar nerve function after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):910-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.107. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

    PMID: 21763047BACKGROUND
  • TRAUNER R, OBWEGESER H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. II. Operating methods for microgenia and distoclusion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1957 Aug;10(8):787-92; contd. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13452398BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Congenital Abnormalities

Interventions

Low-Level Light Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Laser TherapyTherapeuticsPhototherapy

Results Point of Contact

Title
Timothy P. Levine, DMD
Organization
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Timothy Levine, DMD

    Albert Einstein College of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Patients and outcomes assessor will be blinded to which group participants belong to.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: intervention vs placebo
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2021

First Posted

June 2, 2021

Study Start

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion

January 23, 2024

Study Completion

January 23, 2024

Last Updated

June 24, 2025

Results First Posted

June 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations